User talk:Leutha

Welcome!

1 May 2025
News and notes: India cut off from Wiki money; WMF annual plan and Wikimedia programs seek comment In the media: Feds aiming for WMF's nonprofit status Recent research: How readers use Wikipedia health content; Scholars generally happy with how their papers are cited on Wikipedia Arbitration report: Sysop Tinucherian removed and admonished by the ArbCom Discussion report: Latest news from Centralized discussions Traffic report: Of Wolf and Man Disinformation report: At WikiCredCon, Wikipedia editors and Internet Archive discuss threats to trust in media News from the WMF: Product & Tech Progress on the Annual Plan Humour: Crisis erupts as furious admins, functionaries complain about crappy t-shirts Comix: By territory In focus: Using AI on the Russian Wikipedia: opportunities or challenges? Community view: A deep dive into Wikimedia Debriefing: Barkeep49's RfB debriefing Gallery: Meet the winners of Wiki Loves Monuments 2024 Obituary: JarrahTree, JohnClarknew and Yashthepunisher
Single page Front page About Subscribe Suggestions Archives

• Archive 1
• Archive 2
• Archive 3
• Archive 4
• Archive 5
• Archive 6
• Archive 7
• Archive 8
• Archive 9
• Archive 10
• Archive 11
• Archive 12
• Archive 13

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Wikidata/FamilyTree, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect WWI Editathon and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#Mainspace redirects to meetups and editathons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 15:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox England and Wales electoral division has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 00:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-Bolshevik Communism and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#Anti-Bolshevik Communism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 01:46, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --15:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Geographic Society in Hamburg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability or even significance. No sources listed. None found on search. Sources on de.wiki page (which also doesn't make a claim to significance) are all primary, nothing that can be used to support a claim of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikidata / FamilyTree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:17, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

West Suffolk District is probably the most appropriate title for this per WP:UKDISTRICTS as its normal for the council to redirect to the district not the other way round. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see now you have created 2 articles which have roughly the same content, per Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about districts#Local authorities we should generally only have 1 article unless like Isles of Scilly or Plymouth the district its self is combined with another entity, are you OK with swapping West Suffolk District Council to West Suffolk District Council titles as the former has longer history and then just redirect "West Suffolk District Council" to "West Suffolk District"? Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. I shall be doing some more work today so that WSDC details the composition of the council as per a suitable Election apportionment diagram. I was thrown by the discovery that WSDC could not be simply moved to WSD as that already existed as a redirect page. This is in line with having a different article for Suffolk County Council and Suffolk

I got quite a bit done today.Leutha (talk) 13:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure we need a separate article for the district council since unlike county councils there isn't usually much to say about the council that doesn't directly apply to the district but I will request history moving since the council article since it was about the district until the split. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I think as the consequences of the Lyons Inquiry into Local government get operationalised through the locality budgets used in Suffolk, there will be plenty to say.Leutha (talk) 22:42, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of former Cobbold pubs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that these were notable as a group.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 14:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article John Stephen Benezet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sign that meets WP:GNG - apparently genealogical interest only. Not to be confused with a 19th-century JSB who left a diary.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ingratis (talk) 19:07, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for creating this article, There is also a draft at Draft:Thurleston for Thurleston. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Leutha (talk) 12:39, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just wanted to ask if you could perhaps clarify your changes made to Saidiya Hartman. I removed some of your content, because it was rather jumbled (see your edit here, mine here). I know this is from well over a year ago, but do you have any insights? Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 22:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PamD 07:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 dummelaksen  (talk • contribs) 12:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article 4th Army (Russian Empire) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Abrvagl (talk) 04:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cassius Cook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Nothing in depth in major databases. No worthwhile redirect targets.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 13:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Babruysk Station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ost (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have you thought about expanding Renée de Montmort by translating from the French wiki?--evrik ^(talk) 20:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Ships built on the Orwell indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:50, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:52, 1 June 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for completing Henham, Suffolk, an interesting one is Dallinghoo Wield (Draft:Dallinghoo Wield) which was apparently the smallest parish in England! Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:48, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if the People's Institute, Manchester still stands? The sources you provided when creating the stub seem to only be about its history, and checking the modern road on Google Maps to find the coordinates, I'm not seeing it. Lord Belbury (talk) 18:23, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

While as I noted there is probably little point in having West Suffolk District Council separate from West Suffolk District (per WP:UKDISTRICTS) when the district is combined with a settlement such as Harlow it probably makes sense to have a separate article for the district council namely Harlow District Council. There are 7 districts in England where the district is combined with the settlement but there is no separate article for the council namely Crawley Borough Council, Gosport Borough Council, Hastings Borough Council, City of Lincoln Council, Tamworth Borough Council, Woking Borough Council and Worcester City Council. These article would likely be useful to create unlike councils for districts that only exists as districts or where like Colchester the district is already split from the settlement. I have started a draft at Hastings Borough Council. Its possible for Worcester an article should be created on the district instead as its not all unparished. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:09, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, @Crouch, Swale. I will read your thoughts carefully. However in the meantime it has prompted me to update the Ipswich Borough Council page, which needs a new seat plan and adjustment following the Tory whip being removed from one of their councillors.Leutha (talk) 07:13, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The councillors and seat plan should probably be added to Hastings, I didn't add some of the data because I'm not that familiar with how the elections etc work. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:27, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

czar 17:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Secret of the Forest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article makes no claim that the work is significant in any way and provides no reliable sources to indicate notability, beyond a mention in a local history. This would be WP:A7 material, if A7 applied to films.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GoldenRing (talk) 10:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Leutha! It was great to meet you last week, and I hope that you enjoyed the session.

I just wanted to drop by and see if you had any questions after the event - do drop me a line if there's ever anything I can do to help.

The results of the evening's work can be seen here, and so far there have been over 19k pageviews of the articles we edited.

All the very best, and thanks again for taking part! Sara Thomas (WMUK) (talk) 17:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Season's Greetings
		Wishing everybody a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Adoration of the Magi by Luca Signorelli is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 18:34, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --14:14, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At Grade I listed buildings in Ipswich the only one without an image is 1025070. I was looking on Google Street View last night at it and wasn't sure if I was looking at the right building. Do you know if we have any images of it on Commons so that we can have a full house there. Also there are a few others at Grade I listed buildings in Suffolk like Otley Hall and Gifford's Hall with no images. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:53, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, @Crouch, Swale. I found photo for the building. I have been thinking about Isaac Lord and the building as to whether either is notable. Alfred Sizer, also associated with building, was a Mayor of Ipswich, but I am not sure of his notability. If the building proves notable, it maybe useful to mention Sizer and Lord in that article, without a Wikipedia page being needed. I'll see if I can upload some more pictures. I'll also see if I can find some historic images of other Grade I listed buildings in Suffolk, but that may take a while.Leutha (talk) 11:12, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given the Ipswich one doesn't even have a name I'd be less sure but the likes of Otley Hall will likely be notable. Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:14, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the problem with 1025070 is more that Historic England website did not put a name to the building. However the name I would be inclined to use is the Isaac Lord Complex] which appears in a research paper they put out. This mentions the oldest timber dating back to the first half of the fifteenth century. There are also a couple of paintings here by Willaim George Merrick (1857-1935) which are in the public domain and were painted in 1924. Nice pump from 1802! Leutha (talk) 16:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OK so it seems to be several buildings (as the listing suggests) I was thinking it was the house just after Briarbank if heading towards Woodbridge. Yes indeed it actually may merit an article then. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:17, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a look at Otley Hall, and agree it warrants an article, but also see Giffords Hall, Stoke-by-Nayland which does have an article and images.Leutha (talk) 10:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gifford's Hall in Wickhambrook, West Suffolk (1235864 at TL7708353842) not Giffords Hall in Stoke-by-Nayland, Babergh (1283138) at TM0180837432. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:01, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you are quite right, @Crouch, Swale. I had a chance to visit the library today and did a bit more for Otley and started the Wickhambrook Giiford's Hall.Leutha (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, its a bit surprising we didn't have an article on Otley Hall. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:10, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the images for the Ipswich building, I have added the image to Grade I listed buildings in Ipswich. I have also started Draft:Isaacs on the Quay, since it seems like the grade I building is part of Isaacs we might as well just have 1 article for the pub its self and the surrounding buildings. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:33, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. Leutha (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leutha,

You should have received a notice when this article was PROD'd but it looks like you didn't receive a notification. Should you wish for the article to be restored, you can request it at WP:REFUND. I'm sorry that the editor who tagged the article and our notification bots neglected to inform you about this. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:24, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:45, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have quoted literally cutler and local naturalist. I have added a send source, the short text prizes Salt. Xx236 (talk) 07:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good work! Leutha (talk) 07:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Field barn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DICDEF

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:13, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leutha. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rasigan Maharajh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Leutha. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:King Street, Ipswich, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AndreZolnai not sure abt comms here Andrezolnai (talk) 15:35, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Best way to get me a public message as regards Wikipedia! Leutha (talk) 15:37, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oK now I see a Reply button. B4 I didn't so o just created a topic hoping it's correct proc. Always up2learn sthg new Andrezolnai (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"learn one new thing a day" my late gran quipped "and you'll stay young"... That's today sorted! Andrezolnai (talk) 15:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly I get Bot messages! Leutha (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Try sending a message on User talk:Caerhys. Leutha (talk) 15:41, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Caulker family of Sierra Leone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability even attempted to be attributed to the family.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chamaemelum (talk) 01:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ludwig Knoop, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:46, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Roland G. Usher, Junior requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hirolovesswords (talk) 05:59, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]