Fancruft is a term sometimes used on Wikipedia to imply that a selection of content is important only to a small population of enthusiastic fans of the...
9 KB (1,274 words) - 22:34, 14 April 2024
been deleted. —No-One Jones (m) 21:33, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC) Keep Wikipedia:Fancruft, which was nominated by Trollminator either in ignorance of the deletion...
779 bytes (94 words) - 11:21, 26 September 2006
Wikipedia:Fancruft A WikiProject to combat the problem of fancruft. ''Flux55'' (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2024 (UTC) List of important pages and categories...
2 KB (189 words) - 22:24, 19 February 2024
related pages that are disliked, with many votes for deletion being "delete, fancruft". It is being treated as a guideline and a rule when it is not and due...
3 KB (275 words) - 14:37, 2 April 2022
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Fancruft). Thus, I believe that Wikipedia:Fancruft, Wikipedia:Cruft, Wikipedia:Listcruft, and Wikipedia:GAMECRUFT...
116 KB (15,216 words) - 10:32, 22 March 2022
I'll revise that. What I am trying to say is that long plot summaries, fancruft, in-universe writing and articles about non-notable subjects are something...
36 KB (4,439 words) - 02:03, 26 March 2023
allegations of "fancruft". Quack 688 07:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Keep but add a big warning on the top saying it's not policy. Fancruft should be a way...
13 KB (1,643 words) - 03:13, 11 February 2023
17 July 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia:Fancruft (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) This essay and the concept of fancruft is being wielded too liberally...
6 KB (790 words) - 20:09, 17 July 2020
Lacks verifaction and is fancruft Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete per Doc Strange minus the fancruft argument. Vickser (talk)...
4 KB (260 words) - 19:51, 11 February 2023
read the article to see that it was pure fancruft. That being said, I also read the article. It's pure fancruft. Lack of notability as well. 22:35, 10 January...
7 KB (872 words) - 16:42, 13 May 2022
Wikipedians have made statements such as "Delete per WP:Fancruft." This is, of course, ridiculous: Fancruft is an essay, not a guideline. Wikipedia does have...
1 KB (156 words) - 19:16, 7 October 2010
one day Wikipedia:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability Wikipedia:Fancruft User:Emijrp/All human knowledge User:Guy Macon/On the Diameter of the Sewer...
2 KB (135 words) - 20:46, 7 April 2021
with it is that it's fancruft. Look it up. Danny Lilithborne 02:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC) Delete as mentioned above, it's fancruft. Sheehan (Talk) 02:21...
4 KB (346 words) - 18:45, 8 February 2023
Marked for speedy but isn't a candidate. Star Wars "Expanded Universe" fancruft. — Gwalla | Talk 5 July 2005 02:37 (UTC) Extremely Weak Keep. Might actually...
5 KB (604 words) - 16:14, 17 April 2022
20:14, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC) Delete as fancruft. Martg76 20:51, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC) Delete. Lists are inherently evil. :) Fancruft is another good word for it. --Woohookitty...
4 KB (511 words) - 12:40, 7 February 2023
2004 (UTC) Delete: Fancruft trivia. Geogre 15:53, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) Delete. Fancruft. jni 16:12, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC) Delete. Fancruft. AtonX 16:15, 13 Nov...
1 KB (183 words) - 06:48, 22 April 2010
value of this article is very niche and would probably be considered WP:FANCRUFT. The entire situation could be adequately described in a couple of sentences...
8 KB (827 words) - 06:13, 18 September 2020
There is an abundance of fancruft on Wikipedia. Fancruft generally falls into two categories: Copyright violations: Stuff that's directly pulled from...
835 bytes (113 words) - 10:12, 9 January 2020
(UTC) Delete nn fancruft. Ken 22:49, July 28, 2005 (UTC) Delete per Ken Hansonc 22:50, July 28, 2005 (UTC) Delete. Admitted fancruft. Fernando Rizo T/C...
2 KB (193 words) - 09:11, 6 February 2023
cruft. Jclemens: Actually, I think "fancruft" as it applies to A Song of Ice and Fire has been redefined. Fancruft are things that no one actually talks...
15 KB (2,321 words) - 01:52, 6 January 2024
result of the debate was delete. Flowerparty☀ 00:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC) Fancruft. — WCityMike (T | C) ⇓ plz reply HERE (why?) ⇓ 23:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)...
4 KB (343 words) - 13:59, 7 February 2023
deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC) Delete. WP:FANCRUFT trivia. Ajf773 (talk) 20:12, 3 December 2019 (UTC) Delete. You know you're...
6 KB (463 words) - 22:00, 10 December 2019
nobody has mentioned yet that it's also fancruft. ― LADY GALAXY 03:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Delete, OR, fancruft, overly long, get it out of here. - Realkyhick...
17 KB (2,352 words) - 19:00, 7 February 2023
writing in an in-universe perspective, as well as original research and "fancruft". Vandalism has also been a problem, leading to a few pages being protected...
9 KB (1,278 words) - 01:16, 6 January 2024
Here, it's just excessive fancruft. Reyk YO! 21:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC) Delete This is a true case of excessive fancruft.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:08...
6 KB (505 words) - 17:05, 25 August 2020
result was delete. Clear consensus that this is, indeed, the cruftiest of fancruft. Sandstein 09:34, 2 April 2018 (UTC) List of vehicles in The Matrix (franchise)...
7 KB (633 words) - 09:34, 2 April 2018
wish to delete largely want to delete because it is "fancruft" (a site discussed to store fancruft on was proposed: "Wikicruft"). It appears that this...
20 KB (3,206 words) - 06:56, 7 February 2023
articles that fall under this essay tend to be on the extreme edge of fancruft. There will always be supporters of, say, an article on Dr. Crusher's stunt...
2 KB (248 words) - 23:50, 27 September 2023
Delete. Usual-variety fancruft. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC) Delete per nomination. Blatant fancruft is so much worse than...
4 KB (393 words) - 21:54, 10 December 2019
Contextless fancruft. jni 17:10, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete non-notable, possibly original research? --Deathphoenix 02:03, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC) Delete, fancruft. --Idont...
2 KB (183 words) - 02:35, 12 February 2023