Tate v. Short

Tate v. Short
Argued January 14, 1971
Decided March 2, 1971
Full case nameTate v. Short
Citations401 U.S. 395 (more)
91 S. Ct. 668; 28 L. Ed. 2d 130
Holding
It is a violation of equal protection to convert a fine to jail time simply because the sentenced person cannot pay the fine.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · William O. Douglas
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Case opinions
MajorityBrennan, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceBlackmun
ConcurrenceBlack
ConcurrenceHarlan

Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held it is a violation of equal protection to convert a fine to jail time simply because the sentenced person cannot pay the fine.[1]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Tate v. Short, 401 U.S. 395 (1971).

Further reading

[edit]
  • "Indigent Defendant-Statutory Fines". Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science. 62 (4): 493–496. 1971. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
  • Barton, Robert W. (1970–1971). "Equal Protection - An Indigent Cannot Be Imprisoned for His Inability to Pay a Fine - Tate v. Short Recent Case". Dickinson Law Review. 75 (3): 528–533. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
  • Denver, James P. (1974). "Conversion of Fine into Imprisionment [sic]: A Violation of Tate or Argersinger or Neither?". Florida Law Review. 26: 630–635. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
  • Lowery, John D. (1971–1972). "Criminal Procedure--Equal Protection--The Dual Impact of Tate v. Short on Default Imprisonment and Monetary Bail Notes". North Carolina Law Review. 50 (1): 136–144. Retrieved June 27, 2025.
[edit]