user talk:theleekycauldron

abcdefgh
8
a8 black rook
b8 black knight
c8 black bishop
d8 black queen
e8 black king
f8 black bishop
g8 black knight
h8 black rook
a7 black pawn
b7 black pawn
c7 black pawn
e7 black pawn
f7 black pawn
g7 black pawn
h7 black pawn
e4 black pawn
f3 white knight
a2 white pawn
b2 white pawn
c2 white pawn
d2 white pawn
f2 white pawn
g2 white pawn
h2 white pawn
a1 white rook
b1 white knight
c1 white bishop
d1 white queen
e1 white king
f1 white bishop
h1 white rook
8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
White to move, so it's leeky's turn – check back later! (last mover: CopperyMarrow15)



Inbox

[edit]

Sometimes messages slip through the cracks. Sorry about that! I keep this list to let me know what I still need to respond to – feel free to add your own name and message here if you're still looking for a response from me.

  1. 05:04, 17 February 2025 (UTC) fill out your thing at WP:REFLECTIONS – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)
  2. 02:17, 15 May 2025 (UTC) Make a chess move – HouseBlaster (talk • he/they)
  3. 02:51, 15 May 2025 (UTC) ban houseblaster from my talk page for messing with the inbox format theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 02:52, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

PSHAW doesn't seem to work on a nom

[edit]

Hiya! The PSHAW tool doesn't seem to work for promotion on this nomination. The error in the console I get is that the hook dependency on line 15 "Uncaught (in promise) TypeError: string is undefined" – so I was wondering if you know what on the page could be causing this DimensionalFusion (talk · she/her) 19:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, DimensionalFusion! Launchballer got it – PSHAW isn't set up to recognize hooks that are malformed as [[Article|'''Article''']]. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:51, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, amazing. Thanks so much for the quick response! DimensionalFusion (talk · she/her) 19:53, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No problem – hey, it's great to see you back! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 19:56, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IP block exemption renewal request

[edit]

Hi, I'm contacting you as you have checkuser permissions so might be able to help me. I've previously been granted IP block exemption (WP:IPBE) as I channel all my internet traffic through a commercial VPN whose ranges are IP-blocked, and it's a hassle to turn it off every time I want to contribute to Wikipedia. This has previously been granted per WP:IPECPROXY, but only for a year, and has now expired.

Would you be willing to re-add the `IP block exempt` right for me? I emailed the checkuser group on 14 June but haven't heard anything back yet. Thanks, Ligaturama (talk) 08:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June thanks

[edit]
story · music · places

Thank you for improving article quality in June! - I heard this music, yesterday, - streamed a day before at a different location. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RFA 2024

[edit]

Pinging you because you were the editor who was managing the process, including sending mass-messages to my user talk. I just checked in on the status at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review and see that it still says the Phase III/Administrator elections discussion is still open even though it closed 9 April 2025. As it's been more than five months since the last election, I was curious to see whether the next one had been scheduled, and, looking at WP:Administrator elections, I see that it's happening in just 16 days! It would be nice to see the 2024 review finally closed before the second election starts. wbm1058 (talk) 20:36, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then. I guess the burden falls on me to wield my mop, and clean it up. – wbm1058 (talk) 15:06, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, wbm, the last few days have been quite weird and this slipped off my radar. Thank you for handling it :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 15:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]