User talk:PEPSI697

This is PEPSI697's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days

PLEASE NOTE BEFORE LEAVING A NEW TOPIC OR REPLY ON MY TALK PAGE: This user has ASD, so this user can be very sensitive to certain things, this means no swearing, commenting on me, abuse or a impolite way another user talks out to this user, all of those don't(s) are NOT tolerated here, if it happens, they will not be archived and will be removed from here by me. I would request users to be civil on this talk page. Also, in this user talk page Please also keep this talk page for Wikipedia related content only. Warnings or if you want to let me know something, that is totally accepted here. Thank you for noticing!

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present.

Hi, I would like to let contributors know that I'll sometimes contribute to Wikipedia until 19 July 2025 due to not having my PC or laptop with me and only my phone due to being away overseas. That will mean that I would not be patrolling recent changes or less likely for 3 weeks. But will still look at the progress for the Preston railway station article for GA status or if any more suggestions come up. I plan to edit more on Friday, 27 June. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 05:03, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have patrolled recent changes briefly today, but will only do a few on some selected days (not every single day until 18 July) and will mainly used tools for vandalism only, not anything else. If I do revert anything, I'll be reverting unsourced content or unexplained content removal by manually reverting or the restore feature. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 04:27, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Preston railway station, Melbourne you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Preston railway station, Melbourne for comments about the article, and Talk:Preston railway station, Melbourne/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Icepinner -- Icepinner (talk) 15:29, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the work of Jessel's 'Lord of the Manor', the recent edits are correct and supported by reliable authority. SPQHH (talk) 19:35, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that I was involved in any of this according to your talk page and contributions. Can you please provide some diffs on where I was involved? PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 21:12, 12 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@PEPSI697 must have been in error: forgive me! SPQHH (talk) 12:36, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I understand that these things happens sometimes. I forgive you for that. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 21:01, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'd like to address the contributions I made to the wikipedia page for the UEFA Women's Euro 2025 final. I added a background section, which I vetted out and made sure everything was correct, adjusted the "Route to the final" section so the paragraphs were 1) split up for easier reading and 2) made a bit more concise while adding new and relevant information, and removed the unnecessary prematch section because it only talked about Sarina Wiegman and other infomation that wasn't accurate or didn't need to be said. Yes, I acknowledge that I didn't describe my changes. I am sorry and I'm working on that to make sure whatever changes I make here are with reason. But in my defense, everything I put down was researched, correct, and (above all) accessible. Thank you. 2600:8801:2B15:2800:35FA:892A:B21D:FCF9 (talk) 07:00, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I can actually see that I've made a mistake instead of restoring content, I remove a lot of your sourced content in your new section you've created in "Background". I believe you've added those sources as it said they were published and accessed on 27 July 2025 (today)? From what I know, you did pretty much nothing wrong except this edit summary had all caps locks and used "lol" in it, try to avoid using all caps and using "lol". All caps locks can be considered WP:SHOUTING and "lol" from my POV is considered trolling on Wikipedia. Anyways, would you like me to restore your revisions and self revert for you? Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 07:19, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes please, if you could restore my edits, that would be well appreciated.

I'd like to apologize for my immaturity in adding "lol" to my edit summary. I was eager with how to improve the page that I wasn't thinking straight. I will do better when I make any future edits, it was just very spur-of-the-moment. 2600:8801:2B15:2800:35FA:892A:B21D:FCF9 (talk) 07:25, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: Restored your revisions here and self reverted. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 07:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

pls revert your restoring edit, i want change it more and make a main page because already two individual season pages exist@PEPSI697 Sarthak Sai Mohapatra (talk) 07:54, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

pls 😭 i gave more time in it and I'm a learner now it demotivated me much so you revert your edit because i don't know how to revert an edit. Sarthak Sai Mohapatra (talk) 08:03, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I understand that you've only been on Wikipedia for a month and you're still learning and is trying to make constructive edits as I assume you're here for good faith. The reason why I've reverted your edits is because you've massively removed content from that article without explanation. For example, you've removed 30,097 bytes and removed 25,609 bytes without explanation and no edit summary. I'm happy to restore your revision if you explain to me the reasons why you've removed these contents. I understand this can be frustrating as a newcomer. I suggest that you make sure next time you've removed massive bits of content, you explain it in the edit summary so it's not confusing for others. To do an edit summary on mobile version of Wikipedia (which you are using), use the rectangle/horizontal box on the top of the preview and briefly describe your changes. For more information on edit summaries, see Help:Edit Summary. If you have any more questions, you can get assistance at the Teahouse. Anyways, hope you enjoy your time on Wikipedia and I hope you decide to stay and continue editing. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 11:32, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why you don't action against @Tenshi Uisu, he deleted the things i did and other. I wanted to make something creative but he made the simple and similar as season 2 page and it isn't looks like a main page without number of Contestants and overal information. I made a new table of all contestants with their winning stars but he also deleted that. I was trying to talk with him but he replied you're new you don't know anything. And i saw he have only thousands of editing that not many experienced. Pls look into the matter. 🙏 Sarthak Sai Mohapatra (talk) 04:01, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to take action on this user as this user is clearly editing in good faith and has done nothing wrong. I looked at Tenshi Uisu's talk page, I actually agree with this contributor, the season content belongs in the other article. You've also made personal attacks to that user as well calling them stupid, that is highly unacceptable on Wikipedia and we should never ever make any personal attacks, ever, see WP:NPA. If you make personal attacks again, an admin will block you indefinitely and I don't want that. I've also responded to you on your talk page stating some policies. I suggest you go on the article's talk page and tell the community what is the matter and see their opinion. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬) (📝) 07:12, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]