Wikisource has original text related to this article: Chimel v. California Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme...

Chimel may refer to: Chimel v. California, the United States Supreme Court case Laj Chimel, a small town in Guatemala Tony Chimel, American wrestling...

commonly known as search incident to arrest (SITA) or the Chimel rule (from Chimel v. California), is a U.S. legal principle that allows police to perform...

describing the decision as "the privacy gift that keeps on giving." In Chimel v. California (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that if the police arrest someone...

v. Alfred H. Mayer Co., Katz v. United States, Chimel v. California, and Sierra Club v. Morton. He wrote dissenting opinions in cases such as Engel v...

volume 556 Chimel v. California (1969) New York v. Belton "ARIZONA v. GANT". LII / Legal Information Institute. Retrieved June 17, 2021. "ARIZONA v. GANT |...

Katz was tried in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. Katz moved to suppress the FBI's recordings, arguing that because the...

the practice more directly, such as the Supreme Court of California's 1963 decision in People v. Mickelson. On October 31, 1963, police officer Martin McFadden...

Belton extended the so-called "Chimel rule" of searches incident to a lawful arrest, established in Chimel v. California (1969), to vehicles. The Supreme...

California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35 (1988), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit...

Navarette v. California, 572 U.S. 393 (2014), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court clarified when police officers may make arrests or conduct...

Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that an objective reasonableness standard...

Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth...

arrestee could be searched, but it did not define the term. In deciding Chimel v. California (1969), the Supreme Court elucidated its previous decisions. It held...

Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that, under the Fourth Amendment, when a...

Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that held that all occupants of a car are "seized"...

original text related to this article: Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)...

United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. 400 (2012), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that installing a Global Positioning...

Carpenter v. United States, 585 U.S. 296, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell...

reasonable search under that Amendment." Chimel v. California (1969) Virginia v. Moore (2008) Arizona v. Gant (2009) People v. Diaz (2011) Aaronson, David E.;...

reasonable suspicion without more. And in Kolender v. Lawson, 461 U.S. 352 (1983), the Court struck down a California stop-and-identify law that required a suspect...

those on the arrest scene. Justice White distinguished the case of Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), which held that in the absence of a search...

Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977), is a United States Supreme Court criminal law decision holding that a police officer ordering a person out...

document. 541 U.S. at 632. Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009). Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969). United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798 (1982). Ball...

Olmstead v. United States, 277 U.S. 438 (1928), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, on the matter of whether wiretapping of private...

Nardone v. United States, 308 U.S. 338 (1939), was a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that evidence obtained via warrantless wiretaps...

United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), was a United States Supreme Court decision that determined that Fourth Amendment protections do...

Kyllo Do Not Account for Current Technology". California Western Law Review. 51 (2): 282–291. Kyllo v. United States - Oral Argument (Oral argument)...

Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a lawsuit against a sheriff's deputy brought...

car. Nearly a decade later, the Court, in California v. Acevedo, 500 U.S. 565 (1991), overturned Arkansas v. Sanders, noting that the decision in the...