User talk:Hafwyn

A very cool article about how dogs are related and it's not always what we think, based on research done by the geneticist who started the Canine Genome Project: Genetics and the Shape of Dogs; Studying the new sequence of the canine genome shows how tiny genetic changes can create enormous variation within a single species in 'The American Scientist', http://www.americanscientist.org. With a chart.

A current research project involving packs of semi-feral dogs running around in a park in Italy. Can't find much in English about it. http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuscany_Dog_Project on German Wikipedia. It would be interesting to know what they are finding out about dog behaviour when the dogs aren't referencing humans... but does it matter?

Hi Hafwyn, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Did you mean to create this in article space? --Bfigura ^(talk) 22:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I asked as it would appear that the page is meant to organize the translation project. (As opposed to being the translated content). If it's the former, then I think you want to move it to Wikipedia:Tuscany Dog Project. Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 23:02, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dog type, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford 18:56, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Championship (dog), and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Champion (dog). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:41, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Majority of pedigrees healthy' Interesting.

I was tagging it because it seemed unlikely, but yes, I was interested. Thanks for taking the time to tell me that--it is one of the most interesting things I've learned for a while! Movingboxes (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hafwyn, you may want to be aware that the dog projects appear to now be getting dragged into a much larger, um, "situation." See [1], [2], and then [3] (last 2-3 paras in particular). Longstanding problems here, latest round. Not asking you to do anything in particular, just want you to be aware of the bigger picture. Oh and also may want to note [4] and [5] Yes, I guess I AM begging for sympathy. Feel free to reply on this talk page, I think mine is watchlisted by said party. Or just dive for cover, may be the wiser course of action. LOL! Montanabw^(talk) 03:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken this to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Montanabw. --Una Smith (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for your reply. The dog in question was a stray, I am yet to take him to the pound but was hopefull for help here. Hopefully the pound could find the breed and the owner for me. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 00:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then all of history sections in all of dog breed articles should be renamed Disputed history, except from the part from when standardization started?

Those modern dog breeds of today have been created from the remnants of the breeds which survived the dark ages (Medieval times). I do not see your point in puting aside all of writings, paintings, literature, etc. and talking only about how Boxers have a history (all known, the founder's name etc.) and in such cases as Maltese we should write only about attempts of standardization and recognition of breeds in kennel clubs and FCI.

Do you know how the breeds of today are being awarded to countries of origin. On the basis of historical evidence, the more the better, paintings, pottery, literature, chronicles, ...

Imbris (talk) 23:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The more the better, but a hodgepodge helps no one. The article has to be kept consistent and must be structured according to its own needs; in this case I think 'Disputed history' or some such section would be most favourable, especially if you intend to make further edits of similar character. the roof of this court is too high to be yours (talk) 03:34, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you worry, the article will be consistent around Central Mediterranean Area and around reliable sources that list previous sources. Other sources that could be reliable but do not reference previous sources (authors, books, paintings, etc.) could go only in the disputed section of the history subtitle. -- Imbris (talk) 17:42, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Russian dog breeds (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Dog breeds originating in Russia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Russavia ^Dialogue 04:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an administrator, though I know you can request pages be semi-protected (no anon edits). In accordance with Assuming Good Faith, they aren't really "vandals", just "misguided". --Kingoomieiii ♣ Talk 01:13, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you put a redirect from the Verelade dog to the Gascon Saintongeois. As far as I can see, the Verelade dog is not the same dog at all. The American Rare Breed Association recognizes the Verelade^[1] as its own breed. You'll also notice if you search Verelade on various sites (such as puppyfinder.com) that it can be found as that in itself and not as the Gascon. Among other rare breed associations who will list "verelade". So, I'm taking/requesting for the redirect off for now.

Also, the Gascon Saintongeois is correctly named Grand Gascon-Saintongeois. I can't find any reference or kennels that accept the name just as Gascon Saintongeois vs. Grand Gascon-Saintongeois so I'll be requesting a move for this.

Is the proper name. UKC, FCI, CKC, and pretty much all groups/kennels that recognize the breed call it by this name. The "-" between Gascon and Saintongeois can be argued, however. ^{[2][3][4][5][6][7][8]}--Avalik (talk) 10:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hafwyn! I appreciate your enthusiam for creating new pages for dog breeds -- I'm certainly too lazy to do it -- but I will encourage you to do a little more research when deciding that one breed = a alternative name for another breed and creating a redirect instead of a page. Deleting redirects is a lot more work than creating them, and it also gives the breed less chance of ever getting a page if it goes unnoticed long enough. I notice you seem to redirect many breeds to other breeds with a similar name or a similar slang name -- as mentioned, I would encourage a little more research than this. Anyways, here are some of the pages that I'll be requested being deleted as redirect or changed:

• American Leopard Hound
• Leopard Cur (this one will instead be redirected to American Leopard Hound, is my hopes)
• Black Forest Hound
• Borador (possibly, it's a somewhat well known hybrid, might deserve it's own page)

and perhaps a few others. I won't request the redirect just yet, please reply on my talk page if you have an issue or if you would prefer to edit the redirect pages to pages themself instead. Avalik (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You should take another look at Domestic and wild animal crosses -- you need more references so as to not violate Wikipedia's No Original Research policy. :) Banaticus (talk) 23:10, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hafwyn. I came upon this article today and noticed your March merge proposal. It doesn't look like there is any opposition to the merge, so it should be a simple one. Best regards, momoricks 03:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Hafwyn, All breeds are a mixture of different breeds. AKC considers a breed a purebred that is a combination of 3 or more breeds and breeds true for 20 years. The Biewer Terrier has been proven genetically to be a distinct breed of its own through a 2 year research project between the BTCA, Inc. and Mars Veterinary. http://www.wisdompanelpro.com/breedinfo/breedsdetected.html

The BTCA, Inc. is the only club that has the support and membership of Mrs. Gertrud Biewer. Mrs. Biewer is in constant contact with Ilona Shanklin and Gayle Pruett, board members of the BTCA, Inc.. Ilona is from Germany and is the foreign correspondent for the BTCA, Inc. Mrs. Biewer considers the BTCA, Inc. to be the authority and protector of the Biewer breed.

The only accepted revised standard for the Biewer breed is the Biewer Terrier standard signed by Mrs. Gertrud Biewer and used by the only two show venues, ARBA (American Rare Breed Association) and the IABCA (Internation All Breed Canine Association), that allow rare breeds not yet accepted by AKC to show. http://www.biewer-btca.com/breedstandard.html The original standard was signed both Werner Biewer and Gertrud Biewer in Nov. 1989.

The IABCA in governed by the UCI e.V. in Germany, which has also accepted the BTCA, Inc. as the parent club for the breed. http://www.uci-ev.de/english_site/news.htm

Dog Channel is affiliated with Dog Fancy and Dog World magazines, which are purebred dog magazines and are able to list the purebred Biewer Terrier because we were accepted by ARBA as the parent club for the breed. http://www.dogchannel.com/dog-breeds/dog-breed-profiles/biewer-terrier-dogs-dog-breed.aspx

The BTCA, Inc. would like to add the standard and the information about the gentic study to the Biewer Terrier page.

Thank You Zarina1 (talk) 02:38, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Southwest Michigan Land Conservancy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 18:22, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's been proposed that two articles that you created on the same day, Dog type and List of dog types, be merged. I see that you haven't edited in over a year, but hoping that you might have email notifications turned on, and would like to respond to the proposal at Talk:Dog type. Thanks, Wbm1058 (talk) 13:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox dog crossbreed has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox dog breed. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:36, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hafwyn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on American Leopard Hound requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.ukcdogs.com/Web.nsf/Breeds/Scenthound/AmericanLeopardHound0101201. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stikkyy (talk) 05:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hafwyn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Breed type (dog) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breed type (dog) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cavalryman (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Purebred dog—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Cavalryman (talk) 22:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]