French
DeutschUser talk:CSMention269
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
| This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Hi. No problem with the lead sources I will add these. But for the Early life section I am unsure what sources I should have for this when it says “ Details about White’s early life, education, and career prior to his advocacy work are not publicly available”
Wdm001
Wdm001 (talk) 09:04, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
- Kindly remove the section, when you do not have those information, don't need to mention that. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 11:51, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Draft:Lindsay Levin
[edit]Hi CSMention269, thanks so much for your review. Please excuse my ignorance, but I don't understand what is wrong with the citations? Please can you advise. Viljowf (talk) 08:44, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
- If you have any link to the book references (such as those in Google books), put the links using Visual Editor and the citations will automatically be formed. Also using the Visual Editor you can create and edit the citations if you want, by clicking the citation no./icon and click "edit" next. Read WP:REFBEGIN ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 09:55, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
ANI
[edit]No need to waste time at ANI with that thread. My issue is separate than that so carrying on here. Hoping you can take accountability for your statements. Otherwise, I will need to start a new ANI thread. Your accusation, insinuated or direct, is not acceptable in Wikipedia. CNMall41 (talk) 15:47, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- @CNMall41, I didn't accuse you or the admin, in ANI, or in my AFC comment. Although I made some incorrect phrases which it created a confusion. I got my point that it does not matter whether your nationality or ethinicity matters (for expertise), while reviewing a draft. We need to state facts here and follow Wikipedia policy. The sock user created mess. And later other users did mess, causing the page and its' disamb SALTed. I got that as well.
- I tried to appeal in removing the move protection in ANI. I tagged you for one reason, to inform you. Guess that my replies did backfire. I will be responsible next time, and be very careful to ensure that such akward incidents do not repeat again, otherwise it would challenge my competency in this project I'm working here. However I withdrawn my request for appeal so I won't talk about this particular subject further. Thanks. --☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:20, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- I believe that is my issue. You state "incorrect phrases which it created a confusion." You then avoid and go right to why you filed the ANI. I am on the subject about you insinuating that myself and others are incompetent because of our race/nationality/etc. It did not create confusion, it was a direct statement about other editors. I will drop the stick but we live in 2025 where judging people is not acceptable. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- I appologise, for this disrespect, that I should not have used "I" word in the first place. I didn't expected that I would make offence indirectly. I take that responsibility as I realise this issue could lose my privileges of editing in Wikipedia. Frankly speaking, I was suddenly influenced by that user who called you the "w" word during a conflict. And I thought why would CN do this, not realising this is not who am I. I judge based on facts, that the subject is notable per NFF. But this "I" word caused more trouble. Don't you worry, you won't expect this irrational behavior from me next time. Have a good day CNMall41. --☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- It's all good. Thank you for the apology. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:40, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- I appologise, for this disrespect, that I should not have used "I" word in the first place. I didn't expected that I would make offence indirectly. I take that responsibility as I realise this issue could lose my privileges of editing in Wikipedia. Frankly speaking, I was suddenly influenced by that user who called you the "w" word during a conflict. And I thought why would CN do this, not realising this is not who am I. I judge based on facts, that the subject is notable per NFF. But this "I" word caused more trouble. Don't you worry, you won't expect this irrational behavior from me next time. Have a good day CNMall41. --☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(😐 ● 🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- I believe that is my issue. You state "incorrect phrases which it created a confusion." You then avoid and go right to why you filed the ANI. I am on the subject about you insinuating that myself and others are incompetent because of our race/nationality/etc. It did not create confusion, it was a direct statement about other editors. I will drop the stick but we live in 2025 where judging people is not acceptable. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:29, 11 June 2025 (UTC)