shipping containers is inappropriate. Shipping container includes many formats. You seem to be limiting the content to "intermodal container" (ASTM definition)...
782 bytes (92 words) - 04:46, 17 July 2023
00:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC) This is also usefull for dimensioning intermodal containers, etc. e.g. 8 ft by 8 ft by 20 ft. {{convert|8|by|8|by|20|ft|mm|0}}...
30 KB (3,678 words) - 17:08, 3 July 2018
--ClickRick (talk) 11:15, 7 June 2009 (UTC) In the case of dimensioning an intermodal container, or such, the following might be usefull {{convert|8|x|8|x|20|ft|mm|0}}...
26 KB (3,518 words) - 12:39, 14 March 2023
is now live. Johnuniq (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC) For Intermodal container#History, {{convert|8|x|8.5|x|35|ft|m|2|abbr=on}} 8 ft × 8.5 ft × 35 ft...
36 KB (4,960 words) - 02:55, 9 November 2016
11:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC) I have been searching (without luck) for an intermodal template to cover topics like Inland port/Transport hubs (freight) and...
66 KB (8,052 words) - 20:05, 11 January 2023
gallons (120 m3) Peter Horn User talk 22:34, 27 March 2011 (UTC) For Intermodal container#Non-shipping uses what would be the the customary unit and/or imperial...
35 KB (4,939 words) - 00:28, 26 February 2023
usually by using multiple maps in the same container). (INT) is usually reserved for large or intermodal interchange stations. If you just want to indicate...
70 KB (9,227 words) - 13:58, 20 January 2023
not forgotten. JIMp talk·cont 09:19, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Useful for intermodal container. Peter Horn User talk 21:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC) I think that using...
60 KB (8,193 words) - 13:57, 4 October 2022
made one minor change [1]. It's common practice in the UK articles for intermodal stations to be named X station instead of X railway station. If you generalize...
150 KB (18,899 words) - 03:54, 29 April 2025