(UTC) Need the page Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a press source 2013. I was going to create it, but it looked complicated. The {{Online source}} template with the...
4 KB (497 words) - 13:31, 18 October 2019
American Press Institute website, under "FEATURED SITES", they list Wikispecies as a recommended press source: "WikiSpecies: From Wikipedia, this site...
8 KB (1,064 words) - 12:27, 19 July 2012
2004 (UTC) Not quite as press source, as much as a direct link, does this count: http://news.yahoo.com/techtuesday "Wikipedia: Radio Frequency Identification...
8 KB (1,138 words) - 12:31, 29 November 2021
Note how the Dallas Morning News uses "Wikipedia" as a verb, in (Wikipedia "rave" if you don't know what this is.). *Dan T.* 18:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)...
2 KB (299 words) - 21:00, 28 February 2023
Mar 2005 (UTC) I wrote a piece about Wikipedia for Mensa's COMSIG. It's in there, but I'm not sure it would qualify as "press coverage". Someone please...
30 KB (3,668 words) - 19:55, 3 June 2025
redirect? WP:Wikipedia as a press source 2017 and WP:Wikipedia as a press source 2018 are different from WP:Press coverage 2017 and WP:Press coverage 2018...
30 KB (3,954 words) - 20:04, 30 April 2025
Wikipedia is generally quite accurate, but it is not reliable "as a source". That is the real meaning, so that's what we should say. The current title...
17 KB (2,060 words) - 08:26, 26 April 2025
"Wikipedia as a source" and "Wikipedia as a topic". I've just added an entry to Wikipedia as a press source 2008 which genuinely uses Wikipedia as a source...
10 KB (1,358 words) - 20:17, 30 April 2025
Holy crap! Time.com! Whoa! That probably goes, IMHO, in Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a press source jengod 03:51, Mar 25, 2004 (UTC) Kick ASS! Meelar 03:52...
13 KB (1,862 words) - 04:04, 1 February 2025
@CommunityNotesContributor, from WP:SOURCE: "A cited source on Wikipedia is often a specific portion of text (such as a short article or a page in a book). But when editors...
57 KB (5,899 words) - 21:47, 6 August 2025
for a long time. Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a press source 2018 seems to be a better link. That provides some general information on WP as a "source". It...
33 KB (4,295 words) - 20:03, 30 April 2025
which that page defines as: "Circular reporting, false confirmation, or citogenesis is a situation in source criticism where a piece of information appears...
36 KB (4,834 words) - 07:04, 6 July 2025
more-reliable sources. Also, unless I find a really first-class popular press article (such as the New York Times) I tend to prefer press releases put...
216 KB (33,061 words) - 17:31, 22 June 2022
lightly-edited press releases (known as WP:Churnalism); these should be treated as press releases, not as independent news sources. A reliable news source will...
119 KB (17,047 words) - 17:24, 4 February 2023
("Wikipedia Day," January 15) by <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:2003_Press_Release">announcing</a> that the English edition of the project...
17 KB (2,901 words) - 23:03, 6 October 2005
include at least one source.--Beta Lohman※Office box 18:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC) Please see also User talk:Justiyaya#Wikipedia:Press coverage 2022. @Beta...
8 KB (794 words) - 20:06, 30 April 2025
about the us of Uptodate.com as a secondary source. Wondering what people thought are about structuring references to this source? I have started siting both...
510 KB (74,529 words) - 02:19, 16 December 2023
and should not be cited in Wikipedia. A dissertation that is finished and accepted counts in my opinion as a reliable source--it has been read and approved...
25 KB (3,323 words) - 03:23, 25 July 2025
I don't know if this would fit here, but a Jerusalem Post article (http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1219218598194&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull)...
914 bytes (125 words) - 18:50, 20 August 2008
review as is standard within the scientific community. However, that's not the same as "The popular press is generally not a reliable source for scientific...
187 KB (25,727 words) - 00:35, 13 December 2023
press_publication_okay? Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_209#Cambridge_Scholars Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources Wikipedia:Reliable...
74 KB (10,093 words) - 01:25, 2 May 2025
to be a Hoover Institute/Stanford University product. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 10:24, 8 July 2025 (UTC) We have limited access East View Press, you can...
19 KB (2,824 words) - 19:44, 7 August 2025
The advice from Wikipedia editors, to other Wikipedia editors, is still the same: avoid using the popular press as your sole source for a medical or scientific...
434 KB (64,524 words) - 00:38, 13 December 2023
primary sources for that claim is the underlying research, not that statement in the "press release". The press release, itself, is a primary source for the...
74 KB (10,342 words) - 00:49, 23 April 2022
reporting [is disallowed]. Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports. Wikipedia does not constitute a primary source. However, our sister projects...
19 KB (2,394 words) - 17:34, 4 August 2025
reputation) then reading a source is not required nor should really be advocated. "If" there are sources such as "published university press books and journal...
2 KB (315 words) - 20:10, 3 September 2024
that site. Could someone please fill in the blanks, and update Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a press source 2005 also? —Phil | Talk 15:07, 7 October 2005 (UTC)...
750 bytes (100 words) - 15:07, 7 October 2005
to make the electronic source stuff a little punchier and more readable. We could do with slimmming down the various sections as they're quite verbose...
78 KB (11,590 words) - 19:39, 28 July 2025
outlet, misrepresenting them as "the press", so expect more and more. Don't know if that's the purpose of these Wikipedia pages. . . dave souza, talk 10:56...
8 KB (1,098 words) - 03:53, 1 February 2025
Actual wikipedia seems so very different to what is written in this article. In reality, a deprecated source has a de-facto ban, completely unlike what...
15 KB (1,176 words) - 20:42, 10 July 2025