French
DeutschUser talk:Delicate ve precious
Welcome!
[edit]Hi Delicate ve precious! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing!
You will need to use talk:Criticism of Muhammad to argue that the challenges to the present text that you cited are themselves reliably sources and that consequently the section of the article as it stands fails the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view policy. If you want to reuse the text that you attempted to add to the article, you can retrieve it from the article history. You will need to be careful to distinguish between your own analysis (which is not acceptable) and that of the sources you cite.
This is the only effective route to getting the article changed. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks
- I will use the talk page if necessary but the information I added was crucial to fulfill Wikipedia's policy of neutrality.
- All sources are reliable then I can't understand why that person has reverted my edit without pointing out a single unreliable resource, by just simply stating that I might be a sockpuppet. Others might have tried to add what I added because it is necessary to add that . Delicate ve precious (talk) 07:22, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Delicate ve precious (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What I added in that section is a necessary piece of information. I have no doubt that someone else who have knowledge might also have added this but this doesn't proof that I am a sock puppet. I request to please see carefully that what has been added into the article is a crucial historical fact without which full context of the section can't be clarified. I request an immediate unblock Delicate ve precious (talk) 07:27, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:42, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.