User talk:Udar55

hey

I would like to thank you yet again for improving my Chase Sherman and Hayder Hassan article and I was wondering if you could quickly check through the Shane Burgos article I just made. Thanks loads. Rickyc123 (talk) 14:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Rickyc123[reply]

I would like to thank you for heavily improving the Hayder Hassan article and I was wondering if you would be able to check the Chase Sherman article I made. Rickyc123 (talk) 13:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Rickyc123[reply]

I'm not gonna bother anymore.Not the worth —Preceding unsigned comment added by Outerdrake (talk • contribs) 17:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just like the kimbo dispute below, you keep making up this fake pro exhibition records that don't exist! Its an oxymoron to create a record for an exhibition match for the very purpose of a exhibition is to not be included in any record.These tallies should only categorize for anything pro combat sports.That's why they are no amateur tally records.The exhibition match is already mentioned under "mixed Martial arts career".It is NOT a pro mma record.PERIOD

notice here their is no mention of the exhibition bout.http://www.sherdog.com/fighter/Ray-Mercer-22389

UpDATE: That's because you put that in kimbo's page,that doesn't mean wikipedia thought you were right.Kimbo's page is now locked.

The person below stated such.You thought the mercer fight should have been in kimbo's pro record and then you decided to make that phony record.

Even in mercer's discussion page, someone else complain about that phony exhibition record.So i'm not alone in this.If you want to put mercer's k1 record that's fine.but don't put something that's not sanction under professional combat sport record.

ps:you coded the last edit wrong, your vandalizing his page to the public. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Outerdrake (talk • contribs) 04:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I removed the win you added to his pro MMA record because the fight was an exhibition. If you visit his talk page you will see links provided stating such. Thesaddestday 21:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, looks like I was a little quick on the draw there. I hadn't seen the new reports actually confirming matches for the event and confirming that those matches were for "UFC Fight Night 13". We've been having problems lately with UFC 83 & 84 (where everyone keeps fighting about where the event is and which set of fights might actually be the right ones for which event), so I've been keeping a close eye out for this article. Looks like there might actually be enough information to keep it by now. Gromlakh (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article EliteXC: Street Certified, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 03:29, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied at Talk:EliteXC: Street Certified. From a quick skim of articles relating to EliteXC, few of them cite any reliable sources which demonstrate the sport's notability in the context of including it in an encyclopedia. The sport as a whole appears to be notable, but I don't see why the individual matches are. --Nick Dowling (talk) 05:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be better to place those references in the article rather than on my talk page. I still don't see how this event is notable when most individual sporting matches aren't notable (for instance, individual matches in major football leagues which are also generally very high rating TV shows). --Nick Dowling (talk) 22:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest that you review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. I don't think that Wikipedia is or should be an unofficial results database for this or any other sport. If you're not happy with the offical websites, then start a Geocities page or something. --Nick Dowling (talk) 00:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On it! Gromlakh (talk) 01:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beefed up the article, added several references, etc. It's on my watchlist now, so I'll help keep an eye on it. Hope that helps! Gromlakh (talk) 02:55, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Affliction: Banned, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Affliction: Banned and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 04:40, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't actually seen the film in question, but the article was unclear about its factuality. The editor that added that to the article originally was on an agenda-driven crusade so I wasn't prepared to accept his word for anything, but if you're sure the film is a reliable source then I'm entirely happy to accept it. Orpheus (talk) 23:00, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An extra source - brilliant! (edit: and bloody interesting, incidentally.) Not necessary from my point of view, but let's face it - more sources are never a bad thing. If you wouldn't mind adding it to the article (if you haven't already), that would be extra spiffy. Thanks for correcting the article. Orpheus (talk) 23:12, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add the professional MMA organization template to Affliction: Banned? It seems that none of the other events have this template at the bottom and it should probably be sufficient that it is on the Affliction Entertainment article. Is there any reason I shouldn't remove it from Affliction: Banned? --jhanCRUSH 08:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor that expressed concerns before now completely ignores the sources and wants to say which sources are valid and which isn't. This in no way helps with the wiki article. Please have a say here:Talk:Strikeforce Sea888 (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to ShoMMA, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drr-darkomen (talk) 22:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Tvnationvol1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:21, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:StrikeforceMiami.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

• If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce at E3 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Violation of WP:CRYSTAL. Not officially announced by the organization, and the only reference qualifies as a rumour mill.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 14:49, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cole Province, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cole Province. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. jmcw (talk) 10:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted the page to be consistent with ShoXC, take a look at ShoXC, it's easier to read now.Sportslogo (talk) 16:43, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem. This joker has now made a request for meditation. I have included you in it. Here is the notification:

(Justinsane15 (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Udar55, I've put up a request to change something on the ShoMMA article in its talk page. Since you seem to be the champion of this article, I'd like your input as to what you think. Dachknanddarice (T‖C) 21:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got your message and had a chance to look at your addition to the Strikeforce challengers page. It looks good but I would add one thing. Be sure to add the chronological order in the inbox like the ufc articles do. Otherwise i think it looks great.Dachknanddarice (talk) 22:34, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea to add a chart... I'll try and get to some of these so that you don't have to do all the work but since I do most of my editing offline here at my job, I don't tend to get a ton of time to do these things very quickly. It might be best if you work from Strikeforce Challengers 2 and work your way up and I'll start at Strikeforce Challengers 15 and work my way down and we'll meet in the middle somewhere. What do you suggest? Dachknanddarice (T‖C) 01:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to ShoMMA was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.

Thank you, AGK 23:46, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Request for mediation concerning ShoMMA, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. An explanation of why it has not been possible to allow this dispute to proceed to mediation is provided at the mediation request page (which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time). Queries on the rejection of this dispute can be directed to the Committee chairperson or e-mailed to the mediation mailing list.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK 00:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.)

I have nominated Jimi Manuwa, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimi Manuwa. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Paralympiakos (talk) 17:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any reasonable cause, why you removed most of the references?Nilgsson (talk) 17:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being so open-minded with the suggestions on the ShoMMA article. I read and commented on your request on the WP:MMA talk page and want to offer any help you might need in adding those articles and making sure they link up with major Strikeforce events. We should give LOL and the others another day or so to make up their minds just so we can have concensus however. Thanks again, and let me know if I can be of any help. Dachknanddarice (T‖C) 16:44, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Er, well, actually it's because you were adding those articles that I created it. I saw that the redlink needed filling. :-) Please do fill it out some - the Italian Wikipedia isn't very informative, I'm afraid.

Excellent articles - keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 20:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Before we get into an editing war, Dream's official page is calling the event Fight for Japan or more specifically FIGHT FOR JAPAN DREAM JAPAN GP- 2011 (http://www.dreamofficial.com/free/news/detail.php?id=1302851145). I'm not sure where you are getting DREAM Japan GP - 2011 Bantamweight Japan Tournament‎ from(?)(Justinsane15 (talk) 00:56, 16 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Ok I saw the talk page now, although nightmareofbattle is a blog, I guess we can leave it since the more reliable sources I like to use seem to be conflicting at this time.(Justinsane15 (talk) 01:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I agree DREAM.17 seems to work best and seems to be the most logical name as well.(Justinsane15 (talk) 04:38, 23 April 2011 (UTC))[reply]

What source says that she only pulled out because of the advice of her doctor? Every article I have read on the subject says that she failed her medicals and the doctors would not clear her to fight. 74.65.191.70 (talk) 19:43, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read the Yahoo source I linked to. It clearly states that she did not get medical clearance from her own doctors. Udar55 (talk) 22:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your help, as you can tell, I am new at this wiki editing thing (a member since one week ago!). I will follow your advice. Thanks. Btw... FEDOR VIA SUBMISSION ARM BAR 1ST ROUND!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AaronBok (talk • contribs) 01:24, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The MMA Barnstar
		I, Buddy23Lee, hereby award Udar55 the The MMA Barnstar for their valued contributions to WikiProject MMA. Awarded July 25th, 2011

You're a prolific contributor to Wikipedia's MMA projects who's well overdue for one of these. Thanks for your additions to the Bill "The Grill" Cooper article! :) Buddy23Lee (talk) 21:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article ProElite: Arlovski vs. Lopez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOT#DIR, WP:NOT#NEWS - Wikipedia is not a directory of sporting events. No independent sources anyway.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Udar55! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:43, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey, I just saw that you changed my reference edit for chris leben drug test. Are you saying that mmamania.com is not a reliable source? Because many of those articles come from other sources. (AaronBok (talk))

Thanks for your message. "the format has long been established and followed" is not a valid reason to reject a constructive update with unbiased content and no malicious intent. However, since you are the second person to do undo my contribution, I have initiated a discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts to create a formatted template for fight card results. The version with more information should stand until differences of opinion on presentation are resolved. Therefore, if we do not hear a valid reason to discard the tabular format, I will start restoring the contribution. Thanks. 58.104.6.200 (talk) 07:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Carlo Prater, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page WEC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MMA Fight Pit: Genesis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMA Fight Pit: Genesis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 15:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you have the MMA Wikiproject on your watchlist. A discussion was started there yesterday about the naming scheme for UFC event articles. Your thoughts and input would be welcome. --TreyGeek (talk) 18:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Udar55, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Road to Hell (film), appears to be directly copied from http://www.cinema-suicide.com/2008/08/05/albert-pyun-presents-streets-of-fire-2/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Road to Hell (film) if necessary. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from UFC on Fuel TV: Sanchez vs. Ellenberger. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 12:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Valentin Trujillo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atotonilco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Shawn Jordan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page America (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Strikeforce: Tate vs. Rousey, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 18:55, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shark Fights 18 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this MMA event is notable, only sourced to routine coverage of the fight card.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 23:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shark Fights 18 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shark Fights 18 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking ^(edits) 20:31, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert this edit or I will report you to WP:3RR/N, as an aside the edit sum is provocative as you are fully aware admins have asked us to redirect to the Omnibus rather than take to AfD. Mtking ^(edits) 20:04, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Mtking ^(edits) 22:02, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Udar55. Thank you. Mtking ^(edits) 00:35, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am a mediator/clerk at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. It has been asserted in this edit that you no longer wish to pursue the dispute which you listed at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. If you do not wish that listing to be closed, please so indicate there (not here) within 24 hours (i.e. by April 3, 2012, 13:30 UTC). I will place it on hold until then. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) | DR goes to Wikimania! 13:27, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your objections to treating the UFC events the same way as the Bellator Fighting Championships seem to me as one more born out of causing disruption to WP to make a point than a wish to improve the coverage of UFC. Mtking ^(edits) 02:22, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given the close of yet another UFC event AfD as a redirect (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 149 (2nd nomination)) and given the closing admin comments that in relation to the keep !votes "there are very few (if any) that have a valid, policy-based rationale.", and the fact you have not made any comments at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/MMA notability regarding why the stand alone articles should remain (other than your desire for process), you position is becoming untenable. Mtking ^(edits) 01:03, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dangeroustonight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Bellator Fighting Championships: Season Six, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Sparks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EliteXC: Showdown is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EliteXC: Showdown until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking ^(edits) 11:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Larkin vs. Rossborough has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 21:21, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Fodor vs. Terry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, all but one is either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 21:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Damm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 21:24, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Healy vs. Beerbohm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the single source is not independent.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 21:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Woodley vs. Saffiedine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 21:26, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Challengers411.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 00:50, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Bowling vs. Voelker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 01:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Ribeiro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 01:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Riggs vs. Taylor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 01:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 01:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Lindland vs. Casey has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 01:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Johnson vs. Mahe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 01:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Kaufman vs. Hashi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT and WP:MMAEVENT, there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 01:11, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The Todd Killings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ne'er-do-well (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: Bowling vs. Voelker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: Bowling vs. Voelker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking ^(edits) 20:59, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well put. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:34, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Udar55 I apologize for including you in the Sock-puppet investigation. I was using my iPad and it looked like you had only made contributions to that discussion and were a days old account. Once the Check-user was declined, I removed you and two others who were obviously not new accounts. You can see the Diff from when I opened the SPI and when the Check user was declined here.

I'm certainly not trying to fight anyone who wants to voice their opinion about a deletion, my main concern was the previous sock-puppetry on MMA AfD's and the obvious WP:CANVASSING and WP:MEAT issues on that and other AfD's.

If you or anyone else wants to explain What makes one of those fights significant that I can add to the article and cite from a non MMA only source, I will gladly do so. Seriously, Just point me in the right direction and I'll do the hard work. Other than that , I and others just feel the MMA events that are not "game changers" and cannot be described with any prose or demonstration of lasting significance, belong on the omnibus for the year. No one is trying to wipe MMA off Wikipedia.

Again, sorry, and I'm glad you removed the user message about the SPI before I got a chance to. I will probably cross post this on other users pages, but I don't mean it any less, I just don't have time to be this thorough on every page today, and I want to apologize sooner than later. Again, it was an honest mistake out of concern, I apologize. Newmanoconnor (talk) 20:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, I'm not on an MMA vendetta or anything against you. Please see the NI and my talk page for more info. I'm sorry I've frustrated you so much. It is not personal at all.

I do have a question, Would you be interested in helping to keep the Omnibus(s) updated if the guidelines Dennis has come up with so far are decided upon?The notability discussion seems to have digressed into more attacks and defensiveness and alot of well we're not going to contribute anything anymore. You seem very passionate about MMA, but you also seem passionate about film and I really would value your input. I'm sorry I've frustrated you, I may have someone close the AfD's per nom request once I get a response from another editor who interjected some advice and questions today.Newmanoconnor (talk) 18:37, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Kaitlin Young, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kansas City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I wanted to say thank you for keeping a positive tone at the ANI. By assuming good faith of the AFD nominator, you made it possible for me to come in and defuse the situation rapidly, and helped make him a part of the solution. I would gladly buy you a beer if you were nearby. This is exactly the type of attitude I hope to foster at the MMA discussions, and your contributions are certainly appreciated. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 23:09, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Running Man Barnstar
		I second that emotion? I was impressed anyway. I'm glad you started the ANI, I like this outcome better. Newmanoconnor (talk) 23:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So correct me if I'm wrong here, i know you have more knowledge about this than I do, Strike force was purchased by UFC?

But it is still a stand alone promotional org?

If yes to both, I think that we should get your deleted content back and build a Strikeforce Omnibus, unless you don't want to.Newmanoconnor (talk) 23:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Evangelista vs. Aina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources that lack diversity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 07:38, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Villasenor vs. Cyborg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, and are from a single MMA centric websource

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 07:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Strikeforce Challengers: Kennedy vs. Cummings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets, they are either not independent or from MMA centric websources

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 07:40, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Man if you and the ther constructive editors that want all stand alone articles don't help us, The Omnibus will never get changed to include the detail you want, and more single articles will get deleted at AfD. The whole process has now been derailed by some jerk,Dennis Brown has quit, All the Admins are ignoring the area. Newmanoconnor (talk) 18:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you re-added the paragraph I removed from UFC 146, concerning Overeem's appeals process. Can you explain why you feel this information is relevant to this event? His positive test and subsequent removal is certainly relevant, as it drastically altered the card. But his appeal took place AFTER he was no longer a part of the show. The results of this appeal had no ramifications for the card, only for Overeem's own fight licence (that is, if he had succesfully appealed, dos Santos would still fight Mir and Overeem would still sit this one out).

I thank you for leaving (and re-adding) some of the other changes I had made, instead of just reverting. I hope we can come to an understanding on this issue. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I've had my own experiences with the omnibus crew, and I can understand how their type of tenacious "diplomacy" can wear an editor into a compromise that may not be best for Wikipedia. I'll reluctantly accept throwing them a bone for now, but will revisit the article after the show's in the books, when we have actual occurences we can all (hopefully) agree establish notability on their own. Maybe we'll get lucky, and one of the "cabal" will decide to actually watch this show and finally realize it's not at all similar to a hockey game. Should be a good one! Go Junior! InedibleHulk (talk) 22:16, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And now I see User:Mtking considers this entire section "undue weight". So much for appeasing him, I guess. If you'd like to reconsider removing the appeal paragraph in light of this, let me know (or remove it yourself). InedibleHulk (talk) 22:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I reverted it. Yes, your movie analogy makes sense. Unfortunately, a lot of common sense seems to fail WP:SOMETHINGORANOTHER in this flame war/debate. Your first round TKO prediction also makes perfect sense. I think it would be safe to add it to the results section already, but that MIGHT cause some concern ;) Good to meet you, too. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:17, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Ribeiro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: Wilcox vs. Ribeiro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking ^(edits) 02:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: del Rosario vs. Mahe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking ^(edits) 02:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: Lindland vs. Casey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: Lindland vs. Casey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking ^(edits) 02:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article ONE Fighting Championship: Champion vs. Champion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This sports event fails WP:NOTNEWSPAPER policy along with WP:EVENT and WP:SPORTSEVENT , there is no attempt in the actual article to demonstrate any lasting significance, the sources are from either before or immediately post the event and are just of the routine coverage type any sports event gets.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mtking ^(edits) 23:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Something Weird Video, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardcore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:33, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yep... Cormier vs. Mir will not be for the title. http://sports.yahoo.com/news/sources-daniel-cormier-frank-mir-tabbed-fall-strikeforce-040600508--mma.html JonnyBonesJones (talk) 11:24, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!

Kevlar (talk) 01:29, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to our new members who joined in August! ChrisGualtieri, LlamaAl, Paul "The Wall", Ruslan90, SiMntjMMA, Udar55, and Zwarrior2. Posting this to your talk pages and PW:MMA Talk page. Kevlar (talk) 06:08, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Strikeforce Challengers: Kennedy vs. Cummings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strikeforce Challengers: Kennedy vs. Cummings until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mtking ^(edits) 07:20, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about changing the name to the other Aurelio, Sherdog had the old Pride fighter linked on their Bellator page, so I got mixed up.Luchuslu (talk) 15:51, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to UFC 154, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Mtking ^(edits) 20:38, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Elen of the Roads (talk) 03:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)