• Moved to: Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view...
    51 bytes (8 words) - 17:40, 30 October 2005
  • "the neutral point of view". In fact, this way of using the expression helps a lot to explain that the neutral point of view is NOT the point of view in...
    246 KB (33,309 words) - 06:35, 23 June 2024
  • concept of a neutral point of view should be based on the collective equality of USERS of wikipedia. "Speciesism" is, at best, a fringe point of view and...
    80 KB (12,461 words) - 23:50, 15 December 2023
  • Out of curiosity, isn’t a Neutral Point of View policy technically flawed since no perspective can be neutral? I mean, the very meaning of a ‘point of view’...
    73 KB (11,323 words) - 14:58, 10 December 2021
  • labeled "neutral point of view as applied to science" states: 1a) Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, a fundamental policy, requires fair representation of significant...
    209 KB (32,197 words) - 16:21, 4 February 2023
  • This page contains an alpha version of paragraphs or/and sections of the Neutral Point of View policy. It should be edited as if it was the policy. In...
    4 KB (625 words) - 08:15, 1 May 2008
  • are overplaying the point somewhat - see my comments on what "a neutral point of view" really means in the section directly below, jguk 12:45, 25 January...
    55 KB (8,902 words) - 14:04, 11 October 2008
  • wishes of the community, this discussion has been moved to User_talk:-Lumière#Discussion about the Undue weight section of Neutral point of view FeloniousMonk...
    51 KB (7,724 words) - 16:20, 4 February 2023
  • interpretation. It is clear that the criteria of the Undue weight section need to be interpreted in view of specific situations. Moreover, in practice,...
    22 KB (3,683 words) - 14:14, 13 June 2006
  • here to post a question to the Neutral point of view noticeboard When starting a new topic, please add it to the bottom of this page, and please sign your...
    12 KB (1,440 words) - 18:05, 22 June 2024
  • that we do. Perhaps it is time that we propose another name than Neutral Point Of View, but not a name that is so vague as to include all content policies...
    8 KB (1,295 words) - 10:09, 1 February 2006
  • (UTC) The paragraph you cite is an essay extolling the merits of having a neutral point of view policy. I agree it is a fairly poor one and we could do without...
    43 KB (7,212 words) - 14:11, 13 June 2006
  • they believe Wikipedia should adopt a "scientific point of view" rather than a "neutral point of view." However, it has not been established that there...
    44 KB (7,334 words) - 12:30, 18 July 2021
  • neutral point of view to the reader. There are two definitions of "publish" being kicked about at Reliable Sources, these conflicting points of view have...
    38 KB (5,950 words) - 21:40, 18 February 2023
  • (UTC) I have killed off the redirect for Neutral point of view, which pointed to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. NPOV should really get it's own article...
    49 KB (7,946 words) - 21:17, 12 October 2010
  • neutral point of view an oxymoron. It is a point of view in it's self. --Greyfox Read the section of this article titled "What is the neutral point of...
    28 KB (4,519 words) - 14:08, 13 June 2006
  • The neutral point of view is a point of view. It is just the consensus point of view. Otherwise the term would instead be the non-point of view. It is...
    23 KB (3,640 words) - 14:09, 13 June 2006
  • written from a neutral point of view, representing views fairly and without bias. This is further clarified as all significant points of view are presented...
    110 KB (16,828 words) - 23:56, 14 March 2023
  • with a neutral point of view on the meaning of life?", but you wrote the equivalent of "Can you write an article with a non neutral point of view on the...
    18 KB (2,817 words) - 14:11, 13 June 2006
  • express a point of view, in which case a neutral point of view (NPOV), has a slightly different meaning. For example: An article on cosmology (study of the...
    6 KB (841 words) - 03:39, 20 January 2023
  • the article: "The presence of articles written from an exclusively United States point of view is merely a reflection of the fact that there are many...
    39 KB (6,182 words) - 18:59, 7 July 2006
  • found mentions at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Common_objections_and_clarifications and Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ#Writing_for_the_.22enemy...
    257 KB (37,317 words) - 16:13, 9 October 2021
  • REDIRECT Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view...
    188 bytes (7 words) - 07:26, 2 April 2011
  • 2017 (UTC) What would the opposite of this be? Wikipedia:Non-neutral point of view or Wikipedia:Biased point of view or something else? ScratchMarshall...
    80 KB (11,680 words) - 18:46, 18 February 2023
  • the ordering of their presentation. But isn't this the mistaken interpretation that is explicitly rejected in Wikipedia:Neutral point of view#Objections...
    41 KB (6,543 words) - 14:10, 13 June 2006
  • down as much as possible. I think there may be more to neutral articles than neutral point of view. For example perhaps Positive tone should be equally...
    28 KB (4,517 words) - 14:10, 13 June 2006
  • NPOV/non-NPOV judgements of articles. (did I say objective? I meant absolutely, undisputedly objective) A neutral point of view is impossible (and unhealthy)...
    23 KB (3,585 words) - 15:29, 7 May 2013
  • I've started a subpage (Wikipedia_talk:Neutral_point_of_view/Killing_NPOV) for discussion of an RfC regarding the proper unbiased terms to use for killings...
    253 KB (39,488 words) - 00:50, 16 December 2023
  • the authors of this page. I also want to withdraw a suggestion I made earlier: while I like "perspectivist point of view" better than 'neutral', I grant...
    65 KB (10,598 words) - 16:20, 4 February 2023
  • heavily criticised " The world "heavily" is not neutral. You can't measure "heavily". A neutral point of view would not include adverbs or adjectives like...
    9 KB (1,345 words) - 12:02, 18 October 2022