• it. I would record myself reading it but John Cage's estate would sue me in a court of law. — CharlotteWebb 14:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC) This is the first...
    813 bytes (70 words) - 22:33, 23 September 2024
  • Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, and in fact formatted much of this page based on what is there. As for those images, I'm going to be an...
    28 KB (4,342 words) - 14:33, 20 August 2024
  • all deletion discussions? 猿丸太夫 09:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC) This argument should probably be moved to this page's counterpart, Arguments to avoid in deletion...
    5 KB (710 words) - 14:35, 3 September 2024
  • these arguments to be "a better standard than GNG.") I submit that we add this argument to the list of arguments we must avoid in AfD discussions. Opinions...
    27 KB (4,177 words) - 16:15, 15 March 2025
  • tells us to "avoid subjective judgements" in deletion discussions, which I find ridiculous as such discussions are inherently subjective. Arguments without...
    96 KB (14,879 words) - 00:46, 16 December 2023
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daybreak (Battlestar Galactica), and thought that WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions could perhaps say a little...
    83 KB (11,955 words) - 10:15, 26 May 2022
  • something to avoid in deletion discussions? I frequently happen upon users tagging comments simply because they don't agree with the arguments made in that...
    31 KB (4,398 words) - 04:58, 4 February 2023
  • again in AfDs, for example. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 16:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC) Maybe we need a WP:Avoid Arguments to Avoid in deletion discussions. --...
    30 KB (4,062 words) - 03:46, 8 June 2023
  • Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions → Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in discussionsWikipedia:Arguments to avoid in discussions — My reasoning is above...
    59 KB (8,442 words) - 04:59, 4 February 2023
  • mentioned this before, but using Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions as your argument is an argument to avoid. It's only an opinionated...
    214 KB (32,214 words) - 02:57, 16 December 2023
  • Page created by relocating section from Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions.--Paul McDonald (talk) 13:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC) Merge back...
    1 KB (129 words) - 23:58, 27 August 2024
  • arguments to the effect of "not notable now but might become notable, therefore keep for now" which I think is a risky wedge into AfD argumentation....
    145 KB (21,705 words) - 00:46, 16 December 2023
  • much longer than the rest of the entries on Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions reveals how far this is from having wide consensus. This...
    30 KB (4,553 words) - 03:23, 22 February 2021
  • this matter here on this Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Discussion page below, rather than on my personal talk page. In this manner, other users...
    33 KB (5,687 words) - 18:02, 12 February 2023
  • a counterexample, a bare WP:PERNOMINATOR (shortcut to WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Per nominator/X, essay) comment has low value despite...
    27 KB (3,993 words) - 21:23, 13 July 2025
  • are equally applicable in discussions involving things other than deletions, especially those in the "Arguments without arguments" and "Personal point of...
    30 KB (3,894 words) - 04:58, 4 February 2023
  • seems to be reiterated in deletion discussions about schools. But because it's describing the generalized outcome of AFDs, using it to try to influence...
    31 KB (4,493 words) - 04:59, 4 February 2023
  • rebuttals to particular arguments. It seems like shortcuts to this essay are way, way overused in deletion discussions. Also, having the ability to casually...
    107 KB (16,931 words) - 02:05, 16 December 2023
  • the link to the discussion. But you still were linking to wp:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#It's useful to support an argument of yours that...
    37 KB (4,984 words) - 15:15, 14 March 2023
  • consensus exists, and if so, what it is. To do this, the closer must read the arguments presented." Must read the arguments presented. Often detailed back-and-forth...
    15 KB (2,268 words) - 23:06, 29 August 2024
  • handful of arguments that were generally and universally accepted to be not suitable in deletion discussions. This article has over 50 argument types. Are...
    24 KB (3,432 words) - 12:40, 13 April 2022
  • Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid discussions 2600:1700:6180:6290:637F:5FDF:C8D4:12AC (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2025 (UTC) Nonstarter. Arguments are made in discussions...
    18 KB (2,287 words) - 23:49, 8 April 2025
  • many discussions. This will fix itself when some are closed. You can use the list at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Old unclosed discussions instead...
    62 KB (7,150 words) - 15:43, 28 June 2025
  • disagree this is generally a bad argument to use at AFD (per others), but it doesn't seem like closers of deletion discussions are particularly confused about...
    30 KB (4,135 words) - 16:28, 17 February 2025
  • WP:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions should be to give quick links to readily accessible explanations why certain common types of arguments are...
    25 KB (3,795 words) - 02:25, 16 March 2022
  • arguments can be valid or invalid". The title was recently changed from "Other stuff exists" to "When to use or avoid 'other stuff exists' arguments"...
    74 KB (11,159 words) - 20:50, 20 August 2024
  • come straight from the "Arguments to avoid in a deletion discussion". Hasteur (talk) 12:32, 17 May 2016 (UTC) If you want to make this a public essay...
    41 KB (5,901 words) - 20:27, 3 September 2024
  • really need this page to say something, then you could add an example to Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#It's in the news, but frankly...
    21 KB (3,051 words) - 16:13, 4 April 2024
  • page discussions don't usually get sufficient participation to resolve the disagreement. Maybe a more generic reference to deletion discussions would...
    73 KB (9,344 words) - 17:20, 13 July 2025
  • using the talk page as this keeps deletion discussions on deletion separate from other talk, but I think it is ok for later deletion discussions to occur...
    24 KB (4,242 words) - 16:21, 4 June 2020