Hello Deathawk and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: To sign your posts (on talk...

I'll revert your edit but if you feel strongly that it shouldn't be thier please let me know the reason why, thanks. Deathawk 21:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)...

to nothing about I suggest you try the Talk:Prince (musician) page to see if someone could help you out. --Deathawk (talk) 03:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)...

capacity Can you explain why you reverted this. --Deathawk (talk) 00:07, 17 September 2017 (UTC) @Deathawk: Sure, I'd be glad to explain. I recognize that...

page, it allows me to be informed faster about incoming messages. Thanks. Deathawk 19:17, 4 February 2006 (UTC) Permanent hiatus, an article you created,...

to time stamp the whole thing all over again? --Deathawk (talk) 11:40, 24 October 2017 (UTC) @Deathawk: It's pointless amending RfC listing pages since...

said it's not that big a deal here, I just wanted to explain myself. --Deathawk (talk) 09:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC) Hi OuendanL, I noticed that you made...

information is presented although it's less repetitive. --Deathawk (talk) 00:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC) Deathawk, thank you for the feedback! I think it really depends...

could really be confusing. So yeah I just wanted you to no where I stand Deathawk 22:15, 21 December 2005 (UTC) Hi! I caught your edit over at Wikipedia...

It's a good start but it needed a little work. --Deathawk (talk) 19:21, 19 February 2019 (UTC) Hi Deathawk... I think the comments re: the director's concept...

really don't see why you felt the need to undo my work on the sections. --Deathawk (talk) 08:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC) Your edits suck, that's why I revert...

that says Page Number: 90 you just see a 90. same goes for categorys. Deathawk 06:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC) This debate went on for 16 days without resolution...

article you accidently added yourself to the category, I took it out for ya. Deathawk 21:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC) I added it back and fixed the link - what you...

Suggestions. Or could you intervene in any way? --Deathawk (talk) 02:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC) @Deathawk: it's difficult to communicate with IPv6 editors...

but just a plot info dump seems excessive. --Deathawk (talk) 03:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC) Good point Deathawk - TheMovieGuy Hi. Thank you for your recent...

hopes of improving production sections. You can find the discussion here --Deathawk (talk) 06:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Hello TheOldJacobite. I have started...

easily lead to the next. The sections you've restored don't do that. --Deathawk (talk) 16:07, 17 December 2015 (UTC) Ok, I don't appreciate you threatening...

amount of time. Again. I'm kinda lost. Any advice? --Deathawk (talk) 04:18, 1 March 2018 (UTC) @Deathawk: Ah, what you want is WP:AWB; you can use it to burn...

I'm realy unclear as to why you changed that back. Can you explain? --Deathawk (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC) Wrong user. User talk:Soetermans is...

--Jdlh | Talk 22:46, 10 January 2006 (UTC) I saw your note on Deathawk's talk page about this category. I've moved it to Category:University and...

and add in a couple pictures if you like but try not to go overboard. Deathawk 22:05, 15 May 2006 (UTC) Thanks for uploading Image:Fort Mackinac cannon...

relatively minor, but I would like us to come to a compromise over this. --Deathawk (talk) 05:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC) Lately you've been removing all traces...

release. I'm interested to understand why you feel the old way was better. --Deathawk (talk) 07:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC) Hi. Thank you for your recent edits...

descriptions please let me know so I can contact the correct editor, thanks. Deathawk 19:46, 17 June 2006 (UTC) I didn't add them, but thanks for removing them...

just wanted to state my opinion the matter. --Deathawk (talk) 05:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC) @Deathawk: Unfortunately, the consensus is against adding...

Toilets in litrature section for example) Thanks for understanding. :) Deathawk 20:43, 26 January 2006 (UTC) Thanks for uploading Image:WeierstrassP.png...

production section, if you have any input the discussion is located here --Deathawk (talk) 06:01, 16 January 2016 (UTC) Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted...

one. Regardless, I'll wait and see what the consensus says about it. --Deathawk (talk) 05:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC) In this edit you wrote "I think a...

the draft is completed itself is probably irrelevant in the long run. --Deathawk (talk) 22:59, 3 October 2017 (UTC) I understand, but the development section...

Please, in the future refrain from removing them. --Deathawk (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC) Deathawk Sorry, wasn't done vindictively. I've just seen some...