User talk:Mathiasrex

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Mathiasrex, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Johntex\talk 22:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for Polish National Government

[edit]

Hello. Good work on Polish National Government, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not provide any references or sources in the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Can you list in the article any websites, books, or other sources that will allow people to verify the content in Polish National Government? You can simply add links, preferably as inline citations, or see citation templates for different citation methods. Thanks!--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for providing the references for this article. Could you do the same for other articles you have created?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Waterloo

[edit]

Please provide appropriate references for your assertion, as it is contentious in nature. Please don't revert but use talk pages to discuss proposed changes. All the best, Ghirla | talk 10:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC) Ok even greater battle in Europe since waterloo was Battle of Olszynka Grochowska 1831, where 40 000 Poles defeated 60 000 Russians.[reply]

New articles annoucement

[edit]

Since you are creating quite a few Poland-related articles, you may want to announce them at Portal:Poland/New article announcements. Also, please see the Template:Poland-stub/Template:Battle-stub - since most of your articles are stubs you may want to tag them as such.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in joining this discussion forum.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you decide to create a user page, this page has info on nice templates to fill it up with.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:23, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

[edit]

Hello. Why are you changing redirect pages and giving new redirects to null pages? This is pointless vandalism. - Calgacus 22:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Someone (i mean some Lithuanian), deleted my new historically emended page of Władysław II Jagiełło. Mathiasrex

Request

[edit]

Pretty please, when you create a new article, tell us about it at Portal:Poland/New article announcements.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 03:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for edit summary

[edit]

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 4% for major edits and 1% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 14:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WWII pics

[edit]

Hi there! Mind if I asked where did you take all those precious colour WWII pics from? Is it the Bolas' collection by any chance? Halibutt 15:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maps

[edit]

Hi there. I noticed you violated my copyrights several times in a row. I kindly ask you to abide by the GFDL and properly attribute those maps to their author. And no, you're not the author of those maps.

Image:Irp.jpg, Image:PodlaskieIRP.JPG, Image:PodlaskieIRP.JPG, Image:SmoleńskieIRP.JPG, Image:PodlaskieRP.JPG, Image:CzernihowskieIRP.JPG, Image:WitebskieIRP.JPG, Image:PodolskieIRP.JPG, Image:MińskieIRP.JPG, Image:MścisławskieIRP.JPG, Image:PołockieIRP.JPG, Image:PoznańskieIRP.JPG, Image:RawskieIRP.JPG, Image:Irp1635.jpg, Image:IRP3Narodów.JPG, Image:PolSwedU.JPG, Image:Irp1701.jpg, Image:RP 1686.JPG, Image:RP 1701.JPG, Image:7 yearswar.JPG, Image:UPolSzwedz.JPG, Image:PolRuswar 1792.JPG, Image:PolishRuswar 1792.JPG...

Halibutt 07:24, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still waiting for your reply. However, this won't last forever. In less then a week I will ask for all of these to be deleted as copyright infringements. Or perhaps there is some other solution? //Halibutt 19:30, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mathiasrex,

I reverted your edit because the Polish name (along with the Rusisan and Latin ones) are already mentioned in the 2nd paragraph of the article. Cheers, Khoikhoi 00:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saints Wikiproject

[edit]

I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.

This user is a member of the Saints WikiProject.


Thanks! --evrik 18:21, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PodlaskieRP.JPG

[edit]

Hi Mathias. I just noticed a few errors in an image uploaded by you: (Image:PodlaskieRP.JPG).

The legend says that the map shows the 1635 situation, but the Danish-Swedish border is wrong. In 1635, all of Skåneland was Danish territory. Skåneland was surrendered in 1658. On the positive side: the island Saaremaa (= Øsel / Ösel) in Estonia is coloured correctly. It was surrendered in 1645. Lastly, Karlskrona (modern Sweden) was founded after the 1658 war. If you've made similar maps using the same year as basis, you might want to check them as well. Otherwise a very nice map. Regards. Valentinian (talk) 20:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Hello Mathiasrex! Thank you for your contributions related to Poland. You may be interested in visiting Portal:Poland/Poland-related Wikipedia notice board, joining our discussions and sharing your creations with us.

--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at our new article Jogaila with special attention paid to the vote. Pawel z Niepolomic 14:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Smok

[edit]

Jeśli ta fotka image:Polish galeon Smok.PNG była zrobiona w jakimś muzeum, warto byłoby to napisać. Pibwl ←« 18:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 18 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article cursed soldiers, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

trireme

[edit]

May I put this image Image:Romtrireme.jpg to Commons ? thanks fr:Discussion Utilisateur:Vincnet

Wladyslaw II.

[edit]

You can look at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image_talk:W%C5%82adys%C5%82aw_II.jpg ? Tabularius

Provide the sources for your assertions, please. The Belarusian aspect of his work is well-known from the Belarusian academic literature. Yury Tarasievich 06:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

trzy rewerty

[edit]

Złamanie zasady trzech revertów nalezy zglaszac na WP:ANI/3RR. Z innej beczki, nie wiedzialem ze istnieje marksistowska wersja powstania Fed. - przydalby sie artykul o roznych pogladach (marskistowska nie znaczy zawsze 'zla').-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:19, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Untagged image

[edit]

An image you uploaded, Image:Schildoh.png, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 04:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Zbroja 1514.JPG

[edit]

You've uploaded the above image to Commons. Would you please clarify on its page what museum has the armor in its collection, or should I say, where exactly was the picture taken? I'm looking for something similar for the article on National Museum in Kraków. Greetings. Poeticbent 12:14, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Kellner

[edit]

I wonder if you might contact me by email, at rskellner AT cox DOT net concerning the Friedrich Kellner WWII diary. There is information about the diary on the German and English Wikipedia sites, and I am hoping to find a way to get it on Polish Wikipedia as well. I would greatly appreciate assistance. Thank you, Dr. Robert Scott Kellner, College Station, Texas

Jellybeans

[edit]
You have been awarded these Jelly Beans from -The Doctor- Please, enjoy them.

Here are some Jelly beans for you. I love jelly beans as they have sugar in them and most people love sugar. But on the other hand just receiving somthing from somone else just makes you happy and also just giving this to you makes me happy. I hope to spread the jelly beans all over Wikipedia, so here, you can have this lot. Please enjoy them. (I like the lime ones.)

Editors need a bit of a sugar high too.

An apple a day keeps -The Doctor- away. Or does it! (talk)(contribs) 02:20, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible renaming of Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints

[edit]

It has been suggested that the above named project be renamed Wikipedia:WikiProject Christian saints. Please express your opinion on this proposed renaming, and the accompanying re-definition of the scope of the project, here. John Carter 17:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Schildoh.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Schildoh.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfAr

[edit]

Hi, I see you added some evidence against Piotrus. I'm afraid it's too late as voting has started already. Could you check Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Piotrus/Workshop and propose a remedy (or a finding of fact) which you think may be feasible? --Ghirla-трёп- 12:30, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mister Mathiasrex,

I would very much like to know from where you got the information that the great polish artist Henryk Tomaszewski has been a spy, and has even denounced his friends to the Communist Secret Police. It is a n extremely grave accuse, and it should be documented . Please send your answer to this e-mail address: [email protected] Thank you Roberta Taddei

Copernicus

[edit]

¿Why does Copernicus was not a Polish and Dürer and Beethoven were Germans? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nationalism Patrol (talkcontribs) 13:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Citation requested

[edit]

From a work you cited: see Talk:Mikołaj Hussowczyk#Quote and translation request.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  17:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obrazki

[edit]

Skad wiesz ze Image:Antoni Benedykt Konstanty Lubomirski (XVIII-1761).jpg jest lepszym opisem niz Image:Andrzej Mokronowski (1713-1784).jpg? -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  06:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, skasowalem.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  22:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Łańcut Palace

[edit]

Na commons dodalem zestaw portetow z Lancuta, ale w wiekszosci przypadkow nie byly opisane. Moze jakies zidenifikujesz... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 17:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marie Curie as a Légion d'honneur recipient

[edit]

Hi. You recently added Marie Curie to Category:Légion d'honneur recipients. However, it is fairly well known that she (and Pierre) refused this distinction. I have therefore reverted your edit. If you can cite a reliable source saying otherwise, please do so -- either in the article itself, or on Talk:Marie Curie. Thanks, Hqb (talk) 14:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Radziwiłł - piorun czy grzmot?

[edit]

Please see Talk:Krzysztof Mikołaj "the Thunderbolt" Radziwiłł#Lightning or Thunderbolt?. I believe Lightning is better (posted there).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 17:57, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you have a look at Image:Wilhelm1.jpg, please? Since the source is missing, they want to delete it. It seems that you have uploaded the original picture. Thank you! --Liberal Freemason (talk) 11:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LGBT Category

[edit]

Hi, Mathiasrex! I notice that you added Jerzy Zawieyski and Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz to the Category:LGBT people from Poland. They really can't be categorized like that unless a) they really are gay or bisexual, b) the article states their sexuality, and c) there's a reliable source included. Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 17:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

[edit]

For creating a bunch of useful categories. May I suggest annoucing them at WP:PWNB talk or new articles section?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked for input on deletion at PWNB talk, you may want to endorse my request. Regarding the law, I don't know, unfortunately; you may want to ask it there, too.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:47, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There seem to be some problem with the pictures.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 00:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Przydatne

[edit]

Category:Polish navigational boxes.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 01:04, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lithuanian Seimas

[edit]

Co do Template:Seimas of Lithuania, sugerowalbym stworzenie osobnego szablonu dla czasow PLC. Nazwa szablonu jest mylaca, ale takze - bylo tych sejmow kilkadziesiat jesli nie ponad 100, i nie ma co przeladowywac wielkim szablonem sejmow po 1795.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 02:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ano. Z np. Election sejm of 1632 (w tym jednym roku byly bodajze 3 sejmy...). No a sejmiki... -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 02:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]
Updated DYK query On 15 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Otto Magnus von Stackelberg (ambassador), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Royalbroil 14:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated DYK query On December 18, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Judeopolonia, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Royalbroil 03:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wisława Szymborska

[edit]

Thanks for your recent, interesting edits to Wisława Szymborska. Could you please give a source for them? And please keep in mind that the tag "minor" is just for edits which are actually minor (say, a misplaced comma), not for adding claims of some relevance. Thank, happy editing, Goochelaar (talk) 00:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wesołych!

[edit]
User:Piotrus and friends, in the midsts of Wigilia, wish you to enjoy this Christmas Eve!

Barnstar

[edit]
The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
I, Tymek (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC), am awarding you this Barnstar in appreciation of your excellent work on Poland-related topics. Good job![reply]

Pytanie o IWŚ

[edit]

Mam do ciebie jako znawcy historii pytanie. Pamiętam trochę informację o tym, iż pierwsza bitwa w IWŚ Polaków jako własnej strony miała miejsce gdy oddziały mające z sobą walczyć Rosji i Austrii(albo Niemiec) składające się z Polaków odmówiły rozkazu i połączyły swe siły w walce przeciw reszcie wojska. Niestety nie mogę sobie dokładnie przypomnieć szczegółów kiedy i gdzie to miało miejsce. Może ty wiesz ?--Molobo (talk) 20:09, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mathiasrex!

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

You are receiving this invitation because you are a member of one of the related Christianity Projects and I thought that you might be interested in this project also - Tinucherian (talk) 04:49, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello Mathiasrex! Welcome to Wikiproject Christianity! Thank you for joining. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - Tinucherian (talk) 11:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC) [reply]
Getting Started
Useful Links
Miscellaneous
Work Groups
Projects
Similar WikiProjects

Mazowiecki

[edit]

Hello, would you like to take part in a discussion with Polish administrators regarding blocking and/or removing facts from the Mazowiecki's bio? -> [1] Greetings, Uprzejmy (pl.wiki) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.111.35.174 (talk) 02:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

[edit]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter

[edit]

You may be interested in discussions at...

[edit]

Talk:Administrative division of Polish territories after partitions and Talk:Polish historical regions.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity WikiProject Newsletter - July 2008

[edit]

This Newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 09:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Edit summaries?

[edit]

Hi. I notice you never use edit summaries. Please do that, so that others can see what content you are adding to articles. Thanks. Fred-J 22:13, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:IPotocki.jpg

[edit]

Image:IPotocki.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:IPotocki1.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:IPotocki1.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Norbertsaint.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Norberts.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SlownikGeo

[edit]

Hello Maciej! For 2 years now I have been working on a project to translate the Słownik Geograficzny Królestwa Polskiego (1880-1902) from Polish to German (part of it goes to GenWiki and to Wikipedia). Although I use machine translation and a Polish-German dictionary (1878) there are about 10 ancient Polish expressions (1-3 words long) which I was not yet able to translate. Could I place these expressions here (or alternatively Do yo know a native Polish speaker with knowledge in German who could help me?). Sincerely Grey Geezer

Hello Maciej! Thank you very much for your offer! I put up some expressions, where I couldn't find the marked words (the codes above are reminders for myself). No rush... Sincerely Grey Geezer —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.141.221.231 (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Whow, you're fast! Thanks a lot! Next sentences in about 3 weeks or so.. Thanx! --83.141.221.231 (talk) 19:14, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mathiasrex, may I ask another question? Quite a few (old?) Polish village names - for example Rymiatowszczyzna, Moniatowszczyzna, Spitowszczyzna Sibitowszczyzna, Zborowszczyzna - end on szczyzna. What does that ending mean? I was not able to find it (what could bee its root?) in Polish dictionaries. Thanks very much for your help!. -- 09:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Andrzej Stanisław Załuski

[edit]

Hello Maciej! Can you please tell, where one can find the original painting of Andrzej Stanisław Załuski you have added ( Andrzej Stanisław Załuski Bishop of Kraków, from anonymous XVIII century painting image taken by User:Mathiasrex Maciej Szczepańczyk) - the place, where it is displayed, I mean. Thank you. m.e.g. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.76.93.44 (talk) 19:21, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidates for the Polish elective throne

[edit]

Hello! I've seen that you added this category to Prince George of Denmark and Christina of Sweden. Could you please add this information to their articles and include some details if possible? It's an important fact for both of the articles, since George was husband of the Queen of Great Britain and Christina was Queen of Sweden (and later a candidate for Neapolitan throne) - if they were elected, Poland would enter a personal union. It's also important to note that George could not convert to Catholicism without his wife being deposed. An interesting situation would've arisen if either one of them was elected. So, could you please write something about them being considered a possible King of Poland? Surtsicna (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jesli to bedzie czestsze, dwa wandalizmy na miesiac nie ma sensu... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 20:14, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Teraz sa czestsze - semi na 2 tygodnie. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 17:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Northumberland image

[edit]

I have removed the image you (re)added to the HMS Northumberland article, which you clearly disagree with, so I will explain my reasoning to you.

I question that the model is of Northumberland, due to a glaring problem with the ship's rig. She is shown carrying a lateen mizzen yard, whereas these were replaced by gaffs attached to the mizzen mast via jaws and parrels in the 1780s, and a short time later a boom was added for the foot of the sail. No ship launched in 1798 would ever have carried a lateen mizzen yard. Additionally the sail is shown extending the full length of the yard, a practise that had fallen out of use some time before even the 1780s, hence the eventual change to the gaff. So based on that alone, the model cannot be of Northumberland, or if it is intended to be, it is a serious error that makes it non-representative.

The hull itself contains numerous issues, the most noticeable of which being the poop deck apparently running level with the capping rail of the poop bulwark. The overall quality of the model is also not particularly great, so really it can only be called a generic model of a third rate, and is most certainly not representative of Northumberland of 1798. Martocticvs (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - April 2009

[edit]

Re:Bad map

[edit]

Point it out on the map talk page, and to the map creator. Create a better map and replace the bad map. Tag the bad map with an appropriate template. We don't really have a right template, see my suggestion here.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 16:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that Category:Victims of Communist repressions in Poland 1939-1989, which you created, is being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_April_30#Victims_of_political_repression. Your input is welcome.--Aervanath (talk) 06:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Internment

[edit]

Who said they were the same? Not me. NKVD Special camps imprisoned soldiers, not civilians, and so they don't qualify as interment under the definition in the article. Why should they be included in the article? - TheMightyQuill (talk) 15:11, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And don't call me a vandal. I've been a registered user for 3 years, and have made an enormous number of constructive edits to that specific article. - TheMightyQuill (talk) 15:12, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well of course it matters. It matters just as much as every other horrible thing done by the Soviets, or by everyone else, to those they considered criminals. The prison at Guantanamo Bay for "unlawful combatants" matters too. But we shouldn't list all of those things on the internment article, because they aren't particularly relevant. Why are Polish experiences somehow more important that all the other cases of internment included on List of concentration and internment camps that they belong in the internment article? - TheMightyQuill (talk) 22:56, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've reintroduced the Bar Confederation content. As for the Auschwitz thing, if it's true, you should include it at Auschwitz concentration camp. Personally, I have my doubts, but you seem to desire to blame everything from the Holocaust on the Soviet Union, so go try arguing it on the talk page there.- TheMightyQuill (talk) 13:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - May 2009

[edit]

I've been working on Territorial changes of Poland trying to find links for each Territorial changes. I wondering if you know where I can find out more information about the following Territorial changes:

  • The Orawa and Spisz regions that were passed to Poland at Conference of Ambassadors in Spa, Belgium on 28 July 1920. I can't find any references on A)If they were passed to Poland and B) If they were given to Poland why were they requested by Poland
  • Can't find any references that say, "an additional exchange of territories in Orava - the territory around Nižná Lipnica went to Poland, the territory around Suchá Hora and Hladovka went to Czechoslovakia. The new frontiers were confirmed by a Czechoslovak-Polish Treaty on April 24, 1925 and are identical with present-day borders."
  • Can't find any references that for the 1948 transfer of the Village of Medyka near Przemyśl was transferred to Poland

Any help would be great -- Esemono (talk) 02:39, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - June 2009

[edit]

I have nominated Category:People executed in effigie for treason against Poland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:People executed in effigy for treason against Poland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:32, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my notes under this heading on the talk pages of "Lucas Watzenrode the Elder" and "Jan Łaski." I think you have misidentified them both as "canons" through confusion with their namesakes. In such cases, caution is recommended. Nihil novi (talk) 21:59, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarifications.
My compliments on all your fine work. I especially admire your many fine photos. Nihil novi (talk) 22:44, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations

[edit]

Do you by any chance have access to a good reproduction of Maria Wodzińska's 1835 watercolor portrait of Chopin? Or of Antoni Kamieński's 1897 portrait of Bolesław Prus?

Wodzińska's portrait or a reproduction of it might perhaps be found at one of the Chopin societies or at Warsaw's "Chopin salon" on Krakowskie Przedmieście.

Photos of these portraits would be helpful for the respective articles. Nihil novi (talk) 23:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been nominated for membership of the Established Editors Association

[edit]

The Established editors association will be a kind of union of who have made substantial and enduring contributions to the encyclopedia for a period of time (say, two years or more). The proposed articles of association are here - suggestions welcome.

If you wish to be elected, please notify me here. If you know of someone else who may be eligible, please nominate them here

Discussion is here.Peter Damian (talk) 17:23, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Origine du portrait de Jan Ledóchowski.

[edit]

Cher Mathias,

Jan Ledóchowski est un de mes ancetres par ma mere, et je viens de decouvrir le portrait que vous avez documente sur WikiPedia. Je suis a la recherche de toute information ou document sur mes ancetre Ledóchowski plus particulierement pour la periode 1715-1880, periode agitee durant laquelle different membre de ma famille ont pris part a de nombreux evenements, et se sont beaucoup deplaces en Europe. Je souhaiterai connaitre l'origine de ce portrait, et vos sources vous permettant d'affirmer de facon certaine que ce portrait est bien celui du Comte Jan Ledóchowski ne en 1790, sortie officer de cavalerie de l'ecole de guerre de Vienne en 1807, aide de camp du Prince Poniatowski et ami du baron Claude-François de Méneval, et dont le frere Joseph Ledóchowski epousa une soeur de Marie Walewska, née Laczynska.

Je vous remercie par avance, ainsi que tout autre contributeur, de toute information que vous pourrez me faire suivre. PBMFrance (talk) 16:46, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - July 2009

[edit]
The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter

Archives  |  Tip Line  |  Editors

The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter
Issue X - July 2009
Project news
  • The Christianity project and its related projects currently have 76 FAs, 8 FLs, and 148 GAs. We gained new recognized content in each field, with 4 FAs promoted, 2 FLs, and 3 GAs. Congratulations and a big thank you to all those who worked on these articles!
Member news
Other news
  • I am still working on the categorization matter. With any luck, we should have some results by the end of the month. There are also some discussions regarding project related activities at Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/General Forum. One issue in particular that might be addressed is possible elections of new coordinators. Anyone interested in serving in such a capacity is more than welcome to indicate as much.
Related projects news
Member contest of the month
  • The previous contests are still ongoing, because of the extreme amount of time the categorization is taking me. Anyone who can bring any of the few Stub class articles among the project's 1000 most often accessed articles by the end of July will get an award. Please see the details Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity#Project challenge of the month.
Christianity related news
From the Members

Welcome to the Tenth issue of the WikiProject Christianity newsletter! Use this newsletter as a mechanism to inform yourselves about progress at the project and please be inspired to take more active roles in what we do.

It has been a long time since the last coordinators election. There is a lot for people to do, and I certainly would welcome seeing any individuals with an interest in such a position put themselves forward as candidates. I in particular would very much like to see some degree of "specialization" in the coordinators, so that, for instance, we might have someone knowledgable about some of the specific Christian faith traditions or other main subjects, like Orthodoxy, Lutheranism, Mormonism, the Jehovah's Witnesses, art, theology, and so on. If any parties who have experience with some of our faith- or- subject-based content would be interested in being candidates, I would love to see them do so. Please feel free to take part in the discussion regading what the minimum number of category items is, and how to deal with the non-qualifying categories, on the General Forum page.

John Carter (talk) 23:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.
This newsletter is automatically delivered by ~~~~

John Carter (talk) 23:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity Newsletter - August 2009

[edit]

Re: Plica polonica

[edit]

I didn't write that you were wrong about Christian IV. My point is that you only removed the illustration, but didn't modify the text. You shoud either remove the reference to Christian completely from the article or, better, tag it as lacking citation. — Kpalion(talk) 17:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copy & paste move and move without discussion

[edit]

Two things re Laurynas Gucevičius: a) Please do not move pages by copying & pasting. It destroys page's history, which is required to comply with copyrights). b) Do not make controversial moves before asking on the talk page or going through WP:RM procedure. Thanks, Renata (talk) 22:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Protection

[edit]

No problem! Some of my family was from Galicia and others from Wilno. :) Pats1 T/C 19:10, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Louis the Great

[edit]

Hello! Can you expand (with 2-3 sentences) the "Determinant laws" section in Louis the Great article? Louis (as King of Poland) created some very important determinant Polish laws. Thank you! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.44.3.44 (talk) 09:55, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR rule

[edit]
Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. M.K. (talk) 17:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Know your forks

[edit]

For Webster's see: Wikipedia:Mirrors_and_forks/Ghi#Icon_Group_International & Philip_M._Parker#Automatically_generated_books & example copyright page. Renata (talk) 12:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jogaila

[edit]

In 1387 Jogaila was still Grand Duke. The distinction between Supreme/Grand Dukes comes into play only after Ostrow Agreement of 1392 when Vytautas comes in power. Skirgaila, who was left to rule Lithuania in Jogaila's name, is not considered a Grand Duke but just a regent. Renata (talk) 15:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MR - just to let you know, I'm still pondering the best presentation of this issue. However, as a general rule, I think it best to keep content discussions at article talk pages rather than user talk pages, apart from friendly chatter or serious conduct issues. I believe this approach is widely approved.[citation needed] Novickas (talk) 03:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: January Suchodolski on Haitian Revolution

[edit]

Mr. Szczepańczyk,

We are producing a documentary film on the Haitian earthquake, and our editors are interested in making use of an image credited to your Wikipedia account. It is a painting entitled "Bitwa na San Domingo" by January Suchodolski. We have contacted the Polish Museum in Rapperswil, and they haven't been able to provide us with the location of the original painting or the owner of licenses to this painting.

Our questions for you are: do you have a high-resolution version of your photograph available, and do you know who we would contact to license your image?

We are working under a very tight deadline, so please respond as soon as you can.

Best wishes, and much admiration for your contributions to Wikipedia,

Colin Beattie [email protected] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.254.71.66 (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Dzierzon

[edit]

Imie i nazwisko Dzierzona zostalo zmieniona na Johann Dzierzon, to jest pisownia niemiecka. Britanica podaje Jan Dzierżoń (http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/175400/Jan-Dzierzon) i tak powinno byc. Rowniez tu (http://bees.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=bees;idno=5017629) angielskie tlumaczenie pracy Dzierzona podaje Dzierżon, Jan. Czy skontaktowales sie z museum w Kluczborku, albo przeczytales dowody i fotokopie w podanych pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka? Pomijanie zrodel polskich jest niedopuszczalne. Ci ktorzy chca zmieniac artykul powinni uznac wage zrodel polskich wage a nie lawirowac na drugorzednych przekladach i niepelnych zrodlach. Podane tez sa wspolczesne artykuly w prasie polskiej i napisane przez Polakow. Trzeba je wniesc do tekstu. Niech chociaz bedzie widoczne ze spoleczenstwo polskie ma silne zdanie na ten temat. Podaje Ci e-mail jezeli chcesz powaznie pracowac bez udzialu szpiegow: [email protected]. --Soujdspo (talk) 22:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC)



Bierz zawsze pod uwage ze: 1) w okresie Bismarck'a zniemczano imiona celowo 2) Poszukiwania liczbowe zapisu imion na internecie sa falszywka - autorzy wtedy i dzisiaj powtarzaja to co zostalo zniemczone i wprowadzone w pismie, clowo, przez nieuwage lub niewiedze. Jedyna droga czy jego imie powinno byc pisane Jahann czy Jan jest stwierdzenie ze Dzierzon uwazal sie za Polaka i kultywowal polskos, i tak jest zgodnie z dokumentami opisanymi w pracach Brozka, Gladysza i ks. Mazaka etc. --Soujdspo (talk) 02:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC) --Soujdspo (talk) 02:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Clegg

[edit]

Hi there, you seem to know something about Polish heraldry. We know that Nick Clegg is the great-grandson of 'Ignaty Zakrevsky', who was a Russian diplomat in the 1890s and an attorney general in the Imperial Russian senate. 'Zakrevsky' had an estate near Kiev. Do you have any way of researching whether 'Zakrevsky' was related to Ignacy Wyssogota Zakrzewski (d.1802) ? A family tree would be ideal. -Chumchum7 (talk) 07:40, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alas his family seems to be pure Russian. (Zakrevskye) just in 1686. [2]

His ancestor Закревский, Игнатий Платонович (Ignaty Platonovich Zakrevsky) was Russian attorney general of 1th Department of Governing Senate. [3] Polish Zakrzewscy was family from Wielkopolska and is no evidence that these two familes are linked in some way. Mathiasrex (talk) 14:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. By the way, you have some cool maps. i've been trying to find one that would show ALL the Polish estates, the divisions between the Crown lands, the Radziwill lands, the Zamoyski lands, the Church lands, etc etc. I wonder whether the map of the Rzepa should really look like a map of the 'patchwork quilt' of the Holy Roman Empire. Certainly, it would better illustrate how the Rzepa wasnt a centralized state like Russia or Prussia. It would be a useful tool for historians. But I've never seen such a map. -Chumchum7 (talk) 20:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Livonia was definitely lost by Poland from 1629, even Polish WP has it: [4]. Please correct the date on the map to 1619-1629, as its a great map. -Chumchum7 (talk) 18:58, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JKChodkiewicz.jpg

[edit]

I noticed that you are the user that uploaded JKChodkiewicz.jpg; do you happen to know the name of the artist who painted the original? It's not included in the image description. siafu (talk) 16:37, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Mathiasrex! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 116 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Janusz Bojarski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:18, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Wojciech Kossak po bitwie pod Zieleńcami.jpg

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Wojciech Kossak po bitwie pod Zieleńcami.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 06:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Niemen and Vilnius

[edit]

Re: [5]. Nice except that Niemen does not flow thru Vilnius. Renata (talk) 21:06, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it. How a meeting in Vilnius on a bridge across Niemen could have taken place or had any impact on anything if the river does not flow thru the town? Renata (talk) 00:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello M. Could you please rewrite the entries about this at Vilnius and at History of Vilnius in your own words, since your additions [6], [7], were close to verbatim from Piotr S. Wandycz's book [8]. Mr. Wandycz may have been in error about the river/bridge here, but you could address that during your rewrite by shortening the entries to read just on a bridge in Vilnius. Novickas (talk) 21:46, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got your message. The problem remains - if he erred about the event's location in Vilnius, then it doesn't belong in the Vilnius articles; if as you assert, it took place in Kaunas, it could go there instead, but only if you can produce a reliable source for it. I truly don't think it would be acceptable to put it in Kaunas on the basis of your interpretation of his intent, without some sort of verifiable correction on his part; our own readings of 'what he meant' don't carry any weight on WP. You could write to him and ask him to clarify this, but of course a private email exchange would be problematic. He could however publish some sort of public statement. If that doesn't happen... you could still include this info in some other article using some sort of workaround. Novickas (talk) 22:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WRT to copyvio - I may not have made the issue clear in terms of Wikipedia copyright policy. Your revisions [9], [10] still incorporate an entire sentence from the book - 'In August 1861, manifestations in Vilnius resulted in clashes with the Russian army.' vs the book's 'In August, 1861, manifestations in Wilno resulted in clashes with the Russian army.' [11] with a one-word difference (Wilno to Vilnius). As described here, 'there is no such thing as a safe word count'.[12] If you disagree with this, you could take it to one of the copyright boards, e.g. Wikipedia:Copyright violations. If you find it difficult to reword, several options: read the guidance at Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, ask another editor, or wait for me to do it. Novickas (talk) 16:53, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Got your message. I still see your version as too close to the source, and again request that you bring this to a copyvio board if you disagree - altho they are swamped - if you don't post there within the next couple days, I'll do it. Novickas (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Janusz Bojarski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. Fails to meet biography guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 04:54, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Template:GCCh

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:GCCh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Legend of maps "made in Poland"

[edit]

@ Maciej!

Can't you help user:Poznaniak to produce his maps in international versions with English and perhaps German legend, in addition to the Polish version? "Zhołdowane" I did not even find in my dictionary – and most English and German readers have no Polish dictionary. Meanwhile, I've researched that, due to its use in pl.wiki, it may mean "subdued"/"unterworfen". But maps presented in WP ought to be understandable without special research.

Yours' sincerely, Ulamm (talk) 14:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bug

[edit]

I have changed the map to "Southern Bug", reflecting the title of the current article. Feel free to take up your other arguments elsewhere :) - Jarry1250 [Who? Discuss.] 11:19, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Monitor. WikiProject Poland Newsletter: Issue 1 (April 2011)

[edit]
WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011
For our freedom and yours

Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper).

Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised.

In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop:

This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools!

With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself?

You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:19, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

LGBT cats

[edit]

Hi Mathiasrex, thank you for your work on the articles of Polish artists and philosophers. Please add categories only where there is sourcing given in the article. With Bronisław Malinowski, Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz, ‎ Józef Czapski, Konstanty Jeleński and Czesław Miłosz you added LGBT cats with no cites given. WP:EGRS notes "Inclusion [in a category] must be justifiable by external references... Categories that make allegations about sexuality – such as "closeted homosexuals" or "people suspected to be gay" – are not acceptable under any circumstances." Thank you. Span (talk) 12:52, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Span (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not Russian

[edit]

They were, sadly, Polish-Lithuanian, not Russians: [13], [14]. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 17:12, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, this is correct. You may be interested in this and this. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 20:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
See here, please. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ignacy Krasicki portrait

[edit]
The Commons hold 2 portraits of Ignacy Krasicki by Per Kraft that are both labeled identically "File:Ignacy Krasicki.JPG".
One is your color portrait of 26 July 2006.
The other is a black-and-white portrait that now appears on the "Fables and Parables" page.
I would like to replace the black-and-white portrait with your color one; but I'm unable to do this because both carry the same label.
Could you possibly change the label on your color portrait -- or submit the portrait again under a different label?
Is this the maximum sharpness available with this portrait?
Where can the Per Kraft original be found?
I have long admired your photography. I would appreciate any help you could give with the Ignacy Krasicki portrait.
Thanks.
Nihil novi (talk) 06:43, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your help with the seated portrait in "Ignacy Krasicki".
Actually, what I need is your small color portrait to substitute for the black-and-white one that appears in Krasicki's "Fables and Parables".
Best,
Nihil novi (talk) 09:10, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What I have in mind is the half-length colored portrait of Krasicki, photographed by you, that appears [15] here.
Thanks. Nihil novi (talk) 01:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Have you looked at [16] ? Your Krasicki portrait there is in color. That's the picture I want to put on the "Fables and Parables" page, instead of the similar but black-and-white image. Nihil novi (talk) 08:52, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's probably missed original portrait by Krafft, [17], take notice on difference between this one [18] Mathiasrex (talk) 09:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that they both have the same label: "File:Ignacy Krasicki.JPG" -- which I think is why I'm unable to change the black-and-white version to the color one. Nihil novi (talk) 09:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sądzę, że problem możnaby łatwo rozwiązać, gdybyś mógł stworzyć wersję swej barwnej fotografii z inną etykietką. Nihil novi (talk) 09:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Czyli chodzi Ci tylko o zmianę nazwy pliku czy o zmianę grafiki na kolorową. Są to dwa różne obrazy, co widać w różnicy pomiędzy szczegółami (w kolorowym Krasicki ma coś co wygląda na część kaptura). Mathiasrex (talk) 09:26, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The first is not simply colour version of image in en wiki but is another portrait. Mathiasrex (talk) 09:23, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I know. And that (your color portrait) is the one I'd like to use on "Fables and Parables". But I can't because it carries the same label as the black-and-white portrait. Nihil novi (talk) 09:29, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tak -- chodzi o zmianę nazwy pliku, żeby można było użyć na "Fables and Parables". Nihil novi (talk) 09:32, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
dałem do zmiany nazwy na commons musimy zaczekać, chyba prościej byłoby skasować czarno-biały z en wiki i załadować go pod inną nazwą na commons. Mathiasrex (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Można skasować. Inna wersja czarno-biała, stworzona przez Wyciorka (19 II 2006) juź istnieje pod nazwą "File:Ignacy-Krasicki-oil.jpg". Nihil novi (talk) 09:58, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tym bardziej, że czarno-białej "File:Ignacy Krasicki.JPG" brak, jak to stwierdzono na pliku, pewnych niezbędnych informacji (które znajdują się na pliku "File:Ignacy-Krasicki-oil.jpg" [19]: "Ignacy Krasicki, obraz olejny, 1767, Per Krafft").
Czy umiałbyś czarno-białe "File:Ignacy Krasicki.JPG" ([20]) zlikwidować? Nihil novi (talk) 05:52, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your beautiful new portrait of Ignacy Krasicki [21].
I've placed it in 6 articles which previously showed less authentic portraits. Your illustration adds greatly to the articles' attractiveness.
Thanks for your efforts and patience! Nihil novi (talk) 02:20, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

[edit]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

April 2012

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Doc talk 02:17, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: May 2012

[edit]

ICHTHUS

May 2012

From the Editor

[edit]

This month marks the observation of Pentecost, one of the most important feast of the Christian liturgical year. It is our hope here that all of you, regardless of your religious affiliation (if any), find that the holiday, and its accompanying activities, an enjoyable and beneficial experience. We also hope that this "Birthday of the Church" is one which gives you the same joy as the birthday of yourself or your loved ones.

Ichthus is the successor to the long running WikiProject Christianity newsletter, run under the WikiProject Christianity’s Outreach department. As such, you will continue to see information about our latest featured and good articles, DYKs, as well as new members who have joined our project. You might also see links to Christianity related news from the mainstream media!

With that, I wish you all happy reading!

John Carter, Asst. Editor

P.S. Please click here to add the new Christianity-related topics Noticeboard to your watchlist to follow the latest discussions relevant to WikiProject Christianity and subprojects.

Help Bring Wikipe-tan "into the fold"

[edit]

As many of you may know, our unofficial mascot, dear Wikipe-tan, hasn't yet indicated any particular beliefs. However, yes, as we all know, ahem, some people might object to our beloved mascot running around in a French maid outfit. People do talk, you know. ;) If anyone might be able to develop an image of the dear lady in a image more, well, "Christian," I would like to see perhaps a vote for next month as to which, if any, image of the dear girl we might make our own unofficial mascot. Please post your images here.

By John Carter

Christianity in other wikis

[edit]
As many of you might now, there are a large number of other Wikimedia Foundation projects, including WikiSource, Wiktionary, Wikibooks, WikiQuote, and others. I certainly believe that Wikibooks and Wikiquote might be among the more directly relevant sister projects. If any of you can think of any particular efforts in these other projects which you think would benefit from more input, please let us know here, so we can help spread the word around.

By John Carter

Spotlight on the Outreach department

[edit]

Ichthus will spotlight a different subproject or workgroup of WikiProject Christianity. This edition will spotlight on our vital Outreach department. This comparatively small, but vital, project unit is dedicated to welcoming new editors to Wikipedia and the Christianity related content, and to providing information to the various project members, in forms like this newsletter.

The scope of articles with which this group deals is truly enormous, and, given the wide variety of material with which we deal, we would very much welcome the input of more individuals, particularly individuals who are particularly knowledgeable of the less well-known and less frequently monitored articles related to Christianity.

Speaking personally, I would be very, very gratified if we were to have this become a very, very large and active unit, with members from the broad spectrum of Christian beliefs, practices, and groups. The broader the spectrum and areas of expertise of members we have, the better we will be able to help manage the content. Please consider whether you believe you might be able to contribute in this vital area.

By John Carter


Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
EdwardsBot (talk) 20:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Ichthus: June 2012

[edit]

ICHTHUS

June 2012

Membership report

[edit]

The parent Christianity WikiProject currently has 331 active members. We would like to welcome User:Sanju87, User:Psalm84, User:Zegron, User:Jargon777, User:Calu2000, User:Gilderien, User:Ronallenus, Thank you all for your interest in this effort. If any members, new or not, wish any assistance, they should feel free to leave a message at the Christianity noticeboard or with me or other individual editors to request it.

From the Editor

[edit]

Ichthus is one of the ways that the WikiProject Christianity’s Outreach department helps update our members. We have recently added some new sections to the newsletter. Please let us know what you think of the new departments, and if there are any other suggestions for departments you would like to see. And if you have anything you would personally like to add, by all means let us know. The talk page of the current issue is probably the best place to post such comments.

With that, I wish you all happy reading!

P.S. Please click here to add the new Christianity noticeboard to your watchlist to follow the latest discussions relevant to WikiProject Christianity and subprojects.

Church of the month

[edit]

by Berthold Werner
Saint Catherine's Monastery, Mount Sinai

Vote for the project mascot<