User talk:Lazy-restless

Hello, Sharif uddin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Qatar TV, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Dewritech (talk) 20:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Intra language links however should be added at Wikidata. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 19:54, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ah good, I see you have found how to do these. Wikidata keeps a separate record of your contributions there: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sharif_uddin – Fayenatic London 21:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Death-636, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:33, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canakkale 1915, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hadithbd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources must directly discuss the subject. Thus a story about the earth perhaps having two moons isn't a source for anything to do with the splitting of the moon or discussion among Muslims,which is why I removed it. See WP:NOR. Was 40 billions a typo? That's much more than what is considered to be the Age of the universe. Dougweller (talk) 10:15, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

Dl2000 (talk) 23:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC) Dl2000 (talk) 23:46, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Wikidata manages interwiki links on a separate project on pages such as this. This means that on Wikipedia articles there is now a language bar on the left hand side of your screen where you can edit and add links rather than adding them into the articles themselves.

If you have any questions regarding Wikidata please use the talk page Wikipedia talk:Wikidata.

Dl2000 (talk) 13:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC) Dl2000 (talk) 13:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Trimming (Beard), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jersey92 (talk) 22:52, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:280px-Zero 4 (TV series).png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zero4 (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mona, Lara and MBC 4. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:35, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sharif uddin, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Bengali; did you know there is a Bengali Wikipedia? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 03:40, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sharif uddin, surely you read why I reverted you here; I stated it clearly here. That does not mean that you then restore your edit without explaining why you restored your edit. See WP:BRD and WP:Edit warring. If you are one of those editors who is going to keep reverting without explaining why you are reverting, I will tell you right now that such an approach will not work. Such an approach serves to annoy me. Template:Sexual orientation very clearly states, "Before making any content changes, please discuss them on the talk page first." I suggest you follow that. Flyer22 (talk) 09:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that you've replied. Flyer22 (talk) 10:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks brother,,, Flyer22. :-) Sharif uddin (talk) 11:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I'm female. Flyer22 (talk) 00:34, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! sorry for my mistake :-D and thanks mam.! Sharif uddin (talk) 04:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Abu Bakr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 23:15, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zee Salaam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chris troutman. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Zakir Naik without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 00:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The series first aired on January 1 according to your article, but why not tell us what year that was? Hugo999 (talk) 06:16, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sharif uddin, I just noticed you did an edit here[1]. Could I ask, are you sure this is a free image with no copyright restrictions. It has to be free source with the ability to use, modify and distribute it commercially as well? Please do let me know. If you find it is not, please undo your edit. Happy editing. Mbcap (talk) 03:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC) It is a non-free image and i have added the copyright tag in the image. Look over the image file. Sharif uddin (talk) 03:48, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Al-Sira Al-Nabawiyya (Ibn Kathir).jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ibn Battuta: The Animated Series, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Malay. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CGI, French and Hijrah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Islamic films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingdom of Heaven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you previously voted in a poll at Talk:Bengali people to decide on whose pictures are to appear in a collage at Bengali people. The poll has now closed and a request for ratification of the final list has been sent out. If you wish to do so, please come to Talk:Bengali people thanks Coolabahapple (talk) 19:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bangladesh Awami League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Awami Muslim League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article M. A. Mannan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 22:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Security Printing Corporation (Bangladesh) Ltd., requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Melody Concerto^talk 09:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you believe this CSD nomination is in error, please click the blue button in the article and leave a message on it's talk page. Melody Concerto^talk 09:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will not delete the template and neither should you. You should explain on the article talk page why it shouldn't be deleted. Melody Concerto^talk 09:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You reinstate that material again, and you risk being blocked for disruption.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:54, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow the instructions at the top, where it says "How to open an investigation". Alakzi (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Zina page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please join the discussion at Talk:Zina before reverting again. Thanks. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC) {{unblock|Plz unblock me. I am not any sock puppet, I request to check my account to be sure of it. [[User:Sharif uddin|Sharif uddin]] ([[User talk:Sharif uddin#top|talk]]) 15:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)}}[reply]

This account is not directly blocked. What message appears when you attempt to edit? —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:40, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was showing problem several hours ago. But now it's okay. Sharif uddin (talk) 22:42, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Deepto TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rishtey (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandini. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lazy-restless. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Sharif uddin, I reverted you here and here because, per Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Hatnotes, this is not the way we do hatnotes. Did you read Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Hatnotes? The hatnotes you added are not needed in this case and/or the links are found lower in the article (for example, the lead of the article is already clear that the article is about coitus; the article is also about more than coitus because sexual intercourse has different definitions). You often revert and WP:Edit war without listening. If you see the #Listening to reasons people give for reverting you section above, I addressed that aspect of your editing before. If you don't understand what I am trying to state about something, then ask instead of edit war. For example, you can ask here in this section on your talk page if you don't understand what I mean about hatnote usage. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:22, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon for my misbehave. But in my opinion, at least the link of sex (disambiguation) should be kept above. Above all, the page deserves to have the disambiguation link for its highly importance. Sharif uddin (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Different definitions of sexual intercourse are handled in the article; readers do not need to be pointed to the Sex (disambiguation) page at the Sexual intercourse article. The Sex article was already linked in the Sexual intercourse article, which is another reason why your hatnote is not needed. The term "sexual intercourse" is disambiguated. The Sex (disambiguation) hatnote fits at the top of Sex article, where it currently is, because "sex" is not disambiguated. I don't think you took the time to read Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Hatnotes. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are many links about sexual activity and etcetera in the page but i didn't find any particular link with the page sex in the page. Sharif uddin (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It used to be linked, but it was delinked because that definition of sex is not the one the Sexual intercourse article is about. But this is beside the point. The other stuff I stated above are the main points. Your hatnote states, "This page is about coitus. For the biological study of sex in sexually reproduced organisms, see Sex. For other uses, see Sex (disambiguation)." The first reason that hatnote does not belong is because people are already told that the article is about coitus in the very first sentence of the WP:Lead. The second reason that hatnote does not belong is because the article is not solely about the coitus definition of sexual intercourse. The third reason that hatnote does not belong is because people are not coming to that article for the biological definition of sex (as in what is a male or a female). Also, we do not need two hatnotes. And the Sex (disambiguation) link covers the other definitions of sex anyway; really, that is only link you added to the article that I can see as beneficial. I can compromise with you on the Sex (disambiguation) link, but, in my opinion, it also is not needed for that article. My compromise suggestion is that you use the following hatnote instead:

Ok done. That's gonna be a good consensus. Sharif uddin (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We're set then. But in the future, keep in mind that such pages that are already disambiguated do not need a note at the top telling readers about other uses. The fourth reason the Sex (disambiguation) link doesn't belong in this case ties into the number three reason above. The non-disambiguated Sex page is what needs that hatnote since its title is "Sex" and there are many different definitions of sex. So the "For other uses" aspect fits there; it doesn't quite fit at the Sexual intercourse article because the Sex (disambiguation) link is about other definitions of sex/other topics titled "sex," not other definitions of sexual intercourse/other topics titled "sexual intercourse." The other definitions of sexual intercourse are in the Sexual intercourse article, where they should be, per WP:Broad-concept article. For more on what I mean, see this recent discussion about disambiguation.

On a side note: Did you get my email? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:47, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, but I thought it should be better to communicate through wiki. By the way, many many thanks for the consensus. :D Sharif uddin (talk) 23:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sharif uddin, this is another misuse of hatnotes. Homo (disambiguation) is not about other uses of "homosexuality." It's not needed at the Homosexuality article. It's needed at the Homo article, where it already is. So that addition should be removed from the Homosexuality article. You don't seem to have understood what I stated about how hatnotes are used. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So I take it you read the email? Or is your email address not working? I didn't feel that what I contacted you about via email needed discussion on Wikipedia. It was more so about addressing our editing styles and how I appreciate your work, but that communication with you is difficult. For example, you will make a lot edits to an article, a number of which I or others disagree with, or which go against established WP:Consensus, and you will often keep making the edits when reverted instead of stopping and discussing the matter on the article talk page. It always takes someone else to start the discussion first. And when you strongly believe in an edit, you feel that your edit must stay even when there are valid reasons given for why it should not. You barely use edit summaries. If you start making a lot of edits to the Homosexuality article, for example, I'm sure I and others would disagree with a lot of your changes. In that case, if I were to revert some things, you might let me revert a few things, but not others. And you won't explain unless the matter is brought to your talk page or to the article talk page with a WP:Ping for your username. That is frustrating, especially if a layout has already been thoroughly worked out and you are changing it without discussion. I felt that communication with you via email might be easier. I am fine with most of your changes to the Heterosexuality article thus far, though. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In our country, wikipedia browsing is free of cost in many mobile operator, but not the Gmail or yahoo ha ha ha. Most of our people try to save money because of their middle income. That's one of the causes for which I preferred Wiki for discussing. Sharif uddin (talk) 00:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but you still haven't addressed my concerns above. Others have the same concerns about how you edit. For example, the #Stop edit warring section that Jeppiz posted above. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:31, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, man. Next time I won't do any random adit without others consensus. Oh God, Help me. Sharif uddin (talk) 00:39, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Heterosexuality page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belief (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oprah Winfrey Network. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You added an interwiki link to Jatiya Rakkhi Bahini. Interwiki links no long go into the articles. Interwikilinks are added in Wikidata and the link you added was already in Wikidata. Bgwhite (talk) 07:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Atv and MBC1. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move contentious articles like you did in this case. Like WP:Requested moves makes clear, you should propose a move via that process in the case of moves that are likely to be contested. The term you added is not only not the WP:Common name of the subject, I don't see where it's used in WP:Reliable sources. So I have reverted you on the move and the wording in the lead. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sexual orientation change efforts into Heterosexuality. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:42, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa, thanks for that. I'm not sure how you came across Since Sharif uddin's copying tendency, but since Sharif uddin copies a lot of material from article to article, usually material that he did not write, I was going to note to him sometime today to see WP:Copying within Wikipedia and to follow it (per what is stated at Shootingstar88's talk page). Sharif uddin, if you wrote the material, giving attribution in the edit summary is not needed. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 16:14, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Flyer22 Reborn: The material appeared on the bot report User:EranBot/Copyright/rc. It's best if all copying within Wikipedia has an edit summary providing attribution, so that patrolling admins will know where the material came from, and will not have to hunt through the history of the source article to find out who wrote it. — Diannaa (talk) 18:26, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to familiarize yourself with the Manual of Style, particularly regarding See Also links. Specifically, "The links in the See also section should be relevant, should reflect the links that would be present in a comprehensive article on the topic, and should be limited to a reasonable number." The television show you were linking sounds interesting, but it really is not relevant to those articles. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 01:37, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article was not about the television show (Metrosexuality), but rather than a term (Metrosexual). Sharif uddin (talk) 01:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The links are of questionable relevance even so. Please stop restoring them without discussion. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But it is unquestionable that it is relevant with heterosexuality. Therefore in case of the article heterosexuality only, I will revert it. Sharif uddin (talk) 01:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

The submission appears to be written in Indonesian. This is the English Language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English Language. Please provide a high-quality English Language translation of your submission. Otherwise, you may write it in the Indonesian Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sharif uddin/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Sharif uddin, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 07:58, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kalki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Islamic Voice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How many times do you have to be warned for WP:Edit warring before you get the point? It's gotten to where I am tempted to report your persistent edit warring behavior at WP:ANI. I already explained to you that this is redundant. It is not needed in the least. Now you can revert yourself on it, or it will be removed via consensus when I bring other editors into the matter. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:06, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer bringing other editors into the matter to get a consensus. You can proceed on. An article can have both underlying template end opening sidebar template on the subject matter. There is no offense or violation of policy in it. Sharif uddin (talk) 17:55, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I took the matter to the talk page and to WP:Med. As for "offense or violation," the offense or violation is your propensity toward edit warring. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 08:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And once again, more edit warring after a guideline was clearly explained to you. You did the same yesterday at the Homosexuality article, and stopped only after you were reverted by Jytdog. You were also edit warring with Jytdog elsewhere. I don't know why you think the rules do not apply to you, but if you keep editing like this, I will indeed make a case on you at WP:ANI. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Because of this, other edit warring issues noted in your talk page's edit history, and what I stated in the #Communicating section above, I will report you when I get the time to write up a case on you. That should be in two or three days since I'm very busy lately. In the meantime, you should think on what you want to state in the WP:ANI case. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's taking longer than expected for me to start the case, but that's because I'm waiting for a current WP:ANI case I'm involved in to clear out first. After that, I will start a case on your edit warring since I feel this really needs to be addressed by the community. You simply revert, usually without giving any valid explanation and expect not to be reverted in turn. If you are reverted in turn, with a valid explanation as to why, you simply revert again and think the case is supposed to be settled there. Editors are left not wanting to repeatedly revert you because of fear of edit warring themselves and/or being blocked for it. You go about your way, and your edit remains unless there is more than one editor there to revert you. And this needs to stop. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:09, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homosexuality and religion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brotherly love. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Islamic sexual jurisprudence into Zina. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. This is your second warning for this problem. Please start providing the required attribution, or you could be facing a block for copyright violations. — Diannaa (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Islamic sexual jurisprudence, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asexual. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:50, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shirk. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sharif uddin, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Gümüş (TV series) has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:14, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sex may have broken the syntax by modifying 6 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{double image|right|Anisogamy.svg|114|Isogamy.svg|120|Different forms of [[anisogamy]]:<br>A) anisogamy of motile cells, B) oogamy (egg cell and sperm cell), C) anisogamy of non-motile cells (egg cell and spermatia).|Different forms of isogamy:<br>A) isogamy of [[motile cell]]s, B) isogamy of non-motile cells, C) conjugation.}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your templates do not belong on every sex article possible. And adding both to an article is highly redundant and therefore overkill. One of them is enough. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:05, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article is an example of where your template does not fit (despite the way you've crafted the template to try and make it fit). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:Requested moves, just like moving articles should be discussed first before the move happens, if the move is likely to be contested, so should moving templates. Moving templates you recently created is one thing, but moving long-standing templates is another. I don't know what you thought you were doing with Template:Human sexuality and Template:Human sexuality and sexology, but besides having created more redundancy, you ended up doing a cut and paste move; such moves are a no; this is because cut and paste moves lose the edit history of the page. The edit history of Template:Human sexuality only shows you now, while the talk page shows a longer history. So now I will list those two moves at WP:Requested moves and request a WP:Histmerge. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:25, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Taken to Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stop this and the other WP:Disruptive editing you engage in, or I will finally be taking you to WP:ANI. I am beyond tired of your edits messing up a number of our articles. We go by WP:Consensus here, not you forcing whatever change you want on our articles. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:49, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flyer22 Reborn, I think that merging the history is a better decision for that because every article and template of wikipedia should be a clear title which will represent the central subject of the matter. What is your opinion? Sharif uddin (talk) 02:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And you hardly ever discuss; you just do what you want and WP:Edit war over it, and I'm tired of that. I'm having those pages moved back. If you really want to discuss, you will bring the matter up on one of the talk pages and centralize the discussion (per WP:TALKCENT) after they are moved back. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 02:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Flyer22 Reborn, check in the talk page of the sex template, I gave a message about that but no one paid heed. Sharif uddin (talk) 03:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a suggestion, not a discussion. No answer does not mean that you should then go ahead move the template. If you want something like that moved, you are supposed to make sure that you bring a number of editors in to discuss the matter; that is what WP:Requested moves is for. I also reverted this disruptive blanking. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you attempting to discuss things like you did here. Thank you. As noted in the #Communicating section above, that is the main thing I'm looking for from you when you edit. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 03:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See here and here. That's the WP:Consensus. You should not then try to circumvent the consensus, as you did here and here. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And in case you want to point out that there was no consensus, "no consensus" is also a part of the WP:Consensus policy; see WP:NOCONSENSUS. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 20:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Omar (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hijrah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lazy-restless (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Why I have been blocked?

Decline reason:

Technical decline - you have been editing since this request, so you are clearly not blocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. This account is not directly blocked. Can you please tell us what it says when you try to edit? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:35, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Zakir Naik page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
It appears that you've been warned about your behavior multiple times in the past and are continuing this now around this article and those related to Peace TV —SpacemanSpiff 16:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sharif – regarding your requesto to merge the templates, this appears to have already been done, because Template:Human sexuality already redirects to Template:Sex. In any case the Merger Requests page is for articles only – requests to merge templates or categories are done via a different process. Richard3120 (talk) 02:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Richard3120, also see what I stated above. This merger appears to be Sharif uddin's latest attempt to sidestep a previous discussion. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:56, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sharif uddin, you were already warned above. If this and this happens again, I will be starting that long overdue case on you at WP:ANI, or perhaps, since your edit warring needs a case to itself, I'll just focus on this template case. I reiterate "You should not then try to circumvent the consensus." WP:Consensus is policy. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sharif uddin, Your edits (or tweaks!) on the Zakir Naik page is of little help to the article. Kindly avoid unnecessary changes. Sentences are often framed in coherence with the source but with a sense of neutrality. It appears as if you want to dampen the content with insignificant changes in choice of words. As you may be knowing that the burden of evidence rests with the editor who adds or restores material. In case of WP:BLP, Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources. I hope you get the point. Feel free to discuss on this matter. – Anand2202 (talk) 11:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]