Template talk:Japanese dogs

WikiProject iconDogs Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Dogs To-do:

Here are some tasks you can do to help with WikiProject Dogs:

WikiProject iconJapan Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 04:43, April 24, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject Japan to do list:
  • Featured content candidates – 

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Wolves[edit]

No other dog breed by nationality navbox includes any wolf subspecies. That's because a wolf subspecies and a dog breed are not the same thing at all, for a dog fancy or zoological standpoint. They do not belong in this template. And if they are not in this template the template does not belong on the pages. Indeed, check the guidelines for navboxes; navboxes are supposed to give reciprocal links, meaning that the navbox is only supposed to go on articles listed in the navbox. That's why I also removed the {{Cryptozoology}} navbox from Hokkaido wolf, as there's no link to the article there. And because it's a large navbox who's very appearance gives WP:UNDUE weight to a WP:FRINGE viewpoint, one that is completely unsourced in the article. As extraordinary claims require proof, I have removed it entirely. Therefore the cryptozoology box really doesn't belong to be there at all. oknazevad (talk) 15:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]