The inventive step and non-obviousness reflect a general patentability requirement present in most patent laws, according to which an invention should...
24 KB (3,357 words) - 12:42, 30 September 2024
in particular whether an invention meets the novelty and the inventive step or non-obviousness criteria for patentability. In most systems of patent...
25 KB (2,924 words) - 19:54, 23 May 2025
Patentability (section Opposition and reexamination)
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and other patent offices is the requirements for non-obviousness and for inventive step. Although both requirements...
12 KB (1,529 words) - 09:56, 3 October 2024
inventive step and non-obviousness, industrial applicability and utility, as well as sufficient disclosure, unity of invention, or claim drafting and...
2 KB (168 words) - 20:17, 3 November 2023
Software patent (section Obviousness)
question of inventive step and non-obviousness in relation to software patents. Europe uses an 'Inventive step test'; see the Inventive step requirement...
74 KB (8,273 words) - 15:20, 15 May 2025
payment environment Teaching-suggestion-motivation, a test of inventive step and non-obviousness in patent law Superior Military Court (Portuguese: Tribunal...
1 KB (194 words) - 03:11, 15 February 2025
invention is non-obvious or not (in U.S. patent law), or involves an inventive step or not (in European patent laws). If it would have been obvious for this...
12 KB (1,832 words) - 09:54, 7 December 2024
non-obviousness is often conflated with non-predictability. It is easier to find non-obviousness in non-predictable arts (such as pharmacology), and more...
29 KB (3,675 words) - 07:02, 13 December 2023
in all fields of technology, provided they are new, involve an inventive step, and are capable of industrial application. Nevertheless, there are variations...
107 KB (11,569 words) - 19:28, 29 April 2025
believe that much of the legislation is a disincentive to inventiveness, and stifles new businesses and job growth by threatening the financial rewards available...
9 KB (1,106 words) - 22:49, 7 September 2024
claimed therein needs to be new and inventive. In patent law, these requirements are known as novelty and non-obviousness. A patent cannot in theory be...
21 KB (3,326 words) - 18:18, 11 October 2023
into an issued patent and is deemed abandoned one year after its filing. It is used to secure a filing date for a subsequent non-provisional patent application...
10 KB (1,158 words) - 19:20, 23 May 2025
Chemical patent (redirect from Chemical and pharmaceutical patent)
main reason for invalidating these weak follow-up patents in courts is obviousness in view of the prior art, which was not considered by the examiner. Nevertheless...
9 KB (1,052 words) - 19:16, 13 February 2025
fulfils the requirements for patentability." For a list of patent offices and their websites, see the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) maintained...
4 KB (363 words) - 19:53, 16 December 2024
tests of patentability: patentable subject matter, novelty, inventive step or non-obviousness, and industrial applicability (or utility). A business method...
27 KB (3,350 words) - 00:29, 23 May 2025
Industrial applicability (section References and notes)
application is "a method of contraception [...] to be applied in the private and personal sphere of a human being". In United States patent law, the utility...
4 KB (553 words) - 09:31, 18 March 2023
Unity of invention (redirect from Non unity of invention)
a common "special technical feature", which is usually equated with inventive step. On the other hand, the USPTO uses for its domestic applications a very...
28 KB (3,618 words) - 09:53, 15 May 2025
publication renders the competitor's invention obvious or lacking in novelty. Huggins, John. "Copyrights, Designs and Intellectual Property". Hamradio.ME. Retrieved...
3 KB (353 words) - 02:04, 20 February 2025
Hayling Island (section Sport and leisure)
patent law in the United Kingdom, in terms of Inventive step and non-obviousness. The case, Chilvers, Hayling, and a replica of Chilvers's original board were...
32 KB (3,147 words) - 20:26, 4 May 2025
Patent war (section Effects and response)
defensively. There are ongoing patent wars between the world's largest technology and software corporations. Contemporary patent wars are a global phenomenon,...
9 KB (925 words) - 16:46, 22 March 2025
United States patent law (section Obviousness (ยง103))
"non-obvious." The US requirement for non-obviousness corresponds to the inventive step requirement in other countries. An "invention" is obvious (and...
36 KB (4,046 words) - 20:34, 8 March 2025
Level of invention (redirect from Degree of Inventiveness)
capacity originally introduced by Prof. Suarez-Villa in 1990. Inventive step and non-obviousness Novelty (patent) Suarez-Villa, Luis (2011). "publications-LSV"...
3 KB (354 words) - 16:56, 16 July 2021
Japanese patent law (section Inventive step)
highly advanced does not imply a requirement for an inventive step since the matter of inventive step is dealt with in Article 29, paragraph 2. The definition...
27 KB (3,678 words) - 21:53, 7 May 2025
Centre (INPADOC), the European Patent Office (EPO) and WIPO recognize the following definitions of simple and extended patent families: Simple patent family:...
4 KB (451 words) - 11:21, 16 December 2023
find relevant prior art document to question to novelty or inventive step (or non-obviousness in United States patent law) of an invention. Under United...
2 KB (249 words) - 08:45, 13 June 2024
or as articles of manufacture, provided that they are useful, novel and non-obvious. However, a precise description (such as molecular structure) is not...
18 KB (2,509 words) - 09:25, 20 October 2024
Patentable subject matter (redirect from Non-patentable subject-matter)
be denied patent protection. Together with criteria such as novelty, inventive step or nonobviousness, utility (or industrial applicability), which differ...
15 KB (1,845 words) - 21:18, 13 January 2025
factors for determining ambiguity in U.S. patent law (see Inventive step and non-obviousness or Graham v. John Deere Co.) Graham (mango), a named mango...
3 KB (396 words) - 17:36, 13 May 2025
precedent for patent law in the United Kingdom, in terms of inventive step and non-obviousness; the court upheld the defendant's claim that the Schweitzer patent...
10 KB (1,153 words) - 17:54, 3 April 2025
Trilateral Patent Offices (category United States Patent and Trademark Office)
that the EPO and USPTO should make more use of the JPO search documentation and vice versa and that there should be more exchange of non-patent literature...
5 KB (492 words) - 18:47, 9 April 2024