Tate v. Short
Tate v. Short | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued January 14, 1971 Decided March 2, 1971 | |
Full case name | Tate v. Short |
Citations | 401 U.S. 395 (more) 91 S. Ct. 668; 28 L. Ed. 2d 130 |
Holding | |
It is a violation of equal protection to convert a fine to jail time simply because the sentenced person cannot pay the fine. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Brennan, joined by unanimous |
Concurrence | Blackmun |
Concurrence | Black |
Concurrence | Harlan |
Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held it is a violation of equal protection to convert a fine to jail time simply because the sentenced person cannot pay the fine.[1]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]Further reading
[edit]- "Indigent Defendant-Statutory Fines". Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science. 62 (4): 493–496. 1971. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
- Barton, Robert W. (1970–1971). "Equal Protection - An Indigent Cannot Be Imprisoned for His Inability to Pay a Fine - Tate v. Short Recent Case". Dickinson Law Review. 75 (3): 528–533. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
- Denver, James P. (1974). "Conversion of Fine into Imprisionment [sic]: A Violation of Tate or Argersinger or Neither?". Florida Law Review. 26: 630–635. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
- Lowery, John D. (1971–1972). "Criminal Procedure--Equal Protection--The Dual Impact of Tate v. Short on Default Imprisonment and Monetary Bail Notes". North Carolina Law Review. 50 (1): 136–144. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
External links
[edit]- Text of Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971) is available from: Cornell CourtListener Findlaw Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio)