help people to keep track of to read lists, rate and review books, organize book circles, read-alongs and other activities. https://thestorygraph.com/ The...
3 KB (286 words) - 18:48, 25 April 2025
different book sources. The ISBN of the 2016 book Communism: The Great Misunderstanding, by Gennady Ermak, is 9781533082893. The Book Sources page for...
79 KB (9,329 words) - 12:55, 25 April 2025
March 2014 (UTC) Both Wikipedia:BookSources and Wikipedia:Book Sources are redirects to the true page, Wikipedia:Book sources. When an edit request is apparently...
69 KB (8,147 words) - 19:57, 28 February 2023
rchType=5&referrer=02_001_Search.aspx Dear friends; testwiki:project:Book sources, ro:project:Surse de cărţi and yi:project:דרויסנדיקע ליטעראַטור ISBN...
26 KB (3,292 words) - 13:09, 4 February 2023
from Wikipedia talk:Book sources. It matches the following masks: Wikipedia talk:Book sources/Archive <#>, Wikipedia talk:Book sources. This page was last...
28 KB (39 words) - 02:55, 27 April 2025
book sources where you will be able to search for the book with ISBN MAGICNUMBER. If an ISBN search fails, your book source may still have the book,...
1 KB (115 words) - 09:50, 20 March 2023
the books ISBN from the Book Sources page on Wiki, sometimesthe viewer will land on a page on worldcat, and it will state the book is not available in any...
87 KB (12,771 words) - 18:52, 16 May 2024
25-year-old book to be outdated? The Kitab-ı Bahriye article makes more sense because pretty much all the other good sources for this book are offline...
198 KB (28,563 words) - 22:47, 30 May 2025
secondary sources for analysis and conclusions... see WP:PSTS). So, if secondary sources exist, we should use them instead of the primary CT sources. Blueboar...
186 KB (28,318 words) - 17:24, 4 February 2023
articles as sources…": surely this is much too strong. They are not considered citable sources, but they are perfectly legitimate sources when writing...
216 KB (33,447 words) - 09:34, 26 March 2022
reputable lay source (e.g., What to Expect When You're Expecting, Dr. Susan Love's Breast Book), and a famous altmed/pseudoscience sources that are mentioned...
80 KB (11,604 words) - 22:11, 28 May 2025
are to rewrite ISBN links to point to the book source of the users choice, instead of the Special:Book_sources page, which has grown so large as to become...
5 KB (689 words) - 00:44, 23 July 2017
secondary sources, then these secondary sources are not really used as secondary sources. By definition, if you use something as a secondary source, you must...
151 KB (24,064 words) - 23:43, 14 October 2024
comes essentially from one book, but presumably it will grow and other sources will be cited. In my experience, if sources are not cited when the material...
35 KB (5,717 words) - 20:22, 21 March 2020
wikipedia's policy on citing sources that are not available on the web. Say for example citing a source from an old book with the ISBN or citing a journal...
153 KB (23,386 words) - 23:37, 2 March 2023
redlightgreen is a free tool for citing sources and can also be used to gather ISBN numbers for each specific edition of a book (shows all editions). it can reference...
92 KB (14,681 words) - 13:23, 4 February 2023
sources and Wikipedia:Verifiability state the reason for limiting Self-published sources is that, "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published...
227 KB (34,800 words) - 15:08, 5 September 2024
cleaning up: Wikipedia:Vaccine_safety/Reliable_sources/NAS_bibliography -- some of these (book) sources can be added to the RS list, especially if there...
8 KB (909 words) - 20:43, 1 October 2024
works, as well as 'secondary' works such as book reviews. add rules for references to non-standard sources like television series episodes explain various...
70 KB (11,675 words) - 13:24, 4 February 2023
Christian music/Sources?--¿3family6 contribs 16:45, 13 July 2013 (UTC) Sources is of a higher quality than just music review sources, so we have to be...
18 KB (2,078 words) - 23:07, 24 November 2024
these two sources. In terms of the reliability of the source as described at Wikipedia:Reliable sources, my thought is that some kind of sources maybe reliable...
78 KB (11,667 words) - 07:13, 20 January 2022
posession as source and gives the name in the sources section. How can others verify the fact of the text unless they also have a copy of that book. Say for...
45 KB (7,281 words) - 23:41, 19 April 2022
the sources you want here are called "secondary" sources, not "third-party" sources. Actually, Wikipedia IS a third-party source or tertiary source: http://www...
252 KB (37,495 words) - 14:15, 28 January 2023
research and reliable sources. We need to exclude biased and unreliable sources of inforamtion such as many in mass media published sources and make provisions...
259 KB (38,824 words) - 17:22, 4 February 2023
particular word was not in use before 2004, despite a number of sources showing otherwise. These sources are Usenet and bulletin board posts and blogs. The editor...
133 KB (21,106 words) - 13:41, 8 August 2021
details in the References section), because my source is not a book but a website. For this case of web sources, should I just use inline citations and display...
244 KB (37,071 words) - 00:09, 23 April 2022
particular book, every particular book. Sites which need to be fact checked by Wikipedia editors should simply not be included as secondary sources of information...
247 KB (38,886 words) - 15:03, 9 March 2023
under Self-published and questionable sources Online retailers References to websites which only offer a book, album or other product for sale do little...
129 KB (20,044 words) - 10:40, 26 May 2022
Considering things related to history, indicating primary sources and secondary sources is desirable in my opinion. Perhaps you would agree? Nixdorf 20:39...
34 KB (5,530 words) - 13:25, 4 February 2023
cite sources, any sources, and given positive reinforcement for doing so. It is relatively likely that when a web source directly quotes e.g. a book that...
273 KB (43,744 words) - 17:24, 4 February 2023