• Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise (illicit negative) is a formal fallacy that is committed when a categorical syllogism has a positive conclusion...
    1 KB (188 words) - 09:41, 2 November 2024
  • Negative conclusion from affirmative premises is a syllogistic fallacy committed when a categorical syllogism has a negative conclusion yet both premises...
    3 KB (365 words) - 09:45, 2 November 2024
  • of a sequence of actions or events Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise, a logical fallacy Conclusion (book), the concluding section of a book...
    1 KB (207 words) - 18:18, 10 November 2024
  • valid arguments. Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise, in which a syllogism is invalid because the conclusion is affirmative yet one of the premises...
    3 KB (395 words) - 16:36, 25 January 2025
  • An irrelevant conclusion, also known as ignoratio elenchi (Latin for 'ignoring refutation') or missing the point, is the informal fallacy of presenting...
    9 KB (1,017 words) - 18:26, 16 September 2024
  • Thumbnail for Syllogism
    Syllogism (redirect from Minor premise)
    terms. Affirmative conclusion from a negative premise: If either premise is negative, the conclusion must also be. Negative conclusion from affirmative premises:...
    45 KB (5,126 words) - 07:19, 7 May 2025
  • argument from analogy, including the relevance (positive or negative) of the known similarities to the similarity inferred in the conclusion, the degree...
    8 KB (1,007 words) - 02:14, 16 August 2024
  • major is a formal fallacy committed in a categorical syllogism that is invalid because its major term is undistributed in the major premise but distributed...
    1 KB (206 words) - 10:28, 26 July 2022
  • Thumbnail for False equivalence
    False equivalence (category Use mdy dates from May 2022)
    are developing on a grand scale as a result of relentlessly negative news. If everything and everyone is portrayed negatively, there's a leveling effect...
    9 KB (851 words) - 20:16, 29 March 2025
  • Thumbnail for Argument from ignorance
    depends entirely on the truth of the first premise (the ability to know it). Philosophy portal Argument from silence – Argument based on the absence of...
    11 KB (1,321 words) - 04:26, 5 January 2025
  • introducing a premise which states either All B is Z, or No B is Z. Also, a related rule of logic is that anything distributed in the conclusion must be distributed...
    5 KB (683 words) - 20:30, 26 October 2024
  • population has attribute A. Such a generalization proceeds from a premise about a sample (often unrepresentative or biased), to a conclusion about the population...
    9 KB (1,134 words) - 04:09, 11 March 2025
  • is an argument that concludes a hypothesis (typically a belief) to be either true or false based on whether the premise leads to desirable or undesirable...
    4 KB (541 words) - 22:41, 8 January 2025
  • Appeal to probability (category Short description is different from Wikidata)
    realized. A fallacious appeal to possibility: If it can happen (premise). It will happen. (invalid conclusion) Something can go wrong (premise). Therefore...
    2 KB (145 words) - 01:33, 13 March 2024
  • infinitum (to infinity) and argument from repetition. The term is defined by the American Heritage Dictionary as "to a disgusting or ridiculous degree; to...
    2 KB (180 words) - 12:09, 25 April 2025
  • Thumbnail for Informal fallacy
    irrelevance. It is based on the premise that there is no proof for a certain claim. From this premise, the conclusion is drawn that this claim must therefore...
    39 KB (4,871 words) - 16:31, 17 May 2025
  • Thumbnail for Illicit minor
    minor is a formal fallacy committed in a categorical syllogism that is invalid because its minor term is undistributed in the minor premise but distributed...
    1 KB (178 words) - 08:12, 15 March 2023
  • Argument from fallacy is the formal fallacy of analyzing an argument and inferring that, since it contains a fallacy, its conclusion must be false. It...
    6 KB (735 words) - 17:03, 30 December 2024
  • is morally wrong!" Here, X is the statement: "Stealing from a store is morally wrong." Person A is asserting that statement X is true. Person B: "So what...
    7 KB (823 words) - 16:08, 7 April 2025
  • fallacy is a logical fallacy in the interpretation of statistical data where inferences about the nature of individuals are deduced from inference for...
    5 KB (577 words) - 11:15, 15 May 2025
  • Denying the antecedent (category Short description is different from Wikidata)
    reason to establish their conclusions, even if their premises are true. The name denying the antecedent derives from the premise "not P", which denies the...
    3 KB (476 words) - 01:16, 9 January 2025
  • principii is not a fallacy of reasoning but an ineptitude in argumentation: thus the argument from p as a premise to p as conclusion is not deductively...
    27 KB (3,333 words) - 06:52, 14 May 2025
  • Poisoning the well (category Short description is different from Wikidata)
    A poisoned-well "argument" can also be in this form: Unfavorable definitions (be it true or false) that prevent disagreement (or enforce affirmative position)...
    4 KB (421 words) - 08:04, 28 February 2025
  • "appeal to the stick") is a type of argument made when one attempts to appeal to force to bring about the acceptance of a conclusion. One participates in argumentum...
    5 KB (467 words) - 08:39, 16 April 2025
  • (begging the question), which offers a premise no more plausible than, and often just a restatement of, the conclusion. Closely connected with [petitio principii]...
    9 KB (1,091 words) - 13:58, 23 February 2025
  • Nirvana fallacy (category Use mdy dates from April 2012)
    "imperfect" institutional arrangement. This nirvana approach differs considerably from a comparative institution approach in which the relevant choice is between...
    6 KB (764 words) - 01:15, 7 May 2025
  • Masked-man fallacy (category Wikipedia articles needing clarification from July 2021)
    of the fallacy comes from the example: Premise 1: I know who Claus is. Premise 2: I do not know who the masked man is. Conclusion: Therefore, Claus is...
    5 KB (690 words) - 20:02, 18 April 2025
  • Motte-and-bailey fallacy (category Use dmy dates from October 2020)
    it in terms of a Motte and Bailey fallacy. Nevertheless, I think it is clearly worth distinguishing the Motte and Bailey Doctrine from a particular fallacious...
    12 KB (1,473 words) - 19:40, 4 February 2025
  • Whataboutism (category Short description is different from Wikidata)
    General premise: if any country based on a particular ideology did many horrible things, then that ideology should be rejected. Political conclusion: capitalism...
    90 KB (9,052 words) - 17:43, 3 May 2025
  • Thumbnail for Affirming a disjunct
    definition, are mammals. A second example provides a first proposition that appears realistic and shows how an obviously flawed conclusion still arises under...
    3 KB (300 words) - 17:02, 21 September 2024