Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court case with the National Park Service's regulation which...

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. 570 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with the intersection of anti-discrimination law...

distinguished Feiner v. New York (1951), based on the absence of violence or threats from the petitioners' march to the state capital, Justice Clark stated that...

accessible everywhere, the most restrictive community may be able to ban it everywhere. See United States v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 701 (6th Cir. 1996). There...

state legislatures have called for a constitutional amendment to reverse the Supreme Court's decision. Most of these are non-binding resolutions, but three...

advocacy of violence. In the process, Whitney v. California (1927) was explicitly overruled, and Schenck v. United States (1919), Abrams v. United States...

not express an immediate, or imminent intent, to do violence. This decision overruled Schenck v. United States (1919), which held that a "clear and present...

Amendment 1. 1791. City of Chicago v. Alexander IL App (1st) 122858. 2014. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence 468 US 288. 1984. "Forums". Legal...

disorder, and violence, is akin to treason, and is rightly denounced as a crime against the people as the sovereign power."). Clark v. United States...

Fighting words are spoken words intended to provoke a retaliatory act of violence against the speaker. In United States constitutional law, the term describes...

regarding obscenity made a decade earlier in Roth v. United States (1957). The Roth ruling established that for a work of literature to be considered obscene...

Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66 (2023), is a case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the line between true threats of violence punishable...

related to this article: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503...

Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving a school district's ability to...

States (1919) and overruled by Whitney v. California (1927), which had held that speech that merely advocated violence could be made illegal. Under the imminent...

Brandenburg v. Ohio held that "mere advocacy" of violence was per se protected speech. Brandenburg was a de facto overruling of Dennis, defining the bar for constitutionally...

United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64 (1994), was a federal criminal prosecution filed in the United States District Court for the Central...

Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. Knight, 465 U.S. 271 (1984), was a collective bargaining rights case brought before the United States Supreme...

follows from that fear, and diminishing the likelihood that the threatened violence will occur. There is some concern that even satirical speech could be regarded...

decision in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), material is "obscene" if, taken as a whole and applying contemporary community standards, it lacks...

students in the public schools. In the landmark decision Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, the U.S. Supreme Court formally recognized...

of obscenity after the landmark 1957 case Roth v. United States. The First Amendment puts protection for expressive content in terms that are both sweeping...

United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S. 803 (2000), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down Section 505 of...

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First...

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case Massachusetts v. Davis, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote that "For the Legislature absolutely or conditionally to...

Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, 576 U.S. 200 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that license...

constituted obscene material: Whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that the material appeals to a prurient interest...

applying contemporary community standards". Only material meeting this test could now be banned as "obscene". In Jacobellis v. Ohio in 1964, concerning...

case. That resulted in the court finding no grounds for incitation of violence and noting, "For similar reasons, the judgment against Evers cannot be...

were Frankfurter, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, and Whittaker. As an affirmation of Roth, the case itself has proved most important for, in the words of one scholar...