Hi, about the logo maybe I will do it later as I am busy developing the Johor article. Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. That is what I want to do too after I finish expanding the article. Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:33, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but most of the other table list will be trimmed soon like in the Sabah, Sarawak, Pahang and even Malaysia articles as to achieve a good article status we need to focus more on paragraph content. About the language, don't mind about that, my English is not perfect too. Molecule Extraction (talk) 13:08, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]
What do you mean by making the list "insufficient"? Even though there are less state flags in the table, readers still can see the comparison as I did not remove the density section. Per Wikipedia policy, there is no need for similar flags to be repeated many times in the table, this is not a football article. Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:53, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are doing a mistake again. Through the policy, that doesn't mean you need to remove all the state flags. Can you actually see the real comparison? We should just use one flag for recognition of each state. Another thing is that why don't we just mention the state name for once? No need to repeat it many times like the flag. See the comparison again. Then there is after your recent revert, all the modification to the East Malaysian state name also removed. Molecule Extraction (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Per Sorting guidelines, after reading this I do think the sorting problem can be fixed by making it unsortable, can you give it a try before I make the whole modification? We should stop from engaging reverting each other edits continuously as other patrollers will think that we are involved in edit war. I let you to do the test first and after that leave a response on my talkpage on what result did you get. Molecule Extraction (talk) 13:33, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think? Is it okay now? This is the same with the last modification by me except the table is now unsortable. Haha, OK, Ok, Sori lahh. Actually I was a bit shocked when after spending much time (for an half hour) to do the table modification (while still figuring what to do next for other errors that will occurred), then when I refresh the page suddenly all was going erased. I thought you are being disagree with any change to the article without a reason. Molecule Extraction (talk) 13:52, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Haha, alright. Yes, Wikipedian do always have a dispute even between those who come from the same country. But both of you guys also need to refrain from reverting each other and should discuss in the talkpage and work together as a teammate as both of you come from the same country (I think you and him are living in the state of Penang, am I correct?) Honestly, I also don't like to arguing with someone here over simple matters as I feel it is just wasting time. About the list, I think the Districts of Malaysia article already covering the population numbers. Molecule Extraction (talk) 15:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nowadays I have been rarely making a major work on list article. This year I need to spend more time to expand an article to achieve the GA status (Johor not finished yet). Which cities article list that you mean? There are plenty of them here. Molecule Extraction (talk) 15:32, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you on your correction for Sarawak. Actually I do note about the population in their state government website, but I'm stuck in the density and the district area size because their district articles are not even complete in Wikipedia with many red links. You can continue add the population numbers because I need to read several books now to continue the expansion on the article I want to develop as it's already been three days since I temporary skip on the article while doing other minor edits in other topics. Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@*angys*: I was going to start with the Locator maps and translation on request but I can't find it, and it's not in the archive. Do you know where it is, I need it to be able to do them. --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@*angys*: I saw it was back yesterday but when I needed it today it's gone again, what's going on? --Goran tek-en (talk) 14:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]
I faffed around with the colors a bit. I didn't use the color scheme in the map you sent because I wanted the background to have more contrast, though I still tried to make the colors brighter than before.
I'm very much not a graphic designer, so if you think the color scheme in the Chinese version is definitely better, I'll change it. SyahirSQRT2 (talk) 12:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I did try to apply the four color theorem for the map: the new map did distribute the 4 colors equally across the 12 districts. But I think you're right about the "too colorful and not friendly" part. The greater contrast could make people think there's some significance of one district over another, or something, and the background shouldn't be too explicit -- the borders, place names and cities may be more important.
I revised it (and so should the people in the Kampar district office -- why'd they remix the original, sans-LMS district label?). Also, I may be the author of that map, but couldn't anyone upload a newer version of it if think it helps? This is a collaborative encyclopedia, after all. SyahirSQRT2 (talk) 13:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi angys, thank you for your contributing in badminton related articles. I see that you add the birth place in some Malaysian badminton players. It would be nice if you also add source as references from your editing. Thank you Stvbastian (talk) 08:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Stvbastian. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Hi *angys*, please do not make any conclusions based solely on your personal understanding. Based on your editting in Ng Hui Lin and Ng Hui Ern pages, you said that "Since they represent that state, they should born at that place. Maybe Seremban or other town. But you have prove that they born at Kuala Lumpur? If no please use this." Those such statements are only guessing comprehension without a reliable source. In this case please read WP:BLP.
Representing a state in a competition doesn't mean the person born in that state. I'll give you an example: Lee Chong Wei was born in Bagan Serai, Perak, but in Sukma Games, he represented Penang. See: 1, 2.
Greetings. Please do not change my amendments to Penang Free School, SMK Hutchings, SK Francis Light, SK Hutchings and SK Wellesley. These are NOT Missionary schools and they were never Missionary schools from the very beginning. Thank you. ssquah (talk) 22:37, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for March 19[edit]
Hi *angys*! If I can I would like to ask you some favour. Since I see you are active on Chinese Wikipedia, can you make a translation of this article there? As it is weird when this Chinese World War II hero doesn't have its own article in his mother language, while Japanese already create such article. Hehe. Night Lantern (talk) 23:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Election manifestos in Malaysian general election, 2018. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Malaysian general election, 2018. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Malaysian general election, 2018. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Narutolovehinata5tccsdnew 10:34, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Results of the Malaysian general election, 2018[edit]
Hi, I have noticed you created a page titled - Results of the Malaysian general election, 2018. I am in the process of creating tables for both the parliament and state election results. These will be divided into the following:
Hello. On those three, I will try to do the first one slowly. The second and the third seems a bit hard. But I will still try to do it. Actually my friend currently using his computer more frequently in this month for his work (most of my graphics tool are located there), so I can only create SVG when I can use his computer. This also currently affects the current process to develop article since I can only do minor tasks through my tablet. Molecule Extraction (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done Actually all this mess related to copyright of Malaysian political parties, state or even city/towns symbols, government ministers pictures and also their meeting pictures etc. will be easier if the Malaysian government passed a special law regarding its use in Wikimedia Project or for other educational purposes like what we see in neighbouring countries of {{PD-IDGov}} (Indonesia), {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} (Philippines) and {{PD-TH-exempt}} (Thailand) but I don't think the government seems to care a lot over this simple matters as for now most complex logos (as well to what I have mentioned above) will be free only after 50 years (except to simple geometric shape and font symbols) while the "freest thing" will be only to government related documents as seen here {{PD-Malaysia}} which are similar to the law in {{PD-VietnamGov}} (Vietnam). Molecule Extraction (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, about the map colour consistency maybe you can ask someone in the Wikipedia:Graphics Lab/Map workshop. I'm sorry I can't do it at the moment because I need to update Sabah politician articles since I just see many of the articles references have been dead after been left for years. Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
About Sandakan, it is not very reddish because the percentage vote of Wong Tien Fatt is 48.0% (45%+) compared to Chan Foong Hin in Kota Kinabalu which is more reddish with 56.3% (55%+). About Penang and Klang Valley, it is very dark reddish since the percentage of vote especially to the Democratic Action Party (DAP) is more than 70% and 60% respectively. Molecule Extraction (talk) 05:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Where did the five hundreds total come from? Is it including the whole states of Malaysia like the Parliament numbers? Molecule Extraction (talk) 11:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think is 505 (Peninsular and Sabah)+82=587 angys (Talk Talk) 11:39, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I will do it tomorrow, today I'm not in my friend computer. Sorry for not being able to do it today. Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:08, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping to expand Malaysian election articles. Your help are very much appreciated. Molecule Extraction (talk) 10:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to upload or edit my uploads on openclipart. You're also welcome to edit the parliamentary map also. Derkommander0916 (talk) 18:24, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi *angys*, there seems to be some confusion in regards to assigning a colour template to parties like PPBM, DAP, PKR and AMANAH. Why are we using one colour for all the parties. We have been using different colours for the parties since 2008.Lazybugger13A (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My apologies, but if I may add to this argument. These parties contested in a de facto coalition known as Pakatan Harapan. Also, what is different this time is that all the four parties contested under one single banner (that of the PKR), unlike in the previous elections where each of the opposition parties had campaigned with separate emblems.[1] In light of these recent developments, using a single color scheme for the four parties would seem appropriate, IMHO. Vnonymous (talk) 00:12, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the contest was using the PKR logo, because the Registrar of Societies didn't approve the Pakatan Harapan. So in the last minute they used the PKR logo. This is not about the election contest but who is sitting in the parliament and the state assemblies. But they are all belonging from different parties - PKR, AMANAH, PPBM and DAP. They are part of a loose coalition which is Pakatan Harapan. I hope that clears this matter.
Also I would like to add that PAS is the only winner for Gagasan Sejahtera. No other party in GS won other than PAS. We should just stick with PAS party colours.Lazybugger13A (talk) 02:01, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of the motives and circumstances behind the single logo used by Pakatan Harapan, the fact remains that all four parties contested using one symbol. Did Amanah campaign using its banner? Ditto to DAP and PPBM. So a single color scheme to reflect this move should be adopted. It should also be noted that those Barisan Nasional representatives are from different parties as well - UMNO, MCA, MIC, Gerakan and so on.
Yes, PAS is the only party in the Gagasan Sejahtera coalition to have won seats. So is UMNO in the Barisan Nasional (the two BN seats are won by UMNO).
And have you read MOS:DUPLINK? What does this proviso say: ... if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead? Vnonymous (talk) 03:07, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Vnonymous:@Lazybugger13A:IMHO, Seen but it is after I clear the link. And for me Peninsular Pakatan Harapn use light blue for this time, Sabah Sarawak keep using their party colour. Maybe next election they can use Pakatan Harapan logo and to that time we can use red for them. Gagasan Sejahtera uses PAS symbol, so I think they should use green too and for BN since they still a “party” in the EC namelist, just keep it as BN-UMNO. BN also have 1 MCA seat and PBB in East Malaysia, not all UMNO. angys (Talk Talk) 05:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Vnonymous:@*angys*:, I don't disagree with the fact that all parties used the same logo. Every party has their own logo, but they didn't use it when they agreed to use the PKR logo during the elections. But that doesn't mean they have agreed to used the PKR logo after the elections. (which negates using the PKR colour template - light blue). The colour scheme for Pakatan Harapan logo is orange, just to let you know. It's not light blue, for the Pakatan logo or colour template. So I suggest we return to the status quo and have all Pakatan Harapan parties use their own colour templates. Once we have the ROS approve the coalition Pakatan Harapan, we can move forward and decide the colour for all 4 parties to use. Now pointing to UMNO, MCA, GERAKAN and MIC, etc that they use the same colour, proves my point. They use the same logo (same colour template), and that coalition has been contesting the last 14th elections (with the exception the Alliance coalition before 1969) They already are approved by the Registrar of Societies. I hope this clears the situation. I in fact was using a same colour template for Pakatan Rakyat in 2008, but was came to a consensus with other editors to use different colour templates for Pakatan Rakyat parties. Hope this makes this more clearer.
The Gagasan Sejahtera colour scheme is too dark. People won't be able to read the words in the template clearly. That is one of the reasons why I suggested we should use a lighter green colour. The PAS template colour was chosen because it was just the right colour.Lazybugger13A (talk) 05:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lazybugger13A:, you can either put the font become white or go to adjust on this page. For PH, since they use PKR flag for election, we should use light blue. After they has been reconized, then we turn into this colour.East Malaysia also same. angys (Talk Talk) 05:55, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@*angys*:, that is just what I said awhile ago. The Registrar of Societies has not recognised Pakatan Harapan at the moment. They have a common logo, but this is also not recognised. This is a loose coalition right now. All four parties are equal and that is why we should use the different colour templates to differentiate them for the time being. The light blue template is just confusing and just follows PKR. PKR's colour is not the same as the Pakatan Harapan logo. Only once we have an official recognition of the Pakatan Harapan by ROS, we then can use a reddish or orange colour.
For the Gagasan Sejahtera colour template, we should use a lighter green colour.Lazybugger13A (talk) 06:38, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with @*angys*: on this. When Pakatan Harapan switches to another logo somewhere down the road, the color template can be adjusted too. What is certain is that the elected representatives of the four Pakatan Harapan parties contested (and won) under a single logo. My point is a standardised color scheme for the four parties should be adopted. If representatives from UMNO, MCA, MIC, Gerakan, etc all share a single color scheme, I don't see why those from Amanah, DAP, PKR and PPBM cannot. Yes, the representatives from UMNO, MCA, MIC, Gerakan, etc contested under the BN banner, but the individuals are members of the component parties as well, ie UMNO, MCA, MIC, Gerakan, etc.
In fact, a single standard color for the four Pakatan parties would be less confusing. As it is, there is a table at the lead of the List of Malaysian State Assembly Representatives (2018–) article, which displays the colors of the coalitions involved.
I am not going to dwell further on this rather petty business of color selection. Will leave it to the consensus of the editors. But my point is, better to standardise the colors of the Pakatan Harapan component parties. Vnonymous (talk) 09:00, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@*angys*:@Vnonymous:, yes I agree using the same colour would be less confusing. But my stand is that will happen down the line, when Pakatan Harapan is officially recognised by the Registrar of Societies. Then we can use a colour similar to the Pakatan Harapan logo, which is reddish or orange in colour.(not the light blue that is being used at the moment) The argument that UMNO, MCA, MIC, Gerakan, etc contesting under the BN banner is just that. BN is recognised by the ROS, and that is why we have use same colour scheme for pass election tables and articles since 2008. I would rather other editors chime in on this issue so we can some to a consensus. But at the moment we should just stick with separate colours for DAP, AMANAH, PKR and PPBM. For the Gagasan Sejahtera colour template, it should be lighter in colour, not dark green. Lazybugger13A (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
BTW guys, anyone have a time to update all related articles in this two templates?
I am going to change the colour to be more in tune with the Pakatan Harapan logo - #CC2200 -Template:PH (2018)/meta/color My original stance with the colour template for Pakatan Harapan is that all the four parties should still stick with their current colour templates. But since there is no consensus in making that happen, I will leave it as it is. All four component parties will have the same colour palette. I am also going to lighten the Gagasan Sejahtera colour palette to a lighter green colour. Lazybugger13A (talk) 13:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have change the PH colour template to red. The PKR template is still light blue. Hope that clears up some misunderstanding. Lazybugger13A (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lazybugger13A: Is it done by a mistake since I saw you change {{PH (2018)/meta/color}} to red and when I saw your comment said it is a mistake so I return it to blue? Sorry for interrupting again but everytime I refresh the Malaysian general election, 2018 article, the colour frequently change to red, blue, red, blue. My eyes going to *blink*, *blink*. 555. Please guys, find a quick consensus on this simple issue as other readers also would feel the same thing like me when they read the article. Molecule Extraction (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Molecule Extraction:, it's fine right now. *angys* managed to come up with a lighter red colour. I just read the latest news that the ROS is now in the process to officially recognising the Pakatan Harapan coalition. Hope we don't have this type of confusion over colours in the future.Lazybugger13A (talk) 14:20, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Lazybugger13A and Vnonymous:Since them has use has approve for PH, next time pleae use the Pakatan Harapan/meta/color or shading template instead of PH (2018) that for PKR flag election use only. If you really dont like you can go ahead change the name but please didt change the wikicode inside it.:) angys (Talk Talk) 14:25, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
angys*, if you are using the PH (2018)/meta/color for the PKR colour template, I suggest you use this template - People's Justice Party (Malaysia)/meta/color. To label it as PH (2018) is confusing to other editors as PH is denoted as Pakatan Harapan.Lazybugger13A (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind, our budiman editors will know it since thier logo is red. This template for GE14 PKR flag purpose only. After that Anwar may get a by election and probably they use Pakatan Harapan flag and for that time we use Pakatan Harapan meta template loor. angys (Talk Talk) 14:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK guys, now Pakatan Harapan is officially recognised by RoS, so I have change the colour to its official colour as they use in their website. I hope there is no more issues arise after this. Molecule Extraction (talk) 06:45, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speaking of Chronology of the Malaysian Expressway System, I removed the {{hoax}} tag you added in November. Why should this article/list be a hoax? When using {{hoax}}, it is always a good idea to discuss one's concerns on the article talk page with other editors. Regards, SamSailor 10:50, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lake of references. The prankster may add totally wrong info in the past. angys (Talk Talk) 10:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Lack of references is not a reason for adding {{hoax}} tag. If you think wrong information has been added to the list, remove it. I suppose most entires could be referenced, especially for one who speaks Malay. SamSailor 11:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC) P.S. I moved your reply from my talk page to avoid fragmentation.[reply]
Members of the Dewan Rakyat, 14th Malaysian Parliament[edit]
Please do not undo my changes. I have added citations to the independent candidates joining PKR, as well as updated the tables. PH and Warisan are not formally in a coalition and therefore should not be combined.
I changed it from 3 tables to 2 tables because 1 was redundant. There should be 1 for official results as of 10 May, and another for the current state which should be kept updated as MPs switch allegiance. No need for a 3rd.
Please do not undo my changes just to revert to red. I thought the light blue was more appropriate but red is fine by me. That can be done without undoing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skisagooner (talk • contribs) 10:35, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Finas.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:14, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The current President, ie, the leader of the MCA, is still Liow Tiong Lai until he steps down or not to contest the post of President in the coming party election.
He said it would be his last officiating Kojadi's 36th AGM as the President, but as it is now, he is still the President while Wee Ka Siong is the deputy.
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:28, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have reverted the PKR logo colour in the election box to the PH logo colour. The info on the PKR campaigning using their own logo is listed in the election section. Thanks.Lazybugger13A (talk) 12:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Pakatan Harapan has officially been recognised by the SM. For all political parties we should stick with PH colours for PKR, DAP, Amanah and PPBM. PKR is not contesting on their own. They are contesting under the PH banner. They are only using the PKR logo until constituents will get familiar with the PH logo in the future. I hope that clears this matter.Lazybugger13A (talk) 14:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Until they have left Pakatan Harapan, then you can revert to using the PKR colours in the election boxes. Lazybugger13A (talk) 14:33, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We are not following the vote or ballot paper. The ballot paper only has the PKR logo. They are still part of the PH coalition and UMNO is still part of Barisan Nasional. That should be self-explanatory.Lazybugger13A (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, that was from an old file. Here is the latest electoral boundary map for the Bangi which includes Balakong. I did a bit of tweaking here and there. If you want to change the colour, please feel free to edit and then upload your latest version. File:Bangi, Selangor Electoral District.jpg ThanksLazybugger13A (talk) 06:06, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
French
Deutsch
Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC) 
Honestly, I also don't like to arguing with someone here over simple matters as I feel it is just wasting time. 
About the list, I think the Districts of Malaysia article already covering the population numbers. Molecule Extraction (talk) 15:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC) 
Actually I do note about the population in their state government website, but I'm stuck in the density and the district area size because their district articles are not even complete in Wikipedia with many red links. You can continue add the population numbers because I need to read several books now to continue the expansion on the article I want to develop as it's already been three days since I temporary skip on the article while doing other minor edits in other topics. Molecule Extraction (talk) 12:48, 19 January 2018 (UTC) 
Done, already recover to latest request version. angys (Talk Talk) 14:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC) 
Hello, I'm Stvbastian. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Hi *angys*, please do not make any conclusions based solely on your personal understanding. Based on your editting in Ng Hui Lin and Ng Hui Ern pages, you said that "Since they represent that state, they should born at that place. Maybe Seremban or other town. But you have prove that they born at Kuala Lumpur? If no please use this." Those such statements are only guessing comprehension without a reliable source. In this case please read WP:BLP. 
Hehe. Night Lantern (talk) 23:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC) 
Everything is done now. 
Done 
- PH
People's Justice Party (PKR)
Molecule Extraction (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
![[1]](https://pre00.deviantart.net/5998/th/pre/f/2011/285/4/b/jackie_chan_by_rober_raik-d4cly01.png){kind=link}
![[2]](http://www.oogazone.com/wp-content/uploads/hd-meme-jackie-chan-wide-image.jpg){kind=link}
