User talk:PierceCheng

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bonny Portmore has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bangelfire\.com\b' (link(s): http://www.angelfire.com/ca/immie/bonny.html) .

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 06:49, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PierceCheng, could you please explain why you are adding the link Accountability System to the articles of tennis professionals? You added it to the bio of Marion Bartoli ([1]) and to Émilie Loit ([2]). Accountability system is not an article on Wikipedia, and doesn't seem to bear any relevance at all to tennis professionals. Please stop adding these links. Thanks! Maedin\^talk 09:39, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• • I add the link Accountabiliy System because France cannot defend their championships are responsible for Marion Bartoli and Emilie Loit lost to Anastasia Myskina and Vera Zvonareva in the last decinding doubles match when they are tired 2-2 with Russia at 2004 FED Cup final (France VS Russia), as a result their team leader Guy Forget was resigned and then they didn't pick up by the new team leader Georges Goven for this event.--Pierce (talk) 10:05, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2008 Greek riots. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dr.K. logos 17:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NOTREPOSITORY and read WP:EL. I hope this helps. Thanks. Dr.K. logos 17:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me why you deleted my message please? This is the important message! See this: Hong Kong Security Bureau: Travel Advice for Iran --Pierce (talk) 12:09, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PierceCheng, I've reverted your addition to 2009 Iranian election protests for two reasons. First, that information is not of much consequence to anyone outside of Hong Kong. Second, it really has nothing to do with the topic of the article itself, which is dealing with Iran.

I've also undone your two most recent edits. Removing sourced materiel can be considered to be vandalism, and there's no explaination given either on the Talk page or in the edit summaries which explain those changes.

Also, you should sign your posts by using: ~~~~
— Ω (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Paralympic association football is already categorised under Category:Football (soccer) variants, so there is no need to categorise it under Category:Football (soccer) too. – PeeJay 10:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explaination, I will not make a war for edit again.--Pierce (talk) 10:53, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. ThemFromSpace 22:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ThemFromSpace 04:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I will stop it. But I want to ask question, if I want to add some useful links, can you tell me how should I do?--Pierce (talk) 14:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please only add c-class and above articles to the template. --Nate1481 10:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you advice.--Pierce (talk) 10:53, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do you honestly believe that links to the NPCs of participating countries are suitable external links for the main Paralympic Games article? There were 148 nations at the last Games and it is ridiculous to consider linking to all of their websites whilst linking to a select few is not only unnecessary but could appear biased. The same with articles on athlete interviews, what is so special about these? Both WP:NOTLINK and WP:ELNO (no. 13) could be applied here I think and additionally at least one of the links was dead. I'm not going to bother to revert your change but I'd ask that you take another look at the links you readded and perhaps remove some of them yourself. Cheers Basement12 (T.C) 19:34, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You wouldn't happen to have references for this edit, would you? ɳOCTURNEɳOIR _{talk // contribs} 22:57, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell me what's the problem of my edit please?--Pierce (talk) 04:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there was a problem, I would have undid your edit. I just want to add a reference to verify that date :D ɳOCTURNEɳOIR _{talk // contribs} 04:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop moving sports who's history and roots you don't understand on {{Team Sport}} as per the Shinty article

"Whilst comparisons are often made with field hockey, the two sports have several important differences. In shinty, a player is allowed to play the ball in the air and is allowed to use both sides of the stick. The stick may also be used to block and to tackle, although a player may not come down on an opponent's stick, a practice called hacking. A player may tackle using the body as long as this is shoulder-to-shoulder as in football.

The sport was derived from the same root as the Irish game of hurling but has developed different rules and features. These rules are governed by the Camanachd Association." 86.42.68.129 (talk) 16:17, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Tanya James (pornographic actress) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  
   Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/officialtanyajames (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com).
   If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tanya James (pornographic actress) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, per WP:PORNBIO

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tabercil (talk) 13:26, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted problem paragraph.--Pierce (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When do you intent to create these articles you keep adding to Template:Team Sport? Surely you could even create a stub if these are notable Gnevin (talk) 10:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished for three beach sports, you can see it first and then edit if you think this three articles have an imporvement.--Pierce (talk) 14:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK that's fine Gnevin (talk) 15:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted it because your quality of English is terrible. That passage needs completely rewriting. – PeeJay 15:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see, but you can't delete to deny someone to know which condition will referee stop and terminately the match early.--Pierce (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand you. Your English is terrible. – PeeJay 18:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PeeJay2K3, you could be a bit more diplomatic than that, perhaps?

Pierce, contributions to articles need to be clear and concise expressions of the English language. If I, or other editors, were to understand the gist of what you are trying to say in your contribution, we might have joined you and just copy edited it. Unfortunately your contribution appears unclear to more than one editor. You would benefit by finding someone with a good knowledge of the rules to point you in the right direction. I also am hampered by a lack of detailed knowledge of the game and its rules to know what is correct or not. Do understand that a consensus of editors may still find that your contribution, once clarified, is still not required in the article.

Also note that you moved an inline citation without explanation and appropriated it to your contribution. This is unhelpful and may have been disruptive. Note that edit summaries are for that purpose only - to summarise the purpose and content of an edit. They are not to be used to state a case or seek help of guidance. There are other places and methods to seek the help and guidance you require. The article talk page would be a good place to start. I also commend you understand how to edit an article - information about which can be found in Wikipedia help. Also, please don't edit war. Bleakcomb (talk) 01:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Regina Ice. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:14, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Regina Ice has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, negative biography of a living person. Please do not remove this tag without sourcing the article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 00:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User_talk:Altenmann#Name_dab_changes. - Altenmann >t 20:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Beach korfball, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beach korfball. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gnevin (talk) 12:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Beach tchoukball, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beach tchoukball. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Gnevin (talk) 12:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please don't add unreferenced opinions into wikipedia articles: they may be deleted at any time This is especially enforced in biographies of living persons, see the corresponding policy. - Altenmann >t 17:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but I will rewrite something for FED Cup 2004 final. Because I want let every tennis fans to know the truth.

Looks like all you did was wait two weeks and re-add your opinion with no references. Please learn Wikipedia policies. There are many-many pages of documentation about them, and if you are really concerned with the truth, you should have no problems following those policies. EAE (Holla!) 18:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have the document to prove why Guy Forget was resigned because Marion Bartoli and Emilie Loit lost the last rubber. 网球网 - 丢了冠军 福尔热想要放弃 (Simplified Chinese only)

Bryanne, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Bryanne and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Bryanne during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your undoing of my edit was misguided, and though I'm supposed to assume good faith, a look at your talk page and contribution history shows that you do not understand or follow several Wikipedia policies, so let me clarify why I made my edit, and my objections to your undoing of it. As per Wikipedia's manual of style for disambiguation pages, there should be no period at the end of the line, and there should be at most one wikilink per line. In addition, the fact that Evgeny Korolev was once a compatriot of Evgeniy Kafelnikov is worthless information for disambiguating them; it only serves to confuse. And lastly, you marked your edit as minor, as you appear to mark ALL your edits as minor. In fact, as Help:Minor edit instructs us, very few if any of your edits actually qualify as minor. EAE (Holla!) 18:17, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please submit your submission to WP:AFC. —I-20the highway 15:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission has been declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/proposed name of disambiguation page was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to resubmit once the issues have been addressed. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —I-20the highway 15:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing my mistake. —I-20the highway 18:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Your revert in Caroline was probably based on not noticing that there is no page for Caroline Dhenin in wikipedia. MOS:DAB is very clear on requiring a "blue link" in each line. WP:WTAF is a good source to the reason why. Am I missing something? Were you planning on creating that page? --Muhandes (talk) 11:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see the same issue with Regina, Huber, Andrea, Tanya (name), Jessica (given name). Please peruse WP:N, MOS:DAB and specifically MOS:DABRL, WP:WTAF. These are all very clear guidelines. --Muhandes (talk) 11:36, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed you moved the article to X (politic). First, it's "politician", and second, it doesn't make much sense moving the article to a more specific name and leaving the old general one as a redirect. I think the move should be done once an article about the tennis player is written, so we can create a disambiguation page where the old article was. --Illythr (talk) 00:27, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also here to talk about your page moves. Please don't move pages just because a tennis player has the same name. The only time we should move an article is if another article has an equal or greater claim to the name. Even winning a single title in tennis does not necessarily make that person more prominent than a career politician, for example.   Will Beback  talk  21:21, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Sania Mirza, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bill william compton^Talk 18:32, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your addition a second time on Caroline Wozniacki. There were two problems. First, that information needs to be verified by a reliable source. More importantly, though, Wikipedia strives to provide an encyclopedic summary of subjects. For a sports star, that means that we should not list every single tournament she ever played--only the most notable/important. As such, I don't believe that tournament belongs in the article. If you think I'm wrong, the next step is for you to go to the article's talk page and discuss it there. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PierceCheng. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. You are pushing hard to promote this non-notable tennis tournament. Whether you're a fan, or you're involved with it, I really don't know. But either way, the manner you're going about it is little more than spam. Courcelles 14:09, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• You've been told to stop this many times. See both the sections above this, and then I found this addition. You're spamming, you're making this tournament look like some important deal, when it actually barely matters at all. Courcelles 14:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PierceCheng. You have new messages at Bill william compton's talk page.
Message added 14:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hello, PierceCheng. You have new messages at Favonian's talk page.
Message added 10:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Favonian (talk) 10:08, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert Morrow may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[http://www.cwgc.org/find-war-dead/casualty/454819/ CWGC: Robert Morrow]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zana (pornographic actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zana (pornographic actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanya James is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanya James (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – S. Rich (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw you had asked a question about bandy at Talk:Bandy#Question for give up. I don't really know what it is you want to know, but if you refrase the question, perhaps I can answer. Bandy boy (talk) 11:15, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JMHamo (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PierceCheng. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]