User talk:Issac I Navarro

Pie charts

It isn't necessary to add pie charts to stub articles about schools. The charts are decorative, and too big to fit in the article. Just add the numbers. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I have seen quite few being used on school related articles, that use the pie chart would it be acceptable to delete them? I was trying to find what Wikipedia's standards may be on the matter, however, I can't seem to find a clear standard could you refer me to a talk page or somewhere that outlines this policy? Regarding the use of pie charts in school-related articles; while pie charts are not explicitly prohibited or required by Wikipedia's standards, their inclusion must adhere to Wikipedia's general content guidelines: they should be relevant, neutral, and supported by verifiable sources. Thus, I was not sure where to look, Template:Pie chart but I could not find anything super clear in regards to school pages. Issac I Navarro (talk) 19:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at WP:IMGCONTENT and MOS:IMAGES. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Mayorkas has been accepted

Charlotte Mayorkas, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Grahaml35 (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Issac I Navarro! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pioneer Park (San Diego) has been accepted

Pioneer Park (San Diego), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jenna Daniels has been accepted

Jenna Daniels, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 17:47, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fernando Casaempere (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

By "showcased", do you mean "exhibited"? If so, then for each: A solo exhibition or a group exhibition? When? Where? Under what title? And, if possible, what did the reviews say? If "showcased" means something else, then what?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fernando Casaempere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hoary (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Fernando Casaempere has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Fernando Casaempere. Thanks! Hoary (talk) 00:31, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.gettyimages.com/photos/fernando-casasempere-installation-at-somerset-house - What is a good way to better know if an image is free-use, thus allowing it to be added to Wikipedia? Also, I hope I addressed the concerns regarding the issues. I am rather inexperienced in drafting articles for people of notability; however, I believe that Fernando Casaempere should pass it WP:ARTIST. @Hoary:

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pearl & the Oysters (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Can you add three-four more references? Those used here don't establish notability. Refs need to provide extensive coverage specifically about the band via independent, reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pearl & the Oysters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 02:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Issac I Navarro! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 02:39, 2 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stub tagging

Thing of note: Whenever you tag a stub, use the appropiate templates, not the categories. Otherwise, it would make it hard to tell whether an article is a stub or not. Whatever categories you manually added to articles, replace them with the appropiate templates as detailed in the category pages. Thanks in advance. Mox Eden (talk) 09:12, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cave Johnson Couts has been accepted

Cave Johnson Couts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 18:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Granada Hills Charter Page

Hello. Why did you revert my edit of restoring content removed without an adequate explanation on the Granada Hills Charter page without explaining why? I've restored the removed content. Please always provide an edit summary if you revert my edits, so that it's clear why you did it. Thank you. Janan2025 (talk) 21:44, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Janan2025

The reason I left was in the next edit I made, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Granada_Hills_Charter&diff=1285921265&oldid=1285920960&variant=en

in regards to that to why it was removed, the information was primarily sourced; as well, that information is trivia.

Furthermore, @User:Willondon reverted your edit here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Granada_Hills_Charter&diff=1285977252&oldid=1285965307&variant=en

Thus restored the prior edit on the Granada Hills Charter page. Hopefully, this helps clear up any questions.

Cheers Issac I Navarro (talk) 15:25, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining it. Janan2025 (talk) 15:59, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cave Johnson Couts

On 30 May 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cave Johnson Couts, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cave Johnson Couts was separately acquitted for shooting his foreman, firing on funeral mourners, and whipping a native laborer to death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cave Johnson Couts. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cave Johnson Couts), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pearl and the Oysters (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by NeoGaze were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft's subject may be notable, but not enough contex is provided. Please add more info supported by reliable and independent sources. Interviews and other kinds of promotional content do not serve to establish notability. And please do not put 16 inline citations next to each other, as it counts as reference bombing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pearl and the Oysters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NeoGaze (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gordon Brown Sr

Hello, Issac I Navarro. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gordon Brown Sr".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 06:24, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holli Hyche (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Astra Travasso was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holli Hyche and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Astra Travasso (talk) 18:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holli Hyche (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Astra Travasso was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holli Hyche and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Astra Travasso (talk) 18:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fernando Casaempere (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

See WP:CITATIONOVERKILL!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fernando Casaempere and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 17:31, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holli Hyche (July 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Holli Hyche and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 02:20, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pearl and the Oysters has been accepted

Pearl and the Oysters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GoldRomean (talk) 23:03, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jordan Howlett has been accepted

Jordan Howlett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 (My "blotter") 05:08, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]