User talk:Redacted II

Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 1 section is present.

Please stick to the first half of the Hierarchy of Disagreement. See WP:PA for additional information.

	The Downlink	The WikiProject Spaceflight Newsletter
		2025 1 — 30 April

Volume 3 — Issue 4
Spaceflight Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Open tasks • Popular pages • The Downlink
In the News On 1 April, Fram2 became the first crewed mission to enter into a retrograde orbit around Earth's poles.
Article of the month Apollo Abort Guidance System The Apollo Abort Guidance System (AGS, also known as Abort Guidance Section) was a backup computer system providing an abort capability in the event of failure of the Lunar Module's primary guidance system (Apollo PGNCS) during descent, ascent or rendezvous. As an abort system, it did not support guidance for a lunar landing. The AGS was designed by TRW independently of the development of the Apollo Guidance Computer and PGNCS. It was the first navigation system to use a strapdown Inertial Measurement Unit rather than a gimbaled gyrostabilized IMU (as used by PGNCS). Although not as accurate as the gimbaled IMU, it provided satisfactory accuracy with the help of the optical telescope and rendezvous radar. It was also lighter and smaller in size.	Image of the month Falcon 9 Full Thrust Starting development in 2014, the Falcon 9 Full Thrust is a variant of the Falcon 9 that is the first orbital rocket to have a first stage successfully land vertically after launch. The stage shown here is from the April 2016 SpaceX CRS-8 mission, after landing on the autonomous spaceport drone ship Of Course I Still Love You.
Members New Members: Willbill6272 (14 April) Elleh3113 (16 April) Number of active members: 208. Total number of members: 433. April Launches All times stated here are in UTC. See a current list: here. Falcon 9 Block 5 — Fram2 (1 Apr. at 00:46 UTC) (success) Long March 2F/G — Shenzhou 20 (24 Apr. at 09:17 UTC) (success) Atlas V 551 — 27 KuiperSats (28 Apr. at 23:01) (success) Firefly Alpha — LM-400 Demo (29 Apr. at 13:37) (launch failure)	Article Statistics This data reflects values from 30 April 2025. Spaceflight articles by quality and importance Quality Importance Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total FA 7 28 15 8 58 FL 3 4 4 11 FM 123 123 A 1 2 2 5 GA 11 27 33 55 1 127 B 15 84 200 221 1 521 C 45 162 581 774 31 1,593 Start 16 144 1,017 2,584 444 4,205 Stub 9 204 2,049 244 2,506 List 10 120 108 236 1 30 505 Category 1,264 1,264 Disambig 47 47 File 223 223 Portal 55 55 Project 109 109 Redirect 2 42 131 1,243 1,418 Template 528 528 NA 1 1 Other 29 29 Assessed 105 579 2,206 6,064 3,623 751 13,328 Unassessed 14 125 139 Total 105 579 2,206 6,078 3,623 876 13,467 Monthly Changes Since March 2025, four new high-importance, two new mid-importance, twenty new low-importance, and two new NA-importance articles have been created. Four unknown-importance articles have been removed, for a total of 24 new articles. One article has been promoted to Featured Article status. There are also five more B-class articles, eighteen more C-class articles, eleven more Start-class articles, six fewer Stub-class articles, and six more lists. Special thanks to Neopeius for significantly working on some of the Timeline of spaceflight articles (specifically 1953, 54, 55, and most recently 56). Thanks also to Sotakarhu for table work in the latter.
Discuss & propose changes to The Downlink at The Downlink talk page. To unsubscribe from the newsletter remove your name from the Mailing list. Newsletter contributors: Ships&Space

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:26, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Redacted, your repeated closure of discussions at Talk:Space sunshade#Second merge proposal are not appropriate. Have a look here for how discussions should be closed Wikipedia:Closing discussions. Please stop doing it or I will have to report you. Thanks! {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 17:15, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Closing discussions#Challenging other closures Redacted II (talk) 17:22, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Also, your repeated unclosure is borderline edit warring) Redacted II (talk) 17:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redacted you are pretty wrong on this.

1. I did not reopen the discussion. I wrote underneath it that it should be reopened and at least another user agrees.
2. the closing editor himself has acknowledged that he shouldn't have closed it as an involved editor ( @Chidgk1 do you agree?)
3. you are edit warring by inappropriately closing my discussion multiple times despite my message here

I will ask you to self revert your third inappropriate closure of my discussion or I will be forced to report you for disruptive editing. I hope you can stop this unnecessary behaviour and let the discussion play out as other editors have asked you to do. {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 17:34, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When did I close it after it?

If I accidentally did that as part of readding the auotarchive I'll go fix that. Redacted II (talk) 17:36, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere in my last edit to that page did I reclose that: [1] for the diff.

I've only closed it twice: [2], [3], both of which were before you sent a message here. Redacted II (talk) 17:40, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. You are right of course. I misread the diff of your revert. See you on the talk page! {{u|Gtoffoletto}}  ^talk 17:42, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]