User talk:Josephlalrinhlua786

Hey Joseph,

Check out http://www.boxoffice.com/China for Chinese box office updates every weekend posted on Monday mornings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.229.27.96 (talk) 05:01, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph, checkout Box Office Guru to get an updated international gross for Godzilla. Godzilla has grossed 312 million internationally as of Aug 10th and it will be more after Japan and Ukraine grosses are added from this past weekend. I know for a fact Godzilla earned close to 5 mil this past weekend in Japan.

http://www.boxofficeguru.com/intl.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by RTurner711 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Josephlalrinhlua786, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 04:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Don't Let Me Be the Last to Know may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• the chemistry between the singer and her fictional boyfriend, played by French model Brice Durand (this marks the third time Brice had appeared in Britney's videos the other two being [[From the

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:05, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Uncletomwood. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Uncletomwood (talk) 07:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Uncletomwood (talk) 16:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Miley Cyrus may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | net_worth = U.S. $150 million (estimate as of June, 2014 <ref name=NetWorth>{{cite web| title = Miley Cyrus Net Worth| url = http:/
• AllMusic. Rovi Corporation|accessdate=October 8, 2009|title=Hannah Montana: The Movie [Soundtrack] > Review|first=Heather|last=Phares}}</ref> achieved commercial success.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:View of Shillong at night.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:36, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Prism (Katy Perry album). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:47, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

www.celebritynetworth.com is not a reliable source LADY LOTUS • TALK 13:53, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to St. Edmund's College, Shillong has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Deor (talk) 01:33, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Edmund's College, Shillong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Uncletomwood (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DJ earworm in 2013.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:45, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DJ earworm in 2013.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:01, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DJ earworm in 2013.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of best-selling singles in the United States. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Katy Perry has been certified for 72 million, that does not mean sales. Recording Industry Association of America works on shipments, and these certifications include on-line streaming also. Unless we know the hard-scanned sales per Nielsen SoundScan, we cannot add it. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:01, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Forbes Celebrity 100. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BZTMPS ★ · (talk? contribs?) 18:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Transformers: Age of Extinction may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }}
• |title=Transformers 4 film to be titled Apocalypse or Last Stand? Domains privately registered [UPDATED |publisher=Fusible |date=September 1, 2013 |accessdate=September 14, 2013}}</ref> On

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:53, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Transformers: Age of Extinction may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

|title=Transformers 4 film to be titled Apocalypse or Last Stand? Domains privately registered [UPDATED |publisher=Fusible |date=September 1, 2013 |accessdate=September 14, 2013}}</ref> On ₹32 crore ($5.3 million) in its opening weekend which is the third highest for a Hollywood title (behind ''[[The Amazing Spider-Man 2]]'' ($6.92 million) and ''[[The Amazing Spider-Man (2012 film)| during it's fourth weekend with $91.2 million only behind ''Dawn of the Planet of the Apes'' ($97 million.<ref>{{cite web | url =http://m.hollywoodreporter.com/entry/view/id/393756 | title =

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:10, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transformers: Age of Extinction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shillong, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 2D and 3D. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Dawn of the Planet of the Apes. STATic message me! 01:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sweet Falls, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Telegraph and Madhubani. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 16:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Meghalaya page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to X-Men: Days of Future Past, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. STATic message me! 17:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mary Kom (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The film was released on September 5, 2014 in over 3,000 screens across India <ref>{{cite web | url = http://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/box-office/Mary-Kom-Box-
• publisher = ''[[The Times Of India]]'' | date = September 5, 2014 | accessdate = September 6, 2014]]''</ref> and earned {{INRConvert|8.5|c}} on it's opening day.<ref name=r1>{{cite web|title=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:12, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shake It Off (Taylor Swift song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] by the [[Recording Industry Association of America]] (RIAA) with sales of 1,783,000.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart-watch/chart-watch-iggy-gives-j-los-booty-a-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:48, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Transformers: Age of Extinction may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |title=Transformers 4 film to be titled Apocalypse or Last Stand? Domains privately registered [UPDATED |publisher=Fusible |date=September 1, 2013 |accessdate=September 14, 2013}}</ref> On
• | publisher = ''Variety'' | date = August 3, 2014 | accessdate = September 30, 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web | url = http://m.timesofindia.com/entertainment/english/hollywood/news/Transformers-Age-of-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:12, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Say Something (A Great Big World song) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at The Maze Runner (film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. STATic message me! 14:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page St. Edmund's College, Shillong has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at St. Edmund's College, Shillong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. You have already been asked to stop using false edit summaries, but are continuing to use them. You have removed citation needed tags from unsupported claims, without providing the required citations, and are repeatedly adding trivia, such as canteen opening hours contrary to WP:WPSCH/AG#WNTI - Arjayay (talk) 07:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw the comment on Citation tags, as these were incorrectly formatted (square brackets instead of curly) - my apologies - Arjayay (talk) 08:02, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Maze Runner (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you seem to be using edit summaries like "fix typo" or "fix grammar" for edits that are most definitely not fixing typos. (See this edit for instance.) Please make sure that your edit summaries actually describe what you're doing in the edit. ~Adjwilley (talk) 00:47, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I second what Adjwilley says above. There is no requirement to use edit summaries so you are free to leave them blank, but if you do use them they must not be misleading. Betty Logan (talk) 09:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adjwilley and Betty Logan, I wonder if there is a language barrier with Josephlalrinhlua786. And like I've pointed out to Betty Logan via email, I have my suspicion that Lucy White (talk · contribs) is Josephlalrinhlua786. Flyer22 (talk) 04:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting...there does seem to be some overlap, but I noticed that the prompt for edit summaries in mobile editing is "Example: fixed typo, added content" so a lot of mobile edits will probably look alike. I have blocked Josephlalrinhlua786 for 2 days because of the edit summary issue, which will hopefully get their attention. ~Adjwilley (talk) 05:20, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know that about the mobile phone editing. That explains why I often see new editors adding material with the edit summary "Added content." Flyer22 (talk) 05:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i am not fake i am new here and you so bad with me, i just help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucy White (talk • contribs) 01:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adjwilley and Betty Logan, judging by this, this and this, there is not much of a language barrier between us and Josephlalrinhlua786. He is capable of explaining himself well enough in edit summaries. Josephlalrinhlua786, it's obviously good that you've gotten better with edit summaries. Do try to use them more often, and make sure that your edits are accurate and are not WP:Synthesis. Also, regarding the first link I pointed to in this paragraph, be careful not to label WP:Good faith edits as WP:Vandalism. Even if an editor's edits are WP:Disruptive, those edits are not necessarily WP:Vandalism. By that, I mean if the editor truly means well and is not trying to harm Wikipedia. Flyer22 (talk) 22:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

~Adjwilley (talk) 05:10, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to WhatsApp may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 600 million users, followed by [[China]]'s [[WeChat]] (438 million users) and [[Japan]]'s [[LINE (application|LINE]] (400 million users).<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.forbes.com/sites/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:13, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please make sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! SummerPhD (talk) 13:08, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dracula Untold may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] ($2.4 million from 495 screens), [[France]] ($2.1 million from 303 screens), [[Australia]] (($1.9 million from 213 screens) and [[Malaysia]] ($1.3 million from 108 screens).<ref>{{cite web |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:32, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annabelle (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Annabelle (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Turner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:00, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Book of Life (2014 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fury (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is saying, "Nolan brought the film in on time and $10 million under its $175 million budget." This means $165 million was actually spent on the film, and I think we focus on reporting actual spending. Don't worry, I thought at a glance that $175 million was the upper limit of a range too! Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 14:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The word is "suppressed". Look it up if you don't believe me but please don't change it back again without checking first. WaggersTALK 16:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Never Have I Ever, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Pie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Josephlalrinhlua786, I see you were previously blocked for misleading edit summaries, yet you changed a whole lot of box office figures at Dracula Untold with an edit summary relating to grammar. Please provide an accurate edit summary, and don't change numbers without citing a good source. Yngvadottir (talk) 14:04, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Blank Space may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• effed up. Wait to see the Blank Space video. Let Taylor introduce it herself. It'll be worth it :)"<ref>{{cite web | url = https://mobile.twitter.com/JosephKahn/status/531810387063095296?p=v |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Blank Space, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Big Hero 6 (film) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Transformers: Age of Extinction page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1 page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:46, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ChamithN. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 15:21, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Exodus: Gods and Kings page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Exodus: Gods and Kings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Exodus: Gods and Kings page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

YouTube Rewind

added links pointing to Dark Horse (song), Bang Bang (song) and Anaconda (song)

Exodus: Gods and Kings

added a link pointing to Variety

Interstellar (film)

added a link pointing to Variety

The Fault in Our Stars (film)

added a link pointing to The Edge of Tomorrow

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies

added a link pointing to Variety

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay – Part 1

added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to add a source for that 574 figure to the body? I don't see that number anywhere in the article as it stands, and I can't look at any entertainment websites as I'm at work. If you can't, that's okay, I'll be able to do it in a few hours. Sock (tock talk) 15:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sock (tock talk) 15:59, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies box office performance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies box office performance until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

My Love, Don't Cross That River

added a link pointing to Gangwon Province

Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb

added a link pointing to Variety

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies

added a link pointing to Variety

The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies box office performance

added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't attack other users as you have done here. We assume good faith of fellow editors, even if we don't agree with their edits. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited It Follows, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the WhatsApp page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fifty Shades of Grey (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 1989 (Taylor Swift album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on 1989 (Taylor Swift album). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fifty Shades of Grey (film)

added a link pointing to Deep Impact

Frozen (2013 film)

added a link pointing to The Wolf of Wall Street

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited McFarland, USA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim White. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fifty Shades of Grey (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, on Dragon Blade I noticed that you updated the box office for the film with The Hollywood Reporter article, which is great. But I noticed that you also put "with 100,581 screenings and 2.1 million attendances" [1], which is from the article, but when you put it in a context like that, it is incorrect. I noticed that in many of these Hollywood Reporter articles, they mentions the screenings and attendances, but these figures are NOT referring to the cumulative screenings and attendances of the film, but it is referring to the 7 days period of box office tracking (you notice that these Hollywood Reporter articles on box office in China comes out every 7 days).

And surely if this film made over 100 million dollars it would've had more than 100,581 screenings and 2 million attendances in its entire run, wouldn't it? So when you update the box office for films in the future, it is probably best to note that these figures for screenings and attendances are not for the entire run of the film. Or perhaps skip them and just mention the box office gross. And thank you for updating the article.--Thomasettaei (talk) 11:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think similar information on screenings, attendances, etc. is on the From Vegas to Macau II and Boonie Bears: Mystical Winter articles. Can you perhaps fix them as well?--Thomasettaei (talk) 11:26, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 14:16, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond immediately at Talk:Frozen Fever. If you fail to comply immediately with Wikipedia content policies, particularly Wikipedia:Verifiability, you will be reported to the administrators and may be suspended or blocked. Thank you for your cooperation. --Coolcaesar (talk) 14:19, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Josephlalrinhlua786. You've seen me revert you at times while citing MOS:Paragraphs; the part I am referring to is where it states, "Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading." It is usually not good form to create a subheading for one-sentence material, material that is a couple of sentences or material that is otherwise significantly small. Just like the Critical reception section usually does not need to be broken up into Positive reviews and Negative reviews, the Box section usually, or at least often, does not need to be broken up into North America and Outside North America or North America and Other territories. The non-heading text can inform readers what content pertains to "outside North America," like the Cinderella (2015 film) article does. That is why I reverted you here, here and here at that article. If the box office content becomes hefty, like the box office content at the Fifty Shades of Grey (film) article currently is, then it is a good idea to split the content into subsections. Flyer22 (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I've reverted you again on this; stop WP:Edit warring on it. You don't discuss matters on the talk page, so I can hardly expect a discussion with you. Even so, I can seek some form of WP:Dispute resolution, such as going to WP:Film, to ensure that you follow Wikipedia's guidelines, including MOS:Paragraphs. Flyer22 (talk) 06:32, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taken to WP:Film, which you will already know if you have WP:Ping enabled. Flyer22 (talk) 02:52, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Despite the request by Flyer22 above you have continued turning single paragraphs into sections such as at Cinderella. If you believe you have valid reasons then please engage with the community and join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Unnecessary subheadings, which violate MOS:Paragraphs, in the Box office sections and explain to us why your approach is superior. It is important for you participate in the discussion if this issue is to be resolved. Betty Logan (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Monsters University page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Write your update in your sandbox and then replace the existing text. Do NOT just delete sections of text - SchroCat (talk) 13:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Broken Horses

added a link pointing to Tom Stern

Furious 7

added a link pointing to Georgia

Furious 7 (soundtrack)

added a link pointing to EDM

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Vijay Benedict, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from Christian Today, interview with Dibin Samuel, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Vijay Benedict and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Vijay Benedict, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Vijay Benedict. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Vijay Benedict with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Vijay Benedict saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! —Largo Plazo (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Transformers: Age of Extinction page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Furious 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alice in Wonderland (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Handwritten (Shawn Mendes album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MDNA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:IINFO. We are not a collection of statistic material. There is nothing notable about the two day earnings (that I can see) and we can easily just have the weekend number. Secondly, you yourself removed the info on the $3 million IMAX domestic record. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 17:00, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing out my flaws and I will work on that, but u see I'm just following what happened in the page The Avengers and Iron Man 3 and many other articles that has put the day 1 day 2 or even day 3 gross. So if u removed my "hardwork" box office edits in this page, why not remove those edits that includes those grosses from unecessary days? I mean if u don't that would be discrimination and bias right? If point your finger at one editor making a mistake and u clean that out and then there's dozens of other articles having the same mistake but u don't do nothing about u, I mean how it that even justified. I feel like you're the only one whose having problem with it. Look at the cast section, it's so long and stuffy and excessively detailed. And next time please instead of reverting someone else's hardwork, instead try editing or collecting news for the page like eg, the page lacks the news about the controversial Germany cinema boycott and the box office opening impact the Saturday Manny-Paman fight had. Why not add those info rather than minding ur business into someone else's work?. Try adding that Germany cinema boycott, I suggest you to.

This is a neutral notice of a discussion at Talk:Avengers: Age of Ultron#Subsection: RE: "visit" over using either the word "visit" or the phrase "go to" in a particular context. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this edit, as we've all presumably learned in grammar school, copying is bad. Please don't copy/paste content like this from sources again. You can include facts like dates and names and titles, but you cannot copy prose without marking it as a quotation, because prose is copyrighted. This is something Wikipedia takes very seriously and can easily result in a block. You've been warned before about copyright violations, I see. There was another problem too, that you indiscriminately included information about the pre-party, as if we're all invited and need to know when to show up. I've removed that as trivial. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:29, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Stand by Me Doraemon page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joseph, on at least two occasions I've noticed you changing the Jurassic World budget data to fit what I can only imagine is your preferred POV. Your original edit here was problematic because you seemed to be under the impression that facts are democratically selected. I opened a discussion on the article's talk page and pinged you, but you didn't participate. Resubmitting the same data as you did in this edit without any further discussion, and with an insufficient explanation "budget" tends to make you look sneaky, and that you are trying to cater facts to your point of view. Please don't do this, it's academically dishonest, as well as disruptive. If there are different perspectives about some data, and those perspectives come from various reliable sources, we should be presenting the range of data, not cherrypicking the data we like best. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:32, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Transformers: Age of Extinction page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Jurassic World, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:20, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tomorrowland (film) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just wonder why you and others think they are the most accurate site for box office numbers and in particular international numbers? RTurner711 (talk) 11:12, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't, which is why we said that. They are obviously the most accurate source for movie revenues (theatrically), but sometimes they are not always up to date. For example, a recent example can be given to The Maze Runner which they forgot to still include the revenue the film earned from it Japan release (around $4+ million according to Deadline.com. And regarding the "International total box office" section, it tends to really vary with other sites such as Deadline.com, The Hollywood Reporter and Variety, so it's hard to decide which one is more genuine in terms of total gross. But in terms of domestic gross and worldwide gross, they are the most dependable, they systematically and chronologically lists every record and grosses daily - weekly - monthy. What other site does a very intense scrutiny over movie box office performance other than BOM?

Hi,

Your edit from Fifty Shades Freed was miread [2]. It says she's not returning to direct the film. However, I do agree it's unsourced. Just to let you know (: Callmemirela (Talk) ♑ 12:17, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Avengers: Age of Ultron page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Avengers: Age of Ultron

added a link pointing to The Numbers

Fifty Shades of Grey (film)

added a link pointing to The Numbers

Furious 7

added a link pointing to The Numbers

Jurassic World

added a link pointing to The Numbers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That edit summary you left on Ant-Man (film) was highly inappropriate. We don't call people assholes here, or accuse others of being selfish, which is bad faith, as well as personal attacks. Please stop. Spaghetti07205 (talk) 00:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Ant-Man (film). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You're edit summary regarding recent box office information was unnecessary. I invite you to read up on WP:INDISCRIMINATE to see that every possible stat or info does not need to be mentioned. For example, top markets can generally be limited to three. Additionally, possibly explore Deadline.com's articles to see that their box office info is updated throughout the day/weekend on one url, so the same link used to add info in the morning, may be able to cover new info added later in the day (as was the case here). Favre1fan93 (talk) 00:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Southpaw (soundtrack) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Revenant (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Behind-the-scenes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you make edits like this one, keep in mind that it's important to quote sources exactly as they wrote something. Paraphrasing them while placing those words in quotation marks isn't acceptable. I've fixed your edit, but please be mindful of this in the future. Grandpallama (talk) 19:44, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that some edits performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. They are as follows:

• On the Ant-Man (film) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
• On the Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check these pages and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St. Edmund's College, Shillong, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Irish and Higher School Certificate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited What Do You Mean?, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages I Believe, Fantasia and Harlem Shake. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mission: Impossible – Rogue Nation page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Writing's on the Wall (Sam Smith song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Demo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you cannot copy and paste text directly from another source like you did [3] without properly attributing and placing the directly copied material in "quotes". That is a violation of copyright. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Martian (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Heaven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Martian (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inside Out (film). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

The Lego Movie

added a link pointing to James Gordon

The Martian (film)

added a link pointing to 4D

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please ensure that when you add dates to articles written in British English—such as Spectre or Kingsman—you do so in a format consistent with the rest of the article. You should note that the format "October 22, 2015" should not be used in articles in British English. – SchroCat (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you insult others, as you did here, I will happily file a report against you at the relevant forum. As per the original resin for reversion, see the thread above: do not use US formats in a British English article. I am bored of having to change your inappropriate formats. – SchroCat (talk) 14:06, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ya i know what i said and it was wrong, but can't you just simply correct the date format instead of reverting the whole thing? If u knew the fault u could've just corrected it. Simple!

Having corrected several of your poorly formatted additions and left a note here, the onus is on YOU to get it right. - SchroCat (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

well than, from now on i will try my utmost effort to not make mistakes again and u stop stalking me. You stick to what you're doing and i'll stick to what i'm doing. Let's not mind someone else's business ok? thank you

I've not stalked you at all, so please don't try and smear me with untruths. I have fixed your errors on two articles, both of which I have edited for some time. – SchroCat (talk) 14:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How many bloody times do you have to be reminded to use the right date format]. It's not bloody difficult, and I'll happily revert your additions if you can't be bothered to do it properly. – SchroCat (talk) 18:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

are you taking the piss, or do you have a problem? DO THE BLOODY PROPERLY. – SchroCat (talk) 03:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Josephlalrinhlua786 ,

The Wikipedia Asian Month will begin in less than an hours, and once again, thank you for signing up! Let's help the world know more about Asia! Below are a few reminders for you:

1. Please check out the rules here. Some rules have been adjusted—the most important being that on the English Wikipedia, stubs may be expanded with some limitations.
2. Do take the time to read the Q&A if you have any questions, or ask on the talk page.
3. The list of participants has been alphabetized so you can more easily find your name and report your contributions.
4. There is a template that you can use on your user page. {{Template:User Asian Month‎}}

Enjoy the Wikipedia Asian Month :) --AddisWang (talk)

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Martian (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spectre. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Danish Girl (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Danish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

In the Heart of the Sea (film)

added a link pointing to Tom Holland

Monster Hunt

added a link pointing to Weibo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for moving The Legend of Tarzan (film) to the correct location. Be aware that when you are creating or moving an article and the article begins with "The", "A" or "An" (or the equivalent in other languages) that you should introduction a sorting key above the categories. This allows the article to be sorted correctly when one visits the categories it is in. You can read more at WP:SORTKEY. BOVINEBOY2008 02:05, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks Daniel322111 (talk) 06:53, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Daniel322111. Josephlalrinhlua786, thanks for creating List of box office records set by Star Wars: The Force Awakens!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Maybe put a note in the films wiki page that links here

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Daniel322111 (talk) 06:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Point Break (2015 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Croft. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cinema of China may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• The country added about 8,035 screens in 2015 (at an average of 22 new screens per day, increasing its total by about 40% to around 31,627 screens,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been repeatedly warned (and blocked) for directly copying copyrighted text from other websites. You don't seem to be getting the message, as evidenced by this edit. Yes, you made minor changes to the text. That is not sufficient to avoid copyright concerns. You must not directly copy or closely paraphrase material from copyrighted sources. Do you understand what the problem is? - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Monster Hunt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deadline. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dinnypaul. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fifty Shades of Grey (film) have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dinnypaul (talk) 15:51, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This is not an American film and per the manual of style for films, we do not include the American release date (per - "Do not include information on the film's release in every territory"). Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:26, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erm, this was uncalled for. Please apologise for your personal attack. Thank you. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:27, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And this. Please read WP:CIVIL before you continue to edit. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, can you confirm that you've read and understood the policy I've linked to above about film release dates? Do you understand that you're all engaged in an edit war, which could lead to you being blocked (along with the personal attacks)? Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 14:34, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Hi Joseph. I think the problem with edits like this is an unfamiliarity with how Wikipedia works. Firstly, text you write is usually recoverable if somebody else removes it; if you go to the "History" tab on an article, you can click on an older revision that has your text in it. Don't just blindly restore the old version though, that overwrites other editors work and result in sanctions for edit-warring. I would strongly recommend starting a discussion on Talk:Deadpool (film) explaining why you want to make your changes. Calmly say what the issue is with the content and why you prefer your version. I hope that's of use - I don't like to see editors blocked, especially for relatively minor issues. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:12, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High School Musical (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Borden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Untitled fifth Transformers film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please do not create Untitled fifth Transformers film again and again. Wait until filming begins or you will be reported to an admin, thanks. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 10:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, man, I appreciate your efforts for Wikipedia. I was just warning you not reporting you yet. And I'm not heartless or stopping you from editing Wikipedia. I was also like you once, so don't worry and just keep editing. But please follow the rules and if you want to contribute this page, just try to contribute Draft:Transformers 5. When filming begins, an admin will move this draft to mainspace. And I'm not stopping or discouraging you from editing, just create articles only when filming has begun. Happy editing. --Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 12:00, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No idea why you added {{good article}} at the top of Jurassic World, but I have reverted that edit. Articles need to go through a nomination process before achieving "good article" status. I've noticed you've also had other controversial edits on that article, so if you need help editing on Wikipedia or understanding its policies, a good place to start is at the Welcome to Wikipedia page which contains useful links for editors who have questions or need editing assistance. --GoneIn60 (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Ben-Hur (2016 film) page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the Ben Hurr page is that it's written using WP:Proseline, or in other words, sentences seemingly are added without concern for the larger picute as a whole. I was not "vandalising" as you put it I was merely trying to make the page easier to read. For instance in the casting section you mention Tom Hiddleson, being considered, mention Morgan Freeman, and then mention that Hiddleson wasn't cast. You also do a similar thing for Olivia Cooke later on in the section. Whereas my edit mentions Hiddleson was considered, not cast and then list who was cast and then move on to the next part.

I'm not the greatest speller, I fully admit that, but I do think I know my way around a Wikipedia article. I think if we work together we can make a great article. --Deathawk (talk) 07:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuing to add numerous citations to Forbes Contributors articles to many Wikipedia articles even though it has been pointed out to you that those articles are not reliable sources because there is no pre-publication editorial process, which means Forbes Contributors sites are essentially glorified blogs hosted under the Forbes masthead. Please review WP:RS and WP:V. If you continue to add information cited to sources that clearly do not comply with Wikipedia policy, your edits may be treated as disruptive editing and reverted on sight. Thank you for your cooperation. --Coolcaesar (talk) 09:42, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Employees? Forbes Contributors are not employees. If you had bothered to spend five minutes actually reading up on how the Forbes Contributors program works, you would not have made that mistake. Do you understand the difference between an employee and an independent contractor? Do you understand the difference between a blogger who posts directly to the Web with no filter, versus a journalist who submits a story to an editor who has discretion as to hold or run the story? Have you actually ever been an employee, independent contractor, blogger, or journalist? (I am beginning to suspect the answer might be no to all of the above.)

Also, the fact that some other editors are also violating WP policy is no excuse. Either you will bring your edits into compliance or you don't. WP:V is non-negotiable. Every WP editor who has attempted to challenge that core policy either came to realize that discretion is the better part of valor, or otherwise, they realized one day they weren't a WP editor any more. --Coolcaesar (talk) 13:53, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You keep evading the core issues, which further confirms that you have no justifiable basis for your position. Your evasive tactics are so transparently obvious to any adult they're more sad than funny. (Only children and emotionally immature adults make excuses like that.) Answer the questions. Focus on the issues. Have you even read Wikipedia's core policies? Do you even know what they are? How old are you? 12?

Also, I just traced the edits of which you speak of. Two are yours. [4] [5] Two others are by