User talk:DungeonSiegeAddict510

This user may have left Wikipedia. DungeonSiegeAddict510 has not edited Wikipedia since January 2016. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Yay! Someone gave me a WikiHand... er, a welcome message! --The Defender of Light >Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing Inventory 23:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully:
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Acroterion (talk) 01:13, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

uwotm8 --The Defender of Light Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 01:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Gamergate controversy for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:45, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

kthx --The Defender of Light Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 03:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop posting links to various things that allege wrong doing of living persons mentioned on the project without any actual proof. This violates WP:BLP. If you persist in adding this content to Wikipedia, you will likely be blocked.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I do still have the edits in the history though. And since, quite frankly, editing some pages when a few users are lording over it, is to say, quite a pain. Best of luck with that gamergate thing... speaking of... time to write UnNews. --The Defender of Light Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 06:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Presently, your signature violates many of the guidelines set out at WP:Signatures. It does not include your username here and on my end it takes up 5 lines of markup on my screen which is also against guidelines. Please truncate your signature formatting, because I'm fairly certain you're not allowed to use a separate template for it anyway.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Its not getting any shorter than it is now. only shortened it because I have nothing better to do. I want the reference to the DS/DSII class in there. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 07:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also my edit saved at midnight. Your argument is invalid. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 07:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You don't call dubs on UTC time. And I still see like 4 lines of signature.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 07:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm on a 12~ inch netbook, and i'm seeing 3 lines. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 08:27, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, its one line, now scram. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 08:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My god, some people don't seem to be busy enough - they start complaining about other people's signature... yikes! I see exactly five words in the sig, followed by the date. --Maxl (talk) 15:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is the length of the signature in the editing window.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me about it. --Grand Warlock Danzathel Aetherwing >Inventory< 04:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're not allowed to use templates for signatures either and your signature still does not include your screenname "DungeonSiegeAddict510" which it is required to under the signature policy.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:40, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is DungeonSiegeAddict510's signature. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:55, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• DungeonSiegeAddict510, if you do not alter your signature to follow policy, I will block you from editing. Everyone else on the project has figured out how to conform to this requirement; you need to to. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Butts. --DSA510 Pls No Hate 23:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC) (does this work)[reply]

Yes, much better. Striking doesn't remove it but I was also more redactive than necessary out of caution. Thanks for your help.. --DHeyward (talk) 07:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I didn't get it at first, but now yeah, I should wait for RS to say something... hopefully. --DSA510 Pls No Hate 07:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what is going on in that section. I was just trying to explain why I removed the 4chan ban claim and suggest a couple sources along with quotes from those sources that the editor could use if they wanted to work the claim back in to the article. The 'open arms' quote is from the article not my opinion. — Strongjam (talk) 01:37, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#GamerGate and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for arbitration;
• Wikipedia:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, and all that good stuff. --DSA510 Pls No Hate 01:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DungeonSiegeAddict510. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is Thread link.
Message added 05:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Tutelary (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which one's him? I'd be disheartened if he's involved - he seemed fairly neutral in all this. Random the Scrambled ^(?) 05:40, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He was mentioned several times. What I think they wanted to do was pass on sources to him somehow. --DSA510 Pls No Hate 05:45, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that, but was he actively working with them, or were they just preparing to fill his talk page with the links they posted, unbeknownst to him? Random the Scrambled ^(?) 05:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure, to be honest, I guess I was thinking out loud and didn't realize it... I'll take another look at that thread. --DSA510 Pls No Hate 05:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding Jimbo to the list. He is not part of the dispute.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 21:08, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Under what proof is he not involved? He's commented multiple times on this. --DSA510 Pls No H8 21:10, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not an arbitrator or a clerk, but I am an uninvolved administrator. Please don't continue edit-warring. If you must, you can add to you own statement to explain why you think Wales should be a party. But edit-warring is disruptive, and if you continue, I will block you for a short period of time to prevent further disruption (and if I don't, another admin probably will). Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:25, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tarc has brought your conduct to the administrator Dreadstar's talk page. See User_talk:Dreadstar. Just a notification, I think it's polite to let people know that they're being discussed somewhere else. Tutelary (talk) 20:22, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be getting a bit wound up, I get it, I've been there over this, but It doesn't help and you could get in trouble. Just try and chill out and maybe move on for a bit, it's not worth getting annoyed over, it's protected now so not much is going to happen anyway. Stay happy pal :) HalfHat 20:31, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tensions are high right now... and I'm beginning to suspect foul play at hand. Anyways, I hope some action happens. I just wanna edit my KDE pages :( --DSA510 Pls No H8 21:01, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand feeling frustrated, like I said I've been there, but getting mad can only just make things worse. If there really is something going on, there's not a lot either of us could do anyway, certainly not without solid evidence anyway. Maybe just take a brake from the article and work on other things, at least until it opens back up. HalfHat 21:11, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please clarify on your comment in Talk:Gamergate controversy regarding the "smearing"? — Strongjam (talk) 18:35, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Slanted against the pro-gamergate side would work. And again, even if joystiq's thing is accurate, it is very vague, and does not specifically name what the CEO guy was actually talking about, concerning gamergate. --DSA510 Pls No H8 18:37, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please be more careful with your tone then? I thought perhaps you were claiming I was smearing people. Also, the struck-out text with comments about gawker don't seem very helpful, and have the potential to cause disruption. You also accidentally deleted someone else comment in that diff, probably an edit conflict. — Strongjam (talk) 19:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair. --DSA510 Pls No H8 19:17, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If everyone of us was asked to cut back ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]) you have to too. You're at like 1000 words. You don't get to have an exception when the rest of us aren't allowed that either.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:01, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A clerk will let you know if your statements needs to be cut back. --DHeyward (talk) 02:05, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

He added 6k worth of text to the page after half of the other participants were told by an arbitrator to cut everything back. He needs to cut back like the rest of us, just like Mr. Random needs to stop clerking. And that claim that my edits to Adland need to be looked at is ridiculous.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 02:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I have filed a sanction request in regards to your behavior involving the Gamergate articles [13]--137.111.13.200 (talk) 05:00, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, DungeonSiegeAddict510. I'm an arbitration clerk, which means I help manage and administer the arbitration process (on behalf of the committee). Thank you for making a statement in an arbitration request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#GamerGate. However, we ask all participants and commentators to limit the size of their initial statements to 500 words. Your statement significantly exceeds this limit. Please reduce the length of your statement when you are next online. If the case is accepted, you will have the opportunity to present more evidence; and concise, factual statements are much more likely to be understood and to influence the decisions of the Arbitrators.

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. However I currently only have a phone to work on, so reviewing and trimming is a bit impractical, and would probably nuke half of the statements. Sorry for the inconvenience. --DSA510 Pls No H8 04:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've stated before. Once the article for gamergate, and related pages become neutral, and stop violating BLP, I'll edit all/most of the KDE articles, which many of are worryingly subpar. Yes, I give off the nature of an SPA, as others have called me, but that is my own innate nature, to focus on one topic of interest, until it is exhausted. Note my contributions already list some edits to KDE pages. As a gesture, once I get on a proper computer, I'll heavily revamp one KDE page, to show I am not just here for gamergate. However, until the aforementioned is resolved, one way or the other, I cannot properly focus on the other articles, when there is one already in my attention. If, I am permitted to stay, I promise you I would help out in other areas of the wiki, but asking me to change how my mind works is, well a bit unreasonable. I'll keep the drama low, if possible. Hopefully that sanction request and doxxing are the only things that anti-gg does to me. --DSA510 Pls No H8 04:33, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

involved.    Thank you. 

Hello, DungeonSiegeAddict510. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 05:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Tutelary (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did they seriously dox you? If so, that's awful. That's the worst thing I've ever had to experience myself on Wikipedia. AND FOR SIMPLY EDITING WIKIPEDIA you are their public enemy #1. This is despicable and nasty and just words can't describe how bad it is. I'm sorry that that's happened and I hope that you are alright, and to report each and every threat to the police in hopes that maybe one of these foul people will get their comeuppance. Seriously, this is not alright. Tutelary (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah if that's the case, I'm really really sorry. HalfHat 23:25, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. I've done far worse stuff on uncyc, (which i have apologized for and learnt from), but never was i doxxed... (Someone snagged a photo of me which i didnt know even existed! But they took it down). Yet, trying to play devil's advocate and pushing NPOV, warrants a dox and SWATting threats. If i didn't have a card up my sleeve to play against either side i would never have even considered dipping my toes into this mess, seeing as GNAA, AnonOps, and SA Goonsquad, among others are involved (weird twitter is in on it too). If I get SWATted, I'd play that card. Seeing as the 5's No True Scotsman card works on anti-gg too, it would be fun to see such a suspicious narrative crumble. I'm NEUTRAL, and get doxxed, by someone claiming to be anti-gg. The amount of doublethink and hypocrisy going on is tempting me to go pro, but I'm going to remain neutral, only an observer of pro-gg doings. Honestly, if Ryulong or someone else got doxxed I'd instantly try to help them however possible. I haven't condoned the harassment/bullying involved in this, and I never will. However, as i said in the latest addendum to my statement on ArbCom, and considering how severe actual doxxing could be, I find it... oddly amusing that, through my own research, what could simply be called a third party gathering wikidiffs, is doxxing. I've read the threads, anything close to a dox, is noticably condemned and reported (i hope they do what they say), by the other anonymous posters. I'm sure if /r/GamerGhazi on the antigg side actually helped out in hunting down third party trolls, rather than reflecting the relationship between RationalWiki and Conservapedia with the pro-gg /r/KotakuInAction, there would be less "controversy" in the GamerGate Controversy. To summarize, I, a neutral party observing pro-gg, have been doxxed and threatened by one claiming to represent anti-gg, and I'm ready to make it a phyrric victory for whoever did it's side if this escalates into real life. --DSA510 Pls No H8 23:41, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your going through hell at the moment. I hope you're OK. HalfHat 13:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Legal_threats_by_DungeonSiegeAddict510. Thanks. Avono (talk) 12:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"I can't imagine what 20k+ group of diverse peoples who are fed up with the status quo GamerHate sockpuppets, have to gain from harassing 3 women for 3+ months." Thank you, you made my day! Racuce (talk) 06:36, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm from uncyc. I do what I can to spice things up. --DSA510 Pls No H8 06:53, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP DIGGING YOUR OWN GRAVES :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Really. Please stop with the uncivil comments. Dreadstar ☥ 02:15, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Hasteur: did you just forge Dreadstar's signature? Anyways, I'm on break until tomorrow evening. Need to calm down... --DSA510 Pls No H8 03:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia silences victims of doxxing

• I don't see any such headlines. Please be advised that the topic ban extends to your talk page as well. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:03, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I liked the part about the kangaroo court. --DSA510 Pls No H8 22:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Now, here's another useful link. Have a look at WP:COLOR and look at the different color pickers, and what they have to say about the colors in your signature: for many visually impaired readers, it is illegible. I'm not all that impaired, and for me it's almost illegible. The relevant requirement is WP:SIGAPP; please adapt it as soon as possible. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:00, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd recommend going around to all the user talk pages you posted notices to and adding that you have withdrawn your accusations. Dreadstar ☥ 02:14, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have opened a new request for Enforcement at Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Gamergate/Requests_for_enforcement speicifcally citing your "Kangaroo Courts" AN/I thread and your further expansion in the ArbCom case request page. Your are invited to enter a statement explaining why the enforcement action should be turned down. Hasteur (talk) 03:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, DSA510. I saw your post on WP:ANI requesting a week-long block (you said ban, but I think you meant block). ANI is not the right place to ask, and most admins won't place self-requested blocks, but there are a few who will. There's a list of them here; I'm on it, as you can see. But perhaps you've had time to change your mind, in view of the posts above? If you still do want a block, you can read my conditions here, and indicate that you accept them, here or on my page, and I'll block you. But only ask for a block from me if you're sure about it, because you won't be unblocked on request. You may want to look at other admins on the list too, because the conditions vary a little. Regards, Bishonen | talk 21:26, 24 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Trust me. Last time they were pretty close to banning you. This time, they'll go all out. I wouldn't do it, as the drama boards are essentially ruled by mobs. Count yourself a bit lucky that you got 90 days instead of indefinite. Tutelary (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I should have notified you when I moved MB's post, sorry, but here is the since closed discussion involving you: Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Gamergate/Requests_for_enforcement#RE:_8chan.2C_DungeonSiegeAddict510_and_Loganmac starship.paint ~ regal 05:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did an informal AMA on 8chan to see what the fuss was about. --DSA510 Pls No H8 18:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Evidence. Please add your evidence by December 11, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 22:27, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 23:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As brought up by Ryulong, you should change your header to "Evidence presented by DungeonSiegeAddict510", and keep a serious tone, you don't want jokes to subtract to any points you're making or get on the wrong side or the Arbitrators. HalfHat 20:21, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, if you want Arbcom to take you seriously, take the discussion seriously. That last bit seems really unlikely to impress, and it seems kinda POINT-y to me to use the Workshop proposal space like that. 76.64.35.209 (talk) 01:51, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's exactly what a gamerhate supporter would say. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 02:21, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For amazing contributions to the field of memetics. Bosstopher (talk) 01:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The arbs are leaning toward a doubling of the usual limits on evidence for this specific case. I am still waiting for final sign-off, but it seems likely that most participants will not need to trim evidence. Three relevant points:

• Given the substantial increase in limits, the usual acceptance if counts go a bit over will not be granted. Treat the limits as absolute.
• The limits apply to both direct evidence and rebuttal to others.
• Despite the increase, it is highly desirable to be as succinct as possible. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 17:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GARRRRGARRR GARLUM --DSA510 Pls No Bully 04:32, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This [14] edit by you from today was a rather clear-cut violation of your current topic ban (from "all edits and all discussions related to the Gamergate controversy") [15]. I also note that on the Arbcom pages, where you are allowed to participate despite your topic ban only by way of exception, and only for the narrow purpose of appealing your sanction, you have been misusing the proceedings for engaging in free debate about the contents of the gamergate issue, and submitted frivolous pseudo-proposals [16].

You are blocked for one week. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:41, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how I violated a topic ban. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 23:56, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@The Devil's Advocate: is removing a BLP violato source, from an article unrelated to gamerhate, really a topic ban violation? I want a second opinion. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 05:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't play dumb. It was an edit to a section about 8chan, which is about as closely connected to Gamergate as it gets, and the ref you removed had "Gamergate" right up in its title, so obviously this was an edit related to Gamergate. Whether the ref is problematic in terms of BLP is neither here nor there; if you are topic-banned you are not supposed to edit it but leave it to others to sort out. (And at first sight I certainly don't see anything that obviously marks it as a BLP vio; I also note the ref has been in the main 8chan article and seems not to have been challenged there.) Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:40, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That my userpage and talkpage are protected from IPs until I am unbanned. I'm still being threatened, and wouldn't rather like my dox plastered on my userpage and talkpage. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 16:15, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done, for the remaining days of the current block (or did you mean for the full time of your topic ban?) BTW, please rest assured that the recent vandal edit by an IP here was quite unrelated to you; it's some insane person whose harassment target just happens to be me, so he'll just randomly revert me wherever I happen to edit. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, just for my block. And I'm worried since the anti-gg people are still threatening me, despite my ban and block. I hope it doesn't escalate... --DSA510 Pls No Bully 23:04, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the interests of making this case more easily manageable, it is likely that we will prune the parties list to limit it to those against whom evidence has been submitted. Therefore, if anyone has anything to add, now is the time to do so.

See the list of parties not included in the evidence as of 8 Dec 14.

Please note that the purpose of the /Evidence page is to provide narrative, context and all the diffs. As diffs can usually be interpreted in various ways, to avoid ambiguity, they should be appended to the allegation that's being made. If the material is private and the detail has been emailed to ArbCom, add [private evidence] instead of diffs.

The /Workshop page builds on evidence. FOFs about individual editors should contain a summary of the allegation made in /Evidence, and diffs to illustrate the allegation. Supplying diffs makes it easier for the subject of the FOF to respond and much easier for arbitrators to see whether your FOF has substance.

No allegations about other editors should be made either in /Evdence or in the /Workshop without supporting diffs. Doing so may expose you to findings of making personal attacks and casting aspersions.

Also, please note that the evidence lengths have been increased from about 1000 words and about 100 diffs for parties and about 500 words and about diffs for non-parties to a maximum of 2000 words and 200 diffs for parties and 1000 words and 100 diffs for non-parties. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC) Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

As you are currently blocked and topic banned you may submit evidence by email to the Committee for it to be posted publicly on the evidence page. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:40, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

I have blocked you because since your last block expired, you have done nothing but contribute silliness to arbitration pages. Further, although arbitration pages are excepted from your topic ban, the purpose of that exception is to allow you to contribute to the dispute resolution process, not to re-hash content disputes. Frankly, it seems to me—and I've been observing your conduct for a while—that you are not here to contribute to the encyclopaedia. For the avoidance of doubt, this block is an ordinary admin action, and is not made under the provisions of the community sanctions. Any arb or clerk can lift or modify this block without any deference to me as they see fit. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

DungeonSiegeAddict510 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Just block me from the arbitration process. I don't want any further involvement in gamergate or related matters. I give up on it. Block me from the arbitration process and whatnot, and let me just edit other articles quietly. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 22:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

See below. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DSA should stay far away from the arbitration proceedings and the GamerGate topic in general for a long time, honestly, but I don't think an indefinite block is warranted. DSA has made some constructive edits unrelated to GamerGate so I think it is wrong to say he is not here to contribute to an encyclopedia.--The Devil's Advocate _{tlk. cntrb.} 01:50, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DSA, what, precisely, would you like to edit if you were unblocked? This isn't a straight "no", but I'm more than a little bit sceptical, given that less than 15% of your edits are to the mainspace and that, by my back-of-the-envelope maths, about two thirds of your edits are to the GamerGate talk page or noticeboard threads/arbitration pages relating to GamerGate. I need a little convincing that unblocking you is not asking for trouble. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:28, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly KDE articles. Maybe other things. I want nothing more to do with gamergate. It's caused me nothing but trouble. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 19:00, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell: I'll have a full reason in 6-7 hours. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 15:56, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@HJ Mitchell: I'd basically like to be unbanned to edit the KDE articles and such, since I did promise some people that I'd do that. I want no further involvement with the Gamergate page since, quite frankly, the damage has been done. Instead of deleting it when you had the chance, it was kept up. To what purpose? At least (to my count) 4 editors have been doxxed, if not harassed/threatened like I was, many other pages have turned into battlegrounds, many people have different (mostly negative) views of wikipedia now, among other things. Again, to what purpose? I should have realized this earlier. Anyways, I've already explained the situation to my informant, and made amends with her, so I have no real reason to edit any gg related article. I'll take it all off my watchlist. I don't need to do anything more, and I don't want to do anything more. Have any of my edits to non gg pages been bad/disruptive? Since I neither have obligation, need, or desire to touch gg on wikipedia, I don't think it would be harmful to let me improve KDE articles (among other FOSS things, and maybe random pages). --DSA510 Pls No Bully 00:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm late to the party, but I agree with your assessment of the situation—which is precisely why I'm blocking editors who contribute to the problem. I've unblocked you on condition that you avoid anything even remotely connected to GamerGate like the plague. If you don't, I will re-block you. I strongly recommend you focus on the mainspace rather than talk pages and noticeboards/arbitration proceedings. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:50, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been pestered about this before and I hate to pile on, but since you left a note on my talk page I couldn't help noticing that your colour choice makes it hard to read. #008000 on #800080 (hex values of 'green' and 'purple') has a contrast ratio of 1.8:1 which is well below the acceptable contrast level of 4.5:1. Here is a page with the contrast requirements of various text sizes and a calculator to tell you which colours work (more can be found at WP:COLOR). An idea would be to change 'green' to #0d0 (would look like DSA510) which would give a ratio of 5.1:1. Hope that helps. ekips39 00:25, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for the tip. --DSA510 Pls No Bully 00:48, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

CoolMUD

added a link pointing to Stephen White

MOO (programming language)

added a link pointing to Stephen White

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I'll get to it later™. And yes, I know this is a bot. --DSA510 Pls No RE 21:37, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I legitimately confused the "copy" and "paste" icons (still on a phone). I meant to copy "|programming language = C++ etc..." It was an honest accident. --DSA510 Pls No RE 19:07, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt anyone will raise a stink about it since you self-reverted. I wouldn't have noticed if you hadn't posted on your talk page about it. — Strongjam (talk) 19:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, editing the 8chan article does violate the agreement; you could have checked the talk page and seen the Gamergate warning notice. I know you're trying to do the right thing so I won't make a big deal of it this time, but please back off. --TS 03:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. --DSA510 Pls No RE 03:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Any further disruptive or uncivil comments will result in sanctions being placed on you in accordance with the arbitration policy, which may include a ban from the case pages or a block from editing Wikipedia. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fiiiiiine. But my point about this should be noted when talking about off site things. --DSA510 Pls No AndN 01:05, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure, DSA, that the phrase I used was "like the plague". Not like a common cold, not like the flu, not even like bird flu, like the plague. I won't protest you discussing things on he PD that directly concern you, but everything else ... like. The. Plague. I see you've been making some nice uncontroversial edits to articles. May I suggest you keep that up instead of making me wonder if I made a mistake by unblocking you every time you cross my watchlist? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In this event, the plague came to me in form of a notification. I was going to make a hueg rant about something, but I'll keep it short. I previously mentioned I want no part in the song and dance of arbcom. I wanted to clarify about the topic ban. The question about my signature was made in full seriousness, but I wrapped it up in a joke. As for the h8chan bit, while I was still on the page, I thought I'd point out the whole deal about "the hacker known as 8chan" is silly. Anyways, I have a short attention span. I don't care anymore, so long as I don't keep getting notifications about this. Now go away I'm plotting my takeover of Wikipedia with my armies of sockpuppets. --DSA510 Pls No AndN 19:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. On your signature, there are three questions you should ask yourself: is it intended to be offensive, could it reasonably be perceived as being offensive, and do the benefit of a quiet life outweigh your desire to keep it how it is? Up to you, my friend. Personally, I like a quiet life, but I think I must have signed a contract when I became an admin that said I couldn't have one. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be of the programming type and seen your name a few times in various places. What do you think of Toy program? It seems to be at best a loose unsourced definition that is not backed up by any independent research. It seems they want to apply it as a definition of 'toy program' when the program is just merely a toy. It doesn't require a new definition and I heard the term once before I've never found it to be in any way an actual definable item of it's own. I was debating tossing it to the curb, think that would pass in general or have you actually seen people use this language before? I've heard the words put together but not as a single definable concept, merely 'program that is a toy', not it's own thing in and of itself. FlossumPossum (talk) 04:07, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FlossumPossum: it seems to be, the concept falls between a Proof of Concept, and a demo program. Like, something more complex than your standard, state issued glxgears, but not a full blown game, like Cube. I think the concept presented by the article is sound, but I'm sure there's a different term for it. --DSA510 Pls No AndN 16:28, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yah, I've heard someone mention it before but it was never as a concept on it's own. I've only seen it referred to a as program that was a toy not a thing on it's own. It also definitely isn't proof of concept or demo program or anything between as written. It more says it's a single purpose program, while the term practice program exists and is slightly more documented. The way it's written doesn't seem to describe it in my opinion as a topic all of it's own. If someone can find any sort of reference to it anywhere, perhaps it'd belong in another programming related article at best?FlossumPossum (talk) 18:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Enlighten me -- what is "AndN"? Reply privately if you'd prefer. Thank you. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 01:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If I talk about it, I'd be violating my topic ban. Plus I have to update it anyways since the joke is over. --DSA510 Pls No AndN 01:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, really sorry, I swear I hadn't realized you were under a topic ban. Way to stick my foot in my mouth. A thousand apologies. I got my answer elsewhere anyways, I only thought to ask you because of your signature. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 01:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Its fine, anyways I c --DSA510 Pls No AndN 01:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's time to vandalize all your Dungeon seige articles baby. Strangely actually tried to update in the name of the king 3 but the thing was so awful there litereally is almost no info anywhere. Not even reviews of it rofl. Thanks for sticking up for me btw. FlossumPossum (talk) 05:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That edit summery (minus lenny) was the same summery he used when removing my comments kek --RetΔrtist (разговор) 06:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a notice that I made an enforcement request against you concerning your latest edits. See here. PeterTheFourth (talk) 14:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To enforce an arbitration decision and for violation of your ArbCom-imposed gamergate topic ban and failure to heed my advice to avoid the area like the plague, you have been blocked from editing for a period of one month. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted a procedure instructing administrators as follows: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Meh, I'll just make a sock to edit muh KDE articles lololololol. See you in 1 month <3 --DSA510 Pls No Level Up 03:49, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DungeonSiegeAddict510. Thank you. PeterTheFourth (talk) 21:57, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Missing Semicolon here, I was the one accused of being your sock puppet. Might as well introduce myself, I guess. A Missing Semicolon (talk) 22:15, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pfft. I never use spaces in usernames. Besides, I'd name a sockpuppet something stupid, like epikmastertrole2k15. Ya took it. YA TOOK IT MAN YA TOOK IT ALL. --DSA510 Pls No Level Up 04:45, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Besides im too lazy to make a sock. I'd just edit logged out. And would I really go STRAIGHT back to le gee gee stuff JUST after getting blocked? I am wounded ;-;. Its so that people won't ask me to do things, since I'm a lazy, lazy person. --DSA510 Pls No Level Up 04:50, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I'm here, I should also point out the other reason I wouldn't make a sock. Shortly after saying that comment, I realized that whatever poor sap happened to register to edit KDE articles would be attacked by GamerGhazi type persons. My deepest sympathies, @A Missing Semicolon:. --DSA510 Pls No Level Up 18:02, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, everything is fine. While the incident did worsen my view of Wikipedia a fair bit, it's only to be expected if Gamergate really is this controversial as a subject. Hopefully questioning objectivity of articles concerning controversial events will be less negatively received in the future. A Missing Semicolon (talk) 18:09, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just be careful mang. I got doxed for not toeing the party line hard enough. --DSA510 Pls No Level Up 18:25, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. A Missing Semicolon (talk) 19:27, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@A Missing Semicolon: if you are wondering why people were so quick to believe DungeonSiegeAddict510 was engaging in sock puppetry was because of this post. I am sorry that DungeonSiegeAddict510's comment resulted in you being suspect. I hope he/she is more careful about such comments in the future and comes to understand that such comments will cast suspicion on more than himself/herself. Chillum 19:14, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

.

I'd like to invite you to join the WikiProject R&B and Soul Music. We are currently on demand for new members, the project was dying, but with your help we can revive it and make it one of the best WikiProjects. Make me sure that you'll think about this and remember cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards Dfrr (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]