User talk:~delta

Welcome to my talk page.

• If you send me a message here, I will reply here on my talk page. If I leave a message on your talk page, please reply to me there.
• Always sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~).
• Please assume good faith, be civil, refrain from canvassing and follow other Wikimedia policies.
• As for contentious topics, please assume that I am aware of all of them.
• I'd prefer to keep this talk page only for local English Wikipedia issues - if you want to leave me a message regarding something related to another project, please do it on my talk page on that project.
• Sometimes, this page may be semiprotected due to vandalism; if it is (and you are not registered or not autoconfirmed) and you need to leave me a message, feel free to do it at User talk:~delta/Non-protected talk page.
• Prefer to contact me privately? If so, please email me using the page linked here. I am also on the Wikimedia Discord server under the username prodraxis.

This talk page is archived. To browse the archives, press "Show" and select the month of posts you want to view. 2023 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2025 — Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Hey, how do i create new article? --HussainJalbani (talk) 07:37, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! Creating a new article from scratch is extremely challenging, and new editors are strongly recommended to spend a few months learning how Wikipedia works, by making improvements to some of our existing seven million articles before trying it. When you do decide to have a go at a new article, you are highly encouraged to read Help:Your first article. If you haven't already also check out the tutorial; it's a lot of fun! Happy editing! HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:06, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, nice to emeet you. Help me guide and include me in your community. Thank you in anticipation. --BrandPipal (talk) 15:41, 27 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The third round of the 2025 WikiCup ended on 28 June. This round was again competitive, with three contestants scoring more than 1,000 round points:

• BeanieFan11 (submissions) with 1,314 round points, mostly from articles about athletes and politicians, including 20 good articles and 48 did you know articles
• Gog the Mild (submissions) with 1,197 round points, mostly from military history articles, including 9 featured topic articles, two featured articles, and four good articles
• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 1,055 round points, mostly from television station articles, including 27 good articles and 9 good topic articles

Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn. This table shows all competitors who have received tournament points so far, while the full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 4 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 1 featured picture, 9 featured-topic articles, 149 good articles, 27 good-topic articles, and more than 90 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 18 In the News articles, and they have conducted more than 200 reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:50, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guild of Copy Editors June 2025 Newsletter Hello and welcome to the June 2025 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Hall of Fame: Congratulations to Dhtwiki for their well-deserved addition to the Hall of Fame last month, and thanks to GoldRomean for the nomination. Election news: Voting in the mid-year coordinator election ends at 23:59 on 30 June. Results will be announced at the election page. April Blitz: 14 of the 25 editors who signed up for the April 2025 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited 92,769 words in 30 articles. Barnstars awarded are available here. May Drive: 31 of the 54 editors who signed up for the May 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive copy edited 384,392 words in 216 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. June Blitz: 10 of the 12 editors who signed up for the June 2025 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited 26,652 words in 13 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. July Drive: Our July 2025 Backlog Elimination Drive will begin on 1 July and finish on 31 July. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 02:30, 30 June 2025 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 148 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,270 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:19, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! This is interesting. I edited a page for the first time a moment ago and my change was understandably reverted, though I think mistakenly.So I made a login to see how all this works on Wikipedia, for once.

I guess my first question is how to substantiate my edits. What makes something stick? In this case it was the diameter of a specific type of half dollar coin that I happen to have and measured as significantly different than what's listed on the page for it. But I'm curious about the process more generally too. --ArgonForge (talk) 01:27, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ArgonForge: nice username! Thing number one is to ensure that your changes are cited to a reliable source. In your example, that is actually prohibited by our policy against original research—we can't measure things in the real world; we rely on preexisting published sources instead. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! That does make sense, now that I think of it that way. I will have to be more careful going forward. ArgonForge (talk) 03:39, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am a new contributor is there a page where I can learn more of what to do and what not do? --Savagenerd (talk) 00:17, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Savagenerd: Help:Getting started contains some great tips :) HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:08, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! I reloaded a Wikipedia page for consideration that seems to meet all of the key points for an Academic page and included references. However, I just got a note that the Wikipedia person recommended it for speedy deletion. I'm really confused and frustrated with this process. Can you review the page and give me feedback where the issues are? --HeroCunucu (talk) 17:48, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@HeroCunucu: you can see the criteria for academics article inclusion—reviewing that, are you confident that the article will qualify? Once you are sure the page qualifies, it is really hard to review it because of the its format—not your fault, because Wikipedia formatting is challenging! Paragraph breaks are essential for reading comprehension and sources should be cited according to our guide to citing sources, which create our famous clickable blue numbers.^[1] Because this is a longer article, sections sections would help a lot. Let us know if you have any other questions; often the Teahouse can lead to a faster response. Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 00:15, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]