Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence, 468 U.S. 288 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court case with the National Park Service's regulation which...

provisions of Title IX of the Civil Rights Act narrowly; Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence, which denied that protesters' First Amendment rights...

distinguished Feiner v. New York (1951), based on the absence of violence or threats from the petitioners' march to the state capital, Justice Clark stated that...

accessible everywhere, the most restrictive community may be able to ban it everywhere. See United States v. Thomas, 74 F.3d 701 (6th Cir. 1996). There...

state legislatures have called for a constitutional amendment to reverse the Supreme Court's decision. Most of these are non-binding resolutions, but three...

related to this article: Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503...

Amendment 1. 1791. City of Chicago v. Alexander IL App (1st) 122858. 2014. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence 468 US 288. 1984. "Forums". Legal...

regarding obscenity made a decade earlier in Roth v. United States (1957). The Roth ruling established that for a work of literature to be considered obscene...

not express an immediate, or imminent intent, to do violence. This decision overruled Schenck v. United States (1919), which held that a "clear and present...

303 Creative LLC v. Elenis, 600 U.S. 570 (2023), is a United States Supreme Court decision that dealt with the intersection of anti-discrimination law...

applying contemporary community standards". Only material meeting this test could now be banned as "obscene". In Jacobellis v. Ohio in 1964, concerning...

States (1919) and overruled by Whitney v. California (1927), which had held that speech that merely advocated violence could be made illegal. Under the imminent...

Under the law as passed, if a participating candidate is outspent by a non-participating opponent (including the opponent's expenditures of personal...

advocacy of violence. In the process, Whitney v. California (1927) was explicitly overruled, and Schenck v. United States (1919), Abrams v. United States...

Fighting words are spoken words intended to provoke a retaliatory act of violence against the speaker. In United States constitutional law, the term describes...

Counterman v. Colorado, 600 U.S. 66 (2023), is a case of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the line between true threats of violence punishable...

Westside Community Board of Education v. Mergens, 496 U.S. 226 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court case involving a school district's ability to...

follows from that fear, and diminishing the likelihood that the threatened violence will occur. There is some concern that even satirical speech could be regarded...

sector, is also legal in the public sector. They found that non-members may be assessed dues for "collective bargaining, contract administration, and grievance...

United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc., 513 U.S. 64 (1994), was a federal criminal prosecution filed in the United States District Court for the Central...

" Three justices dissented in an opinion by Justice Tom C. Clark, criticizing the Court for employing a "pretext," in order to avoid deciding the core...

American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock, 2011 MT 328, is a decision by the Montana Supreme Court ruling that the broad free speech protections...

were Frankfurter, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, and Whittaker. As an affirmation of Roth, the case itself has proved most important for, in the words of one scholar...

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First...

Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck, No. 17-1702, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case related to limitations on First Amendment-based...

decision in Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), material is "obscene" if, taken as a whole and applying contemporary community standards, it lacks...

National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo, 602 U.S. 175 (2024), is a United States Supreme Court case which held that if Maria T. Vullo, the former...

conflicting messages, that do not represent the values and ideals of the community, or removing all monuments from public space. He questioned whether, if...

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case Massachusetts v. Davis, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote that "For the Legislature absolutely or conditionally to...

United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S. 803 (2000), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down Section 505 of...