User talk:Векочел

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

The article Khalid bin Saud Al Saud (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:36, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note Wikipedia:Short description. Dates of office should not use the XXXX-XXXX format. They should be 'from XXXX to XXXX'. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:59, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John of Montfort, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Count of Montfort.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:59, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kategate, if it is convenient for you to do so. MSincccc (talk) 15:38, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing you peace, joy, and renewal this Easter season. Thank you for all you do to keep Wikipedia growing and thriving.

Stay well, and happy editing! MSincccc (talk) 18:45, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, and likewise the Easter season is going well for you! Векочел (talk) 10:27, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Diana died requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Smjg (talk) 08:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:LGBTQ Roman emperors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:35, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]