User talk:I call the big one bitey

Hello, I call the big one bitey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! France3470 (talk) 00:20, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Publisher Demos.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nouniquenames (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy. Thanks for trying to improve the Zack de la Rocha article. However, I reverted your change because it doesn't meet a couple of core Wikipedia standards (that aren't always successfully enforced, but we try). First, our biography of living people standard requires us to have excellent quality sources for contentious or negative statements about all living people mentioned in an article; Beto is living so the policy applies to statements about him in his son's article. Second, our reliable source guideline says: "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." The cited FAQ has no particular reputation for reliability; it's an anonymous web publication that might be right, but might isn't good enough for such a negative statement like that. And finally, though I didn't fully read the FAQ, the part I did read didn't have anything about Beto being taken away by the police, so it didn't seem to fully support the added material even if it was a reliable source. If you can find better sourcing for the statement, please feel free to re-add it with the new source. I know this may seem to be hyper-fussy, but we try not to hurt people through sloppy editing or repeating Internet rumors. Studerby (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:13, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rammstein. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Richard BB 11:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to God Hates Us All, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. 187.13.138.63 (talk) 01:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Adidas188x110.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flannel Shirt.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 24.2.249.30 (talk) 01:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Tallest Man on Earth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my name is 71.142.233.100 (talk). Great job on improving the "Nu metal" article! You had added lots of references to the article and cleaned up certain issues on your own. How did you do that? Wanna nominate it as a Good Article (see this link and that link for details)? 71.142.233.100 (talk) 00:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC) thanks, but i still think the article could use a little more work before considering nominating it as a good article[reply]

Great job on your second post... that'll be better recieved. Keep up the great work !

"....We are all Kosh...."  <-Babylon-5-> 19:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:My Animal Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of alternative metal artists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Desert rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:58, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frogs (song).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:10years1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bleed-the-Freak Vinyl.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Angry Chair (Alternative Cove)r1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tripod-Purple-Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tripod-Grey-Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tripod-Yellow+Cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am ready to support it.Please include your opinion. Bloomgloom talk 15:45, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Angry Chair (Alternative Cove)r1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tripod-Grey-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:03, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tripod-Purple-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tripod-Yellow+Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you removed entries such as Tad (band). I myself did not look at every entry I removed to make sure that their wikiarticle did not have a reliable source to categorize them as alternative metal either, but Tad (band) does have a reliable source on Tad (band) to properly categorize it as alternative metal. Would you be so kind as to check over my edits and yours to make sure we only remove the entries that are legitimately unreliably unsourced on their wikiarticle as well?Curb Chain (talk) 07:20, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,why don't you reply or interact man? Bloomgloom talk 07:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of alternative metal artists, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Heavy metal and Tad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep up the good work. Bloomgloom talk 15:56, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, buddy as the 'tripod' album contains freaking heavy & eerie songs like Grind, Sludge Factory, Head Creeps & many fans consider it a sludge metal album as well so, if you could find sources that label the self-titled album as sludge metal it will be of much help.I've seen a Sputnikmusic review described the album as Alice in Chains played aggressive ramped up doom metal on occasions.Therefore, I'd request you to look for sources. Bloomgloom talk 12:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

well this source calls the album sludge metal http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=ADHB&p_theme=adhb&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0ED0271EF493F7F0&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM but you have to pay money to read the full article, and this source calls the album sludgy http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,299586,00.html those are the only i could find I call the big one bitey

Is there any chance finding that article in Daily Herald web version, have you searched?Because, I couldn't find anything by entering keywords in google. Bloomgloom talk 12:13, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

nope, but i think the source that calls the album sludgy is enough to warrant adding sludge metal to the album's genre field I call the big one bitey

This spanish IP removed AiC from sludge metal, keep an eye on him. Bloomgloom talk 13:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bro, place your thoughts here. Bloomgloom talk 11:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep an eye on this guy, he's vulnerable to the article.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of alternative metal artists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambient (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, buddy keep doing those good works & insist on to the removal of heavy metal on Nickelcrap. Appreciation. Peace. I hope we'll work together again if I return after the topic ban, till then adios. Bloomgloom talk 07:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Thrash Funk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 10:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All I Was, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tremonti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, about the edit you just made on Daron Malakian, I reverted the whole thing mostly because of the popular thing, which you would admit is not neutral enough for an encyclopedia. But I also reverted the fact that you changed the band's genre. I don't want to be nitpicking, because honestly defining SOAD as either rock, hard rock or alternative metal is pretty much the same, and after all the band is introduced as rock on their page. The fact that SOAD was labelled as hard rock on Daron's page wasn't wrong, it didn't need to be changed. I'm not going to change it back again because it's not that important, I just wanted to point the fact that such changes are unnecessary. Maimai009 16:14, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alternative metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Undertow (album)

Incubus (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to If Not Now, When?

List of alternative metal artists (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Flyleaf

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Diabolus in Musica Tour Sampler.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Dark metal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. – Richard BB 12:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. Instead of reverting your edit, I want to state why I took away the information. The individual is an infamous POV-pusher whose main account of Metalvayne (talk · contribs) has been banned from editing and now has to resort to sockpuppeting. For the bit that I took away, I have read the two sources, and concerning the areas of text concerning sludge metal, they both say something to the effect that the Dirt album influenced what later became sludge metal; source 20 uses the term "sludge rock" instead of sludge metal, with quotes as well; that is also the general statement made on the Wikipedia page as well with these sources. Although I would appreciate it if the edits of Ravenlord5150 (talk · contribs) (an account which, upon the sockpuppet investigation has now been indefinitely blocked) be reverted due to the POV-pushing aspect about them, if the edits are indeed determined to be worth keeping then I won't protest and will drop the issue. Backtable ^{Speak to me}_{concerning my deeds.} 21:18, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eponymous To Anonymous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to America

The Gentle Art of Making Enemies (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Andy Wallace

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

We've been confused with an issue regarding the origins of alternative rock with another user and currently we are not able to reach a proper concensus. Our debate continues on our talk pages [1] [2] and unfortunately we're yet to carry on this debate on the talk page of alternative rock. Please feel free to join us to reach to a consensus. I thought that you could help us on this topic, as I rely on your knowledge and skills due to your awesome cooloborative work on alternative metal and other related articles

Thank you, Myxomatosis75 (talk) 00:56, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
I couldn't really understand what you meant by "consistency" in this edit. I'd be pleased if you'd further explain your rationale for removing the genre section from Oldfellows. Thank you. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 21:51, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well you should really be asking user Grapple X, because he's the one who came up with the idea of removing genres on Tomahawk albums to avoid genre warring and get Tomahawk articles up to good article status.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of alternative metal artists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voivod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm gonna be improving the singles articles I invite you to work with me.

Ihy34 (talk) 03:17, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try.

Well, from what I know, one of the strings are tuned differently, like a semitone (down). A guitar riff are several notes, so they are not the same. At least when played with the swipe of a hand. I suggest putting back User:Mr. Brain's addition.Curb Chain (talk) 09:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't even sourced to begin with, so i had every right to remove it.

Can you fix the infobox, I can't seem to fit it

Ihy34 (talk) 02:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited L.D. 50 (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Progressive music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	I award you this award, as you hold our articles to the highest standard! Curb Chain (talk) 02:16, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shuvel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shuvel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Richard BB 09:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alternative metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Stanier

Shuvel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wichita

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I call the big one bitey, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Playlist: The Very Best of Mudvayne, appears to be directly copied from http://www.allmusic.com/album/playlist-the-very-best-of-mudvayne-mw0002205838. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Playlist: The Very Best of Mudvayne if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 19:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mudvayneposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:37, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vampires Everywhere!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page As I Lay Dying (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't really been on the deathcore page much before, but I noticed you consider some of the deathcore sources unreliable. MetalSucks is reliable, and as been used as a source for many articles. Please see MetalSucks.

I know it looks like a blog but its more of a news site

Stgw (talk) 21:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The regular reader will not understand the difference between a music journalist and a genre. Such a lead is irrelevant.Curb Chain (talk) 13:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for genre-warring, as you correctly summarized your reversions at Escape the Fate. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Toddst1 (talk) 20:13, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Curb Chain. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Curb Chain (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mudvayne.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help out please? I've filed an SPI, but am unfamiliar with this sockmaster. Luke<fon color="FireBrick">no94 (tell Luke off here) 19:52, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry at what I did. I think the song is Post-grunge and not grunge. I will find a link to it. The song is really Post-grunge not Grunge. The link that is there seem fake. Nickelback are a Post-grunge band not a GRUNGE band. Even though their first album Curb was grunge. I have to find a link saying that Leader Of Men is post-grunge. If you want to change it and get another more true link you could. I am not going to change anything except if I find a good link. Sorry.

Have you read the source that says its grunge? It says early Nickelback like leader of men typifies grunge, and it's an extremely reliable academic source. I call the big one bitey (talk) 21:45, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is early Nickelback but its not original grunge. Leader Of Men is post-grunge not grunge. Nickelback Curb album is grunge but Leader Of Men is coming from a post-grunge album. When it says that leader of men typifies grunge it means it a more radio friendlier grunge which is Post-grunge. The name post means after grunge. I could find links about the song being a post-grunge song. But yeah thanks for the information that you gave. But when they say that Nickelback has this grunge sound it means they were influenced by it and this term is called Post-grunge.

You reverted an edit I made to this article with no edit summary, and without responding to the explanatory comment I left on the talk page. Please respond to that if you feel necessary, but do no edit against long-standing consensus. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[3]

could you explain what you mean by your edit summary about the hidden note?

[4]

Why isn't progarchives.com a reliable source? It elicits advertising.Curb Chain (talk) 07:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your response on the talk page about progarchives.com.Curb Chain (talk) 07:40, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:L.D. 50 (album)/GA1 review. — Robin (talk) 07:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I'd appreciate a response. — Robin (talk) 15:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits on 30 Seconds to Mars (album). The source you used does not seem to be reliable (read WP:V). Many critics used those genres when speaking about the second album, not the first one. I think that the writer of that article mixed it up. If you find reliable sources that support those genres, you can re-add them. Regards.--Earthh (talk) 18:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not try to accuse me. As I said before, the source does not seem to be reliable per WP:V. However, if it says the truth, it will be not difficult to find other sources that support your stuff.--Earthh (talk) 19:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Publisher Demos, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frogs (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I noticed that you've been editing the genre in the Anthrax albums. Unfortunately, when you're describing the genre, you need to use reviews which describe that particular album, not some about Lazarus A.D. That's all I wanted to share with you. Cheers.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Deftonesbored.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:7wordsI.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:7wordsII.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I call the big one bitey. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Publisher Demos.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Publisher Demos}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 05:02, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I call the big one bitey. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Frogs (song).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Frogs (song)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mudvayne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:43, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CoalChamber.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:41, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but be fair it also mentions Hip-Hop and industrial dance in the review so are you saying that they should be added? Lukejordan02 (talk) 02:35, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It just says it has hints of hip hop and industrial dance in the drum patterns, which it probably does. I think Allmusic defines alternative metal differently from Wikipedia, here on Wikipedia it's defined as heavier, more experimental grunge/alternative rock music from the early 90s, while on Allmusic nu metal, groove metal and alternative metal are usually defined as the exact same thing. --I call the big one bitey (talk) 02:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With respect it doesn't and I personally think that reviewer is talking a load of bollocks, I have left a message on the albums talk page and I am giving it a week if no one objects I will then remove it. Can't say fairer than that. Lukejordan02 (talk) 02:56, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page discussion aside what is your own opinion on the matter? Lukejordan02 (talk) 03:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't mind that much if the genre was removed since it does seem sort of misplaced on a thrash metal album. Allmusic is probably the only source on the web that would consider the album alternative metal, the problem is that it's probably one of the only reliable sources on the web for this album. I'm about to invite MrMoustacheMM into the talk page discussion so we can get a third opinion on the matter. I call the big one bitey (talk) 03:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be engaged in an edit war on Mr. Bungle regarding the genre used in the particular article. Please discuss changes on the talk page before changing the genre again, and remember to provide adequate sourcing. Thank you. —Dark 11:22, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for interrupt, there's a huge objection on talk page for adding "pop" genre in the infobox. Allmusic reviewer says an alternative rock album, however, he added "comes off as pop". I think "pop" that means a style or a hook, not an actual proper genre. 183.171.175.28 (talk) 11:37, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Riot Act (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''''Riot Act''''' is the seventh [[studio album]] by American [Rock music|rock]] band [[Pearl Jam]], released on November 12, 2002 through [[Epic Records]]. Following a full-scale
• |rev1Score = {{rating|4|5}}<ref name="allmusic">{{cite web|title=allmusic ((( Riot Act > Review )))|url={{Allmusic|class=album|id=r611292|pure_url=yes}}|publisher=[[Allmusic]]|author=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:14, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find any better sources that refer to Nothingface as "nu-metal?" The first two are clearly written by music journalists that loathe anything hard rock or heavy metal, which means they probably don't know squat about the larger genre and just lump bands in with others (i.e. music journalists calling Staind, Trust Company, and Puddle of Mudd nu-metal when they were clearly just hard rock bands). Not to mention that their "reviews" are about 40 words long. I really doubt these qualify as reliable sources. And as for the MusicMight page, I hate to tell you this, but that site was made by user-contributions. They have disabled the abilities now, but users used to be able to edit and add any information on bands that they wanted to. They didn't even have to cite sources. I guess it was their way of creating a music website without having to to the research themselves. "Let's just make the fans fill the info in!" Hsxeric (talk) 00:15, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Or, don't respond. That's cool too. Hsxeric (talk) 13:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On all the Pearl Jam related articles you've edited. Thanks! Love the username too - need to find a monorail now. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 06:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited You Are (Pearl Jam song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Over the Top. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Motograter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:04, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. You may be interested in giving some input here, regarding what genres to list in the infobox at the Breaking Benjamin article. Kokoro20 (talk) 06:25, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. Consensus has now been established to list hard rock, post-grunge and alternative metal. Kokoro20 (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of the West Coast Eagles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eric Mackenzie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Coast Eagles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windy Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the West Coast Eagles page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Pharmaecopia sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alternative metal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthrax (band). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]