User talk:GustavoCza

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

(transposed from talkspace for the list)

Hey, I just noticed I filed a duplicate RFP on the same list after you'd already filed yours - should I remove mine from the page? Yasslaywikia (talk) 23:45, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just merge them (put your reasoning in my request). GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 22:47, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks Yasslaywikia (talk) 22:50, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. livelikemusic (TALK!) 02:28, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mind being a little more specific? GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 02:32, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit (which by the way, was not really a copy-edit issue to begin with), you violated MOS:DATEFORMAT. livelikemusic (TALK!) 03:59, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From what I'm seeing you just added a comma. Is that all? GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 04:03, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Per MOS:DATEFORMAT it is required, and was there prior to your unnecessary edit, therefore, editing against Wikipedia's manual of style. livelikemusic (TALK!) 14:22, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If the problem is related to the manual of style then why did you told me to cite a source? GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 14:28, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Considering your block history, I would be very careful with your behaviour moving forward. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:31, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Considering your history shows two more blocks than me, I advise you the same. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 21:39, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The comparing of blocks does not excuse the continued behaviours you are exhbiting on Wikipedia. Per WP:BRD, if you are reverted, instead of continuing to revert, you take it to the article's talk page and discuss things out. You don't just keep reverting. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:47, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the Talk page. It is conventional to respond there and not wrote a long edit summary. Regards Billsmith60 (talk) 22:32, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I only saw your discussion after my edit. Sorry. GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 04:17, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries at all. I've replied there. Cheers Billsmith60 (talk) 12:02, 16 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Many thanks for taking the trouble to email me that video: there was no need, honestly :) As it happens, I forgot to check it in time and the link has expired... but never mind, for I don't need to see it. This process shows you the unreliability of GT. All the best and happy editing! Billsmith60 (talk) 12:57, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]