Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics

WikiProject Comics v t e
Home	Assessments	Cleanup	Discussion	Improvements	Notice board	Help	Popular pages	Workgroups
Article alerts · Copyright · Getting Involved · Manual of Style · Naming conventions · Recognized content · References · Statistics · Templates · Userbox

This WikiProject was featured on the WikiProject report at the Signpost on 27 June 2011

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by when more than 10 sections are present.

WikiProject Comics was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 27 June 2011.

Requested move at Talk:Spider-Man: Brand New Day#Requested move 1 April 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Spider-Man: Brand New Day#Requested move 1 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:55, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Peter Parker (Sam Raimi film series)#Requested move 4 April 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Peter Parker (Sam Raimi film series)#Requested move 4 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 12:51, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Spider-Man: One More Day#Requested move 11 April 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Spider-Man: One More Day#Requested move 11 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Minor tie-in comics

Usually, crossover events have small miniseries of a handful of issues about a given character, focused on the event. If not notable for a standalone article, should those redirect to the article about the character (or, if avalable, the article about the comic books of said character) or the article about the event? For example, Doctor Strange of Asgard, should it redirect to Doctor Strange (comic book) or to One World Under Doom? Cambalachero (talk) 01:39, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whichever covers it more in depth. I would reckon that DSofA would be a more major factor in the One World series with its fairly small number of issues than in the tale of a character that has appeared in hundreds of comics. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 02:23, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation#Requested move 10 April 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Christopher and Dana Reeve Foundation#Requested move 10 April 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 16:19, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Large scale copyright investigation

An IP editor added a large amount of copyrighted text to various comics releated articles so their edits to over 360 articles dating back to July 2011 are being reviewed. If you want to see the full scope or get involved in the cleanup, please see the details here: Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/62.28.10.10. So far it looks like just Krakoa has been tagged as "will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement". Sariel Xilo (talk) 18:30, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now capitalization

The article NOW Comics has MOS:ALLCAPS problems in its title and throughout the article. (If NOW is an acronym, I've never heard it and there is no such claim in the article.) I have a WP:COI with regard to Now as I did some projects for them, but if someone else wants to tackle it, there you go. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 23:58, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move at Talk:U.S. Agent#Requested move 5 May 2025

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:U.S. Agent#Requested move 5 May 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. cyberdog958^Talk 05:22, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Sailor Moon § Recent LGBT-content changes

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Sailor Moon § Recent LGBT-content changes, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:19, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Christopher Reeve § Juilliard

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Christopher Reeve § Juilliard, which is within the scope of this WikiProject. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:18, 27 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Creators of Big Hero 6?

Even though we have sources stating that the original team was created by Steven T. Seagle and Duncan Rouleau (the story they wrote which would have been the first appearance of the characters was not printed until after the miniseries by writer Scott Lobdell and artist Gus Vasquez), User:Agustinaldo has disregarded this information and without using any sources to back up the claim, changed this in several articles to Lobdell and Vasquez being the creators: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] What is the correct response to this situation? BOZ (talk) 12:58, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Would have been" doesn't work. If the characters debuted in "Sunfire and Big Hero 6" #1, then the creators are the writer and penciller of "Sunfire and Big Hero 6 #1". That's how it's always been regarding comic characters in this wiki.

Examples of this are Ghost Rider (Gary Friedrich and Mike Ploog), Venom (Todd McFarlane and David Michelinie) and Doctor Strange (Stan Lee and Steve Ditko). "Sources" and vague ideas about who came up with the character first aren't factored, we go by the first established writer/penciller duo as noted in the credits for the comics. Agustinaldo (talk) 13:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted edits back to crediting Roleau and Seagle, but I still don't agree with crediting them. We don't credit Jim Shooter and/or Mike Zeck with Venom, even though they "might have" created him, and we give credit to Stan Lee for creating Doctor Strange even though Ditko "might have" been Strange's sole creator. Actual credits in the comics overrule any "might have"s. --Agustinaldo (talk) 13:30, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm wrong, hopefully other respondents can clarify this. Thank you for the self-reverts in the meantime. BOZ (talk) 13:32, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We created John Romita for co-creating Wolverine in the infobox, even though Herb Trimpe drew his first appearances. If the book has a created by credit, then that's a credit to the creators, but we shouldn't assign creators based on assumption. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 13:45, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Back when Romita died, I was vehemently against the "eulogy edits" that named him as the creator of Wolverine, because I do believe Herb Trimpe deserves the credit and not Romita. Just like this time, lack of consensus meant I relented and I let Romita be credited for Wolverine.

When I mean by "the credits", I mean the credits on the comic when the character first debuted, not vague "created by" credits in other comics/other media. The fact is that Sunfire and Big Hero #1 is their debut, not any other "but really written first" comic.

--Agustinaldo (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do third party sources say? Characters aren't always created by the people who wrote/drew their first published appearance. Kirby is the creator of Silver Surfer because Stan Lee publicly said the character wasn't in his story synopsis. Tom DeFalco created Darkhawk but never wrote the series. - Tim — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.85.6.119 (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]