User talk:Sgerbic

Archives

2010: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2011: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2012: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2024: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2025: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

This page has archives. Sections older than 61 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgerbic (talk • contribs) 15:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, there are accusations that you are the leader of a 200+ member anti-UFO cabal on a somewhat viral Twitter post. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 03:25, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. No matter what I say, they won't believe anything that does not fit in with their conclusion. Sgerbic (talk) 03:46, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sgerbic. You invited me to reach out to your talk page if I had more questions regarding my AJ Parr article, which, as you kindly pointed out has a lot of issues. You also said that "unless you are holding onto some wild card amazing set of citations in your back pocket, if this came up for AfD I would vote delete." Based on what you said, I was thinking that if in short term I do not find more references or ways to improve the article with better sourcing, instead of deleting it, I could try moving the article back to the sandbox for further practice and improvement, do you think that could work? UncleAlb (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should always start in your sandbox and then only after having extra eyes on it, make it live. I'm not sure how you would unalive it without it going to a deletion. Maybe ask whoever it was that was offering advice in that other thread. But yes, always start in your sandbox. But as I said, unless you have something that I'm missing you want to add to prove notability, then that article is going to be up for deletion. And if so, just let that happen, what good is it in your sandbox if you have nothing to fix it? Sgerbic (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank H. H. Roberts, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Research Council and Carnegie Foundation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]