Strange as it no doubt seems, but it would appear that 86.148.159.102 (talk·contribs)'s edit to Irn-Bru (here), in which he adds that one of the brand's slogans was "Cheer up Goth. Have an Irn Bru", is infact correct, per this BBC News story (a picture of the ad is here). I believe they also ran TV ads at the same time which showed a group of stereotypical goths doing uncharacteristically cheery things like riding on roller coasters. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk13:47, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AAARRRGGGHHH!!! It seems two of us reverted simultaneously - the edit previous to mine hadn't appeared when I told it to revert! Sorry. - Voxpuppet01:58, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, You just vandalized my work on the Freddie Mercury site. Your offense: Carelessly erasing my attempts to improve the citations. As I had already made about 10 edits upon seeing this, I cannot fix the situation by simply reverting the article. I expect you to fix your mistake. 138.67.44.17504:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. I realize that you reverted it again in a responsible way. You have to understand that I recently had some issues with a moron user named Trusilver who wasted huge amounts of my time. Maybe you know him?138.67.44.17504:22, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hope you don't mind, but I reverted your removal of a submission at WP:AFC. The submission wasn't done correctly, but it still had no objectionable content, and so I simply closed it as a non-notable bio submission. Hope that's okay! Ariel♥Gold15:25, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely an article like that would have {{db-bio}} on it, but at AfC, they aren't removed, they are just closed as non notable. Rarely are submissions entirely removed. Attacks inside a submission is removed, then it is closed stating "Attack removed". Blank submissions are closed as blank, copyvio issues are removed, then closed as cv, etc. And I hope you're not offended if you know all this already. Ariel♥Gold15:32, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that is a humorous add-on you can install into Firefox, to get it to display a bunch of wild, kooky names instead of "Firefox". Purely entertainment but still funny, lol. Ariel♥Gold15:47, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please, do not revert vandalism without warning the editor that you reverted. Reverting vandalism is not as important as letting the editor know why you reverted. — Moeε16:34, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong Keep He is Well Known Sufi of India's Amrohatown in Western U.P. Shrine is famous for the Scorpions which don't sting any One despite their nature to bite in the Shrine Premises. The name was also given by him to Amroha town.Millions of People have seen this Unbeleivable act. Also he must be on WIKIpedia bcoz he is well known fmous Sufi of India who has net Presene also. Article may be Improved but need not Deleted.Shabiha 23:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
If this was just an error, consider slowing down on tagging. If not an error, please better familiarize yourself with WP:CSD#A7, which requires a mere assertion of importance. While there are articles that fall into a grey area as to whether they have asserted importance, this article is not even close.--Fuhghettaboutit13:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'd be really sad if it was closed down. If someone was willing to identify some priorities for the project, then I would work on them in spare moments. I'm going to be editing really sporadically in the next couple of months though. And my problem with this project has always been knowing where exactly to start. Thanks for your concern and involvement. Itsmejudith22:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Richard; I concur. With a bit of luck, having completed the Crawley rewrite that has taken me quite a while, I will have more opportunities to concentrate on B&H articles in the near future (including the churches, of course!). We definitely need more focus, anyway. A good place to start would be trying to improve the core article itself from its current "Start" class towards Good Article and eventually Featured-article status. As I did with Crawley, I'm willing to create a user subpage with an indicative structure based on the guidelines within WP:UKCITIES. Anyway, on the original question ... yes, we should try to reinvigorate and expand the scope of the project. Cheers, Hassocks548911:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please expand your nomination on the current AfD, not start a new one. You can always make a further comment down the page adding extra reasoning. Starting a new nomination suggests that you want to hide the keep comments that the page has already got. If you still wish this page to be nominated, please revert your closeq. Ryan Postlethwaite13:13, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I failed to consider or note User:J Milburn personal religious beliefs when I made my post. I have appreciated the help that he has given me in the past and was simply replying to his notice of his birthday; nothing more than that was intended. I regret if my reply offended anyone. Dbiel(Talk)00:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've declined speedy on the above - per Wikipedia:CSD, schools are not automatically speediable under A7. Feel free to prod it or take it to AfD. Thanks. GBT/C20:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:30, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[