User talk:Cyrobyte

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

It's unfortunate that JGageW didn't include an edit summary, but unless I'm missing some subtlety, he was correct in removing the pKa value from the chembox. He brought it up on the talk page some days previously. Lavateraguy (talk) 19:40, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was wrong in reverting his edit and have self-reverted. I did it instinctually because it was deletion of material with no summary but I should not have given his explanation on the talk page. I am sorry about that. Cyrobyte (talk) 19:43, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In the spirit of WP:BITE (it was his 3rd edit) I think you should consider offering him an apology. (I have dropped a note on his talk page to the effect that blank edit summaries have negative associations.) Lavateraguy (talk) 20:31, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WikiUser777618 (talk) 23:08, 30 July 2025 (UTC) NCCIH WikiUser777618 (talk) Hi, I just published an edit to the NCCIH page, which you reverted in 6 seconds. It's not possible to read the content of the page to know if it was more or less a neutral POV. Could you please restore the work I did and give it genuine consideration?[reply]

I did not revert it. User:MrOllie did. Also, it was reverted after 6 minutes, not 6 seconds. Cyrobyte (talk) 23:11, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my bad sorry! I'm new to Wikipedia, thank you for your help. Do you have any advice for how to get a third opinion on if its a neutral point of view or not? WikiUser777618 (talk) 23:16, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can request a third opinion on the article's talk page by writing about there and then adding it to the "Active disagreements" section at Wikipedia:Third opinion. Cyrobyte (talk) 23:23, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thank you! WikiUser777618 (talk) 23:31, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]