• In mechanism design, a strategyproof (SP) mechanism is a game in which each player has a weakly-dominant strategy, so that no player can gain by "spying"...
    14 KB (2,600 words) - 01:26, 20 May 2024
  • tie-breaking rule, it might become non-strategyproof. Cardinality-strategyproofness and inclusion-strategyproofness are satisfied by utilitarian approval...
    28 KB (3,135 words) - 18:43, 6 June 2024
  • condition "sharing incentive"). Strategyproofness: a user cannot get a larger allocation by lying about his needs. Strategyproofness is important, as evidence...
    7 KB (1,068 words) - 21:30, 14 March 2024
  • Again, one can define DD-strategyproofness, BD-strategyproofness, SD-strategyproofness and PC-strategyproofness. Participation - abstaining from participation...
    12 KB (1,706 words) - 01:45, 9 May 2024
  • anonymous and strategyproof for all single-peaked preferences iff it is equivalent to a median rule with at most n+1 phantoms. A rule is strategyproof for all...
    15 KB (2,181 words) - 14:49, 11 June 2024
  • does not discriminate in advance between different voters. Strong SD-strategyproofness: every false report by an agent results in an outcome that is weakly...
    10 KB (1,247 words) - 20:03, 26 May 2024
  • Monotonicity (mechanism design) Preference revelation[disambiguation needed] Strategyproofness Vazirani, Vijay V.; Nisan, Noam; Roughgarden, Tim; Tardos, Éva (2007)...
    4 KB (497 words) - 02:02, 1 May 2024
  • (where the median rule is strategyproof) and dichotomous or two-party preferences (where approval voting is strategyproof). With large electoral districts...
    56 KB (6,546 words) - 21:56, 13 June 2024
  • anonymity, strategyproofness and proportionality among all symmetric single-peaked preferences.: Prop.1  UPM is the only rule satisfying strategyproofness and...
    29 KB (3,962 words) - 19:25, 10 June 2024
  • true valuations. They are not strategyproof - a partner can gain by reporting false valuations. Indeed, strategyproofness is incompatible with envy-freeness:...
    34 KB (5,180 words) - 05:55, 15 April 2024
  • social choice rule that treats all voters equally while still being strategyproof in all situations. Its application to elections was first described...
    8 KB (1,059 words) - 21:37, 8 May 2024
  • network Scalability Sorting network Space syntax Spanning tree protocol Strategyproof Structural cohesion Vickrey–Clarke–Groves Tree and hypertree networks...
    2 KB (116 words) - 12:13, 30 October 2023
  • Thumbnail for Vickrey auction
    routing problems, this mechanism is not only strategyproof, but also the minimum among all strategyproof mechanisms. In the case of network flows, unicast...
    13 KB (2,208 words) - 20:34, 21 May 2024
  • {\displaystyle i} and some valuation vector v − i {\displaystyle v_{-i}} . Strategyproofness means that an agent with real valuation v i {\displaystyle v_{i}}...
    7 KB (1,222 words) - 22:33, 8 May 2024
  • 019. ISSN 0377-2217. Peters, Dominik (2021). "Proportionality and Strategyproofness in Multiwinner Elections". arXiv:2104.08594 [cs.GT]. Brandl, Florian;...
    29 KB (3,558 words) - 15:26, 22 December 2023
  • S a higher utility. Core-FS implies Group-FS. Several variants of strategyproofness (SP) have been studied for voting rules: Individual-SP means that...
    25 KB (3,333 words) - 23:26, 17 February 2024
  • efficiency. Maximal lotteries do not satisfy the standard notion of strategyproofness, as shown by Gibbard's theorem. Maximal lotteries are also nonmonotonic...
    9 KB (1,199 words) - 01:24, 22 May 2024
  • independence of irrelevant alternatives. Gibbard's theorem shows that any strategyproof game form (i.e. one with a dominant strategy) with more than two outcomes...
    29 KB (3,907 words) - 06:48, 8 June 2024
  • characterization of domain restrictions admitting a nondictatorial and strategyproof social welfare function. These correspond to preferences for which there...
    64 KB (5,758 words) - 18:01, 11 June 2024
  • best defends her opinions. We then say that approval voting is not strategyproof: once the voter has identified her own preferences, she does not have...
    11 KB (1,734 words) - 16:31, 12 June 2024
  • benefit from redistributing its ui among its members (this is a kind of strategyproofness axiom). Additivity - for each agent i, the allocation to i is a linear...
    4 KB (521 words) - 13:12, 21 September 2023
  • accepted distribution c*. They define a new concept called level-strategyproofness (Level-SP), which is relevant when society's decision is based on...
    21 KB (2,521 words) - 16:14, 19 February 2024
  • elicit honest preferences from voters, showing that no voting rule is strategyproof (i.e. does not depend on other voters' preferences) for elections with...
    25 KB (2,783 words) - 01:07, 9 June 2024
  • mechanism which is dominant-strategy-incentive-compatible (also called strategyproof). A function is Bayesian-Nash implementable if it is attainable by a...
    1 KB (133 words) - 12:33, 28 December 2023
  • that extends RD (which includes RSD) satisfies both efficiency and strategyproofness. The page on fair random assignment compares RSD to other procedures...
    7 KB (952 words) - 11:50, 26 March 2023
  • example, envy-freeness (EF) - no agent should envy another agent. Strategyproofness (SP) - each agent has an incentive to report his/her true preferences...
    13 KB (1,778 words) - 00:15, 30 April 2024
  • non-monetary mechanisms.) Azis, Haris; Li, Bo; Wu, Xiaowei (2019-05-22). "Strategyproof and Approximately Maxmin Fair Share Allocation of Chores". DeepAI. arXiv:1905...
    32 KB (4,115 words) - 18:58, 6 June 2024
  • Thumbnail for Arunava Sen
     222–256. Breton, M.L. and Sen, A., 1999. Separable preferences, strategyproofness, and decomposability. Econometrica, 67(3), pp. 605–628. Sen, A., 2001...
    30 KB (3,524 words) - 19:32, 4 June 2024
  • alternative of each agent (e.g. plurality voting), RFTT is equivalent to strategyproofness. This means that, for 3 or more outcomes, the only RFTT mechanisms...
    10 KB (1,443 words) - 10:35, 28 May 2024
  • Thumbnail for Sequential proportional approval voting
    Support monotonicity without additional voters Consistency inclusion- strategyproofness Computational complexity Approval voting strong ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ P Proportional...
    11 KB (1,136 words) - 10:56, 5 January 2024