User talk:Orlando Davis

Not-Sheldon Cooper

Hello, and you put up a spirited defense that was fun to watch, but many more of those high-energy discussions probably not the best idea. Volunteers tend to have time limits, and then might get irritated. As for the designer, it looks like the article just needs a couple more good sources to cross the line. Hopefully more publications will write up a page on him. I have no idea why interviews don't count, I think people have tried explaining it once or twice, but it seems to me that if a publication does an interview they usually have an introduction to the interview in the publications voice which likely could be used as a good source (maybe they are, I haven't memorized the entire rules and regs manuals). Nice collabing with you, hopeful that Cooper's page will have its day. Randy Kryn (talk) 01:59, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree. It's best to not have too many high energy discussions that get people irritated. I will work on trying to get a couple more good sources. It was nice collabing with you also. I appreciate your help. Orlando Davis (talk) 02:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Irritated Wikipedians? They can be found at dusk near the watering hole, co-mingling with the IP's and the admins. The key is to be brief, courteous, know which watering holes to enjoy and which to avoid, and drink your share but don't make others wait in line too long. Randy Kryn (talk) 14:49, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Randy! I appreciate the advice! Orlando Davis (talk) 15:32, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Insurgent Cuba has been accepted

Insurgent Cuba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 11:37, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Miniature Engineering Craftsmanship Museum's Craftsman of the Year award (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Miniature Engineering Craftsmanship Museum's Craftsman of the Year award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Orlando Davis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 22:18, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shantytown (book) has been accepted

Shantytown (book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MediaKyle (talk) 18:54, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Final Exam (book) has been accepted

Final Exam (book), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 02:39, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Miniature Engineering Craftsmanship Museum's Craftsman of the Year award (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Miniature Engineering Craftsmanship Museum's Craftsman of the Year award and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 01:55, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Invention of the Jewish Gaucho has been accepted

The Invention of the Jewish Gaucho, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gheus (talk) 02:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]