User talk:MikeAllen
Welcome to my talk page!
- Please use the Reply button to reply to a message, or add topic (+) to start a new section.
- If I have left a message on your talk page, please DO NOT post a reply here, instead, reply there.
- Mention me using the "Mention a user" button in the Reply box or type out {{ping|MikeAllen}}.
- I will have your talk page on watch and will note when you have replied.
- If you prefer to manually edit the page to post:
- Use an accurate and appropriate heading.
- Indent your comment by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
- Sign your post with four tildes (~~~~) at the end.
The Roses movie
[edit]Is Manual Art of style really exempted from basing the countries from the production companies the country is based from? If you based it on the info box it should be a British film so I want to know it’s exempted from the info box guidelines? 122.3.133.206 (talk) 00:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Re: reliable source on THE SUBSTANCE
[edit]Looking for your thoughts on a revert that you made to my edit last week on The Substance. I understand the revert and rightfully so because I'm a brand-spanking new account, but after seeking consensus on the talk page, they seem to be in favor of its inclusion. Would you object to my reintroducing the essay as a source? Althomas39 (talk) 16:35, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Warning users
[edit]Hi, friendly reminder to warn users after you revert their edits. Happy editing (and reverting), GoldRomean (talk) 00:08, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Woah, that's cool! The font changed! GoldRomean (talk) 00:09, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).
- An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.
- A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
- History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.
- An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
- An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
Meg 2: The Trench
[edit]Hello, @MikeAllen I saw that my edit for Belle Avery and Apelles Entertainment Links were rollbacked from the Meg 2: The Trench movie page article. I saw a note for manual of style issue. I am not sure I understand what the issue is with my links? Am I not allowed to link to their bios like the rest of the producers and studios in the movie? Trek Rover (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- We don’t link to an external website in the prose of the page. We can add a link to a their Wikipedia page if they have one. WP:ELBODY Also you may want to check out WP:COI. Mike Allen 10:11, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Anyone But You poster.jpg
[edit]
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
"Breathe (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit] The redirect Breathe (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 June 16 § Breathe (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 12:30, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Hot Mess (upcoming film)
[edit]
Hello, MikeAllen. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hot Mess".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 00:25, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Wonka
[edit]Wonka is also based on the 2005 film. Why did you delete what I added? 140.32.197.35 (talk) 21:05, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
The Final Reckoning
[edit]Hi! It’s been a while. I’m writing to tell you that I might be close to getting involved in an edit war in Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning. If you can check whether or not the involved IP made those edits to fluff up the plot or genuinely give readers more context, that’d be appreciated so I don’t break the three-revert rule. Thanks! Nicole. Oh, she's elegantly clandestine... ✨ 03:21, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:The Faculty (upcoming film)
[edit] Hello, MikeAllen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Faculty (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:10, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – July 2025
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2025).

Interface administrator changes
- Following a talk page discussion, speedy deletion criterion G13 has been amended to remove "Userspace with no content except the article wizard placeholder text."
- WP:Manual of Style/Superscripts and subscripts was upgraded to a guideline following a RfC discussion.
- The 2025 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
- Administrator elections will take place this month. Administrator elections are an alternative to RFA that is a gentler process for candidates due to secret voting and multiple people running together. The call for candidates is July 9–15, the discussion phase is July 18–22, and the voting phase is July 23–29. Get ready to submit your candidacy, or (with their consent) to nominate a talented candidate!
Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates
[edit]The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/July 2025/Candidates.
Here is the schedule:
- July 9–15 - Call for candidates
- July 18–22 - Discussion phase
- July 23–29 - SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
- The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
- Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
- The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.
- The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.
- Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
Your draft article, Draft:Dead Guy (film)
[edit]
Hello, MikeAllen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dead Guy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 10 July 2025 (UTC)