French
DeutschTaylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.
| Taylor v. Standard Gas and Electric Company | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued January 5, 1939 Decided February 27, 1939 | |
| Full case name | Taylor, et al., Independent Committee v. Standard Gas and Electric Company, et al. |
| Citations | 306 U.S. 307 (more) 59 S. Ct. 543; 83 L. Ed. 669; 1939 U.S. LEXIS 972 |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Roberts, joined by Hughes, McReynolds, Butler, Stone, Black, Reed |
| Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Taylor v. Standard Gas and Electric Company, 306 U.S. 307 (1939), was an important United States Supreme Court case in United States corporate law that laid down the "Deep Rock doctrine" as a rule of bankruptcy and corporate law. This holds that claims, as creditors, upon an insolvent subsidiary company by controlling shareholders or other insiders, like managers or directors, will be subordinated to the claims of all other creditors.
Facts[edit]
The Deep Rock Oil Corporation was an undercapitalized subsidiary of the defendant Standard Gas Company.
![[icon]](/wiki/en/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small} | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (November 2013) |
Judgment[edit]
The Supreme Court held that, where a subsidiary corporation declares bankruptcy and an insider or controlling shareholder of that subsidiary corporation asserts claims as a creditor against the subsidiary, loans made by the insider to the subsidiary corporation may be deemed to receive the same treatment as shares of stock owned by the insider.
Therefore, the insider's claims will be subordinated to the claims of all other creditors, i.e. other creditors will be paid first, and if there is nothing left after other creditors are paid then the insider gets nothing. This also applies (and indeed the doctrine was first established) where a parent company asserts such claims against its own subsidiary.
The doctrine will be applied where equity requires, particularly where the subsidiary was undercapitalized at the time that it was established, and can thereby be shown to have been mismanaged for the parent corporation's benefit.
See also[edit]
External links[edit]
- Text of Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co., 306 U.S. 307 (1939) is available from: Justia Library of Congress
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |