User talk:2605:B40:1302:6C00:3CEE:CFC5:ED95:AA85

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Tipton Hotel, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tipton Hotel. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• You were asked to discuss on the talk page several times. See wp:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. Get wp:consensus before making any more edits. Use help:Notifications to inform other editors. Adakiko (talk) 23:34, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tipton Hotel. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Adakiko (talk) 22:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at adakiko's talk page. Adakiko (talk) 22:57, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read Skywatcher68's edit summary? Please discuss on the talk page. I removed your fancruft tag. See help:talk pages. Adakiko (talk) 23:05, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't mean there isn't excessive detail. (A whole section for inconsistencies? Really?) 2605:B40:1302:6C00:3CEE:CFC5:ED95:AA85 (talk) 23:28, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]