User talk:Pyrotec



Good article reassessment for Strensham services

[edit]

Strensham services has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:12, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for University of Valle

[edit]

University of Valle has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Isle of Arran

[edit]

Isle of Arran has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 18:43, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Diving cylinder

[edit]

Diving cylinder has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:03, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gillham-Electric

[edit]

Template:Gillham-Electric has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:40, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]